Francesco Tovoli, Dante Pio Pallotta, Caterina Vivaldi, Claudia Campani, Piera Federico, Andrea Palloni, Andrea Dalbeni, Caterina Soldà, Lorenzo Lani, Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni, Ingrid Garajova, Luca Ielasi, Stefania De Lorenzo, Alessandro Granito, Bernardo Stefanini, Gianluca Masi, Fabio Marra, Sara Lonardi, Giovanni Brandi, Bruno Daniele, Alessandra Auriemma, Laura Schiadà, Rusi Chen, Fabio Piscaglia
{"title":"索拉非尼作为阿特珠单抗-贝伐单抗治疗不可切除性肝细胞癌后的二线治疗方案的次优疗效。","authors":"Francesco Tovoli, Dante Pio Pallotta, Caterina Vivaldi, Claudia Campani, Piera Federico, Andrea Palloni, Andrea Dalbeni, Caterina Soldà, Lorenzo Lani, Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni, Ingrid Garajova, Luca Ielasi, Stefania De Lorenzo, Alessandro Granito, Bernardo Stefanini, Gianluca Masi, Fabio Marra, Sara Lonardi, Giovanni Brandi, Bruno Daniele, Alessandra Auriemma, Laura Schiadà, Rusi Chen, Fabio Piscaglia","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.07.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB) for hepatocellular carcinoma will eventually experience disease progression. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are undergoing to identify second-line treatments. Where RCTs are unavailable or patients are non-eligible, sorafenib is often prescribed based on approval and reimbursement policies. However, evidence supporting this approach is minimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients who permanently discontinued AB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ARTE database prospectively collects patients treated with AB in a real-life setting. We analysed the outcome of patients who received sorafenib as second-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst 213 patients, 130 (61.0 %) permanently discontinued AB. Of them, 54 received second- line treatments, and sorafenib was prescribed in 40 patients. The disease control rate (DCR) was 10.0 %. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 3.3 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7-3.9) and 6.9 months (95 % CI 2.7-11.1), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients progressing under AB, the efficacy of sorafenib on different outcomes is limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suboptimal outcomes of sorafenib as a second-line treatment after atezolizumab-bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Tovoli, Dante Pio Pallotta, Caterina Vivaldi, Claudia Campani, Piera Federico, Andrea Palloni, Andrea Dalbeni, Caterina Soldà, Lorenzo Lani, Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni, Ingrid Garajova, Luca Ielasi, Stefania De Lorenzo, Alessandro Granito, Bernardo Stefanini, Gianluca Masi, Fabio Marra, Sara Lonardi, Giovanni Brandi, Bruno Daniele, Alessandra Auriemma, Laura Schiadà, Rusi Chen, Fabio Piscaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dld.2024.07.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB) for hepatocellular carcinoma will eventually experience disease progression. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are undergoing to identify second-line treatments. Where RCTs are unavailable or patients are non-eligible, sorafenib is often prescribed based on approval and reimbursement policies. However, evidence supporting this approach is minimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients who permanently discontinued AB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ARTE database prospectively collects patients treated with AB in a real-life setting. We analysed the outcome of patients who received sorafenib as second-line treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amongst 213 patients, 130 (61.0 %) permanently discontinued AB. Of them, 54 received second- line treatments, and sorafenib was prescribed in 40 patients. The disease control rate (DCR) was 10.0 %. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 3.3 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7-3.9) and 6.9 months (95 % CI 2.7-11.1), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients progressing under AB, the efficacy of sorafenib on different outcomes is limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive and Liver Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive and Liver Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.07.035\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.07.035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:大多数接受阿特珠单抗-贝伐单抗(AB)治疗肝细胞癌的患者最终会出现疾病进展。目前正在进行随机临床试验 (RCT),以确定二线治疗方案。在没有随机临床试验或患者不符合条件的情况下,通常会根据批准和报销政策处方索拉非尼。然而,支持这种方法的证据却很少:评估索拉非尼对永久停用 AB 的患者的疗效和安全性:ARTE数据库前瞻性地收集了现实生活中接受AB治疗的患者。我们分析了接受索拉非尼二线治疗的患者的疗效:在213名患者中,有130人(61.0%)永久中断了AB治疗。其中 54 人接受了二线治疗,40 人接受了索拉非尼治疗。疾病控制率(DCR)为10.0%。中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期分别为3.3个月(95%置信区间[CI] 2.7-3.9)和6.9个月(95%置信区间[CI] 2.7-11.1):索拉非尼对AB进展期患者的疗效有限。
Suboptimal outcomes of sorafenib as a second-line treatment after atezolizumab-bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Background: Most patients receiving atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB) for hepatocellular carcinoma will eventually experience disease progression. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are undergoing to identify second-line treatments. Where RCTs are unavailable or patients are non-eligible, sorafenib is often prescribed based on approval and reimbursement policies. However, evidence supporting this approach is minimal.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients who permanently discontinued AB.
Methods: The ARTE database prospectively collects patients treated with AB in a real-life setting. We analysed the outcome of patients who received sorafenib as second-line treatment.
Results: Amongst 213 patients, 130 (61.0 %) permanently discontinued AB. Of them, 54 received second- line treatments, and sorafenib was prescribed in 40 patients. The disease control rate (DCR) was 10.0 %. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival were 3.3 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.7-3.9) and 6.9 months (95 % CI 2.7-11.1), respectively.
Conclusions: In patients progressing under AB, the efficacy of sorafenib on different outcomes is limited.
期刊介绍:
Digestive and Liver Disease is an international journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. It is the official journal of Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF); Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP); Italian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SIED); Italian Association for Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO); Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE); Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGENP) and Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD).
Digestive and Liver Disease publishes papers on basic and clinical research in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Contributions consist of:
Original Papers
Correspondence to the Editor
Editorials, Reviews and Special Articles
Progress Reports
Image of the Month
Congress Proceedings
Symposia and Mini-symposia.