左侧鼻气管插管中的反向插管方向与鼻衄:随机对照试验。

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Jun-Young Park, Jihion Yu, Chan-Sik Kim, Taeho Mun, Woo Shik Jeong, Jong Woo Choi, Kichang Lee, Young-Kug Kim
{"title":"左侧鼻气管插管中的反向插管方向与鼻衄:随机对照试验。","authors":"Jun-Young Park, Jihion Yu, Chan-Sik Kim, Taeho Mun, Woo Shik Jeong, Jong Woo Choi, Kichang Lee, Young-Kug Kim","doi":"10.4097/kja.24337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation via the left nostril is more frequent than that during intubation via the right nostril. This study evaluated the effect of the reverse bevel and tip direction of the nasotracheal tube on the incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation via the left nostril.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing right-sided maxillofacial surgery requiring left nasotracheal intubation were randomly allocated to the control (tracheal tube in the conventional direction) or reverse (a 180˚ reverse direction, with the tube bevel facing the nasal septum and the leading edge (i.e., the tip) of the bevel pointing away from the nasal septum) groups (n = 37 for both). The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis evaluated using videolaryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of epistaxis in the reverse group was significantly lower than that in the control group (9 [24.3%] vs. 20 [54.1%], P = 0.009; relative risk = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.85; absolute risk reduction = 29.8%; number needed to treat = 3.36). The severity of epistaxis was significantly lower in the reverse group (P = 0.002). The first attempt nasal passage (P = 0.027) was significantly higher in the reverse group. Postoperative nasal pain was lower (P < 0.001), and patient satisfaction was higher (P < 0.001) in the reverse group. Nasotracheal tube-related complications did not occur in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reverse bevel and tip direction of the nasotracheal tube reduced the incidence and severity of epistaxis and increased patient satisfaction among patients undergoing left nasotracheal intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17855,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reverse tube direction and epistaxis in left nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Young Park, Jihion Yu, Chan-Sik Kim, Taeho Mun, Woo Shik Jeong, Jong Woo Choi, Kichang Lee, Young-Kug Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4097/kja.24337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation via the left nostril is more frequent than that during intubation via the right nostril. This study evaluated the effect of the reverse bevel and tip direction of the nasotracheal tube on the incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation via the left nostril.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing right-sided maxillofacial surgery requiring left nasotracheal intubation were randomly allocated to the control (tracheal tube in the conventional direction) or reverse (a 180˚ reverse direction, with the tube bevel facing the nasal septum and the leading edge (i.e., the tip) of the bevel pointing away from the nasal septum) groups (n = 37 for both). The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis evaluated using videolaryngoscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of epistaxis in the reverse group was significantly lower than that in the control group (9 [24.3%] vs. 20 [54.1%], P = 0.009; relative risk = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.85; absolute risk reduction = 29.8%; number needed to treat = 3.36). The severity of epistaxis was significantly lower in the reverse group (P = 0.002). The first attempt nasal passage (P = 0.027) was significantly higher in the reverse group. Postoperative nasal pain was lower (P < 0.001), and patient satisfaction was higher (P < 0.001) in the reverse group. Nasotracheal tube-related complications did not occur in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reverse bevel and tip direction of the nasotracheal tube reduced the incidence and severity of epistaxis and increased patient satisfaction among patients undergoing left nasotracheal intubation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.24337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经左鼻孔进行鼻气管插管时鼻衄的发生率高于经右鼻孔插管。本研究评估了鼻气管导管的反向斜面和尖端方向对经左鼻孔进行鼻气管插管时鼻衄发生率的影响:接受右侧颌面外科手术、需要左侧鼻气管插管的患者被随机分配到对照组(气管导管按常规方向)或反向组(180˚反向,导管斜面朝向鼻中隔,斜面前缘(即尖端)远离鼻中隔)(两组均为37人)。主要结果是使用视频喉镜评估鼻衄的发生率:结果:反向组鼻衄发生率明显低于对照组(9 [24.3%] vs. 20 [54.1%],P = 0.009;相对风险 = 0.45;95% CI:0.24, 0.85;绝对风险降低 = 29.8%;治疗所需人数 = 3.36)。反向组鼻衄的严重程度明显降低(P = 0.002)。反向组首次尝试鼻腔通过率(P = 0.027)明显更高。反向组术后鼻腔疼痛较低(P < 0.001),患者满意度较高(P < 0.001)。两组患者均未出现气管导管相关并发症:结论:鼻气管插管的反向斜面和尖端方向降低了鼻衄的发生率和严重程度,提高了左鼻气管插管患者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reverse tube direction and epistaxis in left nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: The incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation via the left nostril is more frequent than that during intubation via the right nostril. This study evaluated the effect of the reverse bevel and tip direction of the nasotracheal tube on the incidence of epistaxis during nasotracheal intubation via the left nostril.

Methods: Patients undergoing right-sided maxillofacial surgery requiring left nasotracheal intubation were randomly allocated to the control (tracheal tube in the conventional direction) or reverse (a 180˚ reverse direction, with the tube bevel facing the nasal septum and the leading edge (i.e., the tip) of the bevel pointing away from the nasal septum) groups (n = 37 for both). The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis evaluated using videolaryngoscopy.

Results: The incidence of epistaxis in the reverse group was significantly lower than that in the control group (9 [24.3%] vs. 20 [54.1%], P = 0.009; relative risk = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.24, 0.85; absolute risk reduction = 29.8%; number needed to treat = 3.36). The severity of epistaxis was significantly lower in the reverse group (P = 0.002). The first attempt nasal passage (P = 0.027) was significantly higher in the reverse group. Postoperative nasal pain was lower (P < 0.001), and patient satisfaction was higher (P < 0.001) in the reverse group. Nasotracheal tube-related complications did not occur in either group.

Conclusions: The reverse bevel and tip direction of the nasotracheal tube reduced the incidence and severity of epistaxis and increased patient satisfaction among patients undergoing left nasotracheal intubation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
84
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信