{"title":"监测害虫是否有回报?对控制铃木果蝇的生物经济评估\"。","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/ps.8374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Yeh DA, Dai B, Gómez MI and Walton VM, Does monitoring pests pay off? A bioeconomic assessment of <i>Drosophila suzukii</i> controls. <i>Pest Manag Sci</i> <b>80</b>:708–723 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7801</p><p>(1) In column 7 of Table 5 in the ‘3 RESULTS’ section, the values of ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct values are highlighted below.\n </p><p>(2) In Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 of the ‘3 RESULTS’ section, the strategy ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct figures with the changes are shown below.\n </p><p>(4) In paragraph 2 of the ‘3.2 Economic outcomes of control strategies’ section, the text ‘Compared to a fixed harvest schedule of nine times per season (e.g., strategy S3), S4 has 26 harvests on average.’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Compared to a fixed harvest schedule of nine times per season (e.g., strategy S3), S4 has 20 harvests on average.’</p><p>(5) In paragraph 2 of the ‘3.2 Economic outcomes of control strategies’ section, the text ‘Nonetheless, S4 results in a lower rejection rate because of more frequent harvesting (decrease from 2% in S3 to 1.8% in S4).’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Nonetheless, S4 results in a lower rejection rate because of more frequent harvesting (decrease from 2% in S3 to 1% in S4).’</p><p>(6) In paragraph 1 of the ‘4 Discussion and Conclusion’ section. The text ‘The simulation results show that profit ranges from $75 483 to $115 776 per farm.’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘The simulation results show that profit ranges from $75 483 to $112 302 per farm.’</p><p>(7) In column 7 of Tables A1–A6 in the ‘5 Appendix’ section, the values of ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct values are highlighted below.\n </p><p>We apologize for the error.</p>","PeriodicalId":218,"journal":{"name":"Pest Management Science","volume":"80 12","pages":"6634-6637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ps.8374","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to ‘Does monitoring pests pay off? A bioeconomic assessment of Drosophila suzukii controls’\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ps.8374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Yeh DA, Dai B, Gómez MI and Walton VM, Does monitoring pests pay off? A bioeconomic assessment of <i>Drosophila suzukii</i> controls. <i>Pest Manag Sci</i> <b>80</b>:708–723 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7801</p><p>(1) In column 7 of Table 5 in the ‘3 RESULTS’ section, the values of ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct values are highlighted below.\\n </p><p>(2) In Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 of the ‘3 RESULTS’ section, the strategy ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct figures with the changes are shown below.\\n </p><p>(4) In paragraph 2 of the ‘3.2 Economic outcomes of control strategies’ section, the text ‘Compared to a fixed harvest schedule of nine times per season (e.g., strategy S3), S4 has 26 harvests on average.’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Compared to a fixed harvest schedule of nine times per season (e.g., strategy S3), S4 has 20 harvests on average.’</p><p>(5) In paragraph 2 of the ‘3.2 Economic outcomes of control strategies’ section, the text ‘Nonetheless, S4 results in a lower rejection rate because of more frequent harvesting (decrease from 2% in S3 to 1.8% in S4).’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Nonetheless, S4 results in a lower rejection rate because of more frequent harvesting (decrease from 2% in S3 to 1% in S4).’</p><p>(6) In paragraph 1 of the ‘4 Discussion and Conclusion’ section. The text ‘The simulation results show that profit ranges from $75 483 to $115 776 per farm.’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘The simulation results show that profit ranges from $75 483 to $112 302 per farm.’</p><p>(7) In column 7 of Tables A1–A6 in the ‘5 Appendix’ section, the values of ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct values are highlighted below.\\n </p><p>We apologize for the error.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pest Management Science\",\"volume\":\"80 12\",\"pages\":\"6634-6637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ps.8374\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pest Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.8374\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pest Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.8374","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correction to ‘Does monitoring pests pay off? A bioeconomic assessment of Drosophila suzukii controls’
Yeh DA, Dai B, Gómez MI and Walton VM, Does monitoring pests pay off? A bioeconomic assessment of Drosophila suzukii controls. Pest Manag Sci80:708–723 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.7801
(1) In column 7 of Table 5 in the ‘3 RESULTS’ section, the values of ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct values are highlighted below.
(2) In Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 of the ‘3 RESULTS’ section, the strategy ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct figures with the changes are shown below.
(4) In paragraph 2 of the ‘3.2 Economic outcomes of control strategies’ section, the text ‘Compared to a fixed harvest schedule of nine times per season (e.g., strategy S3), S4 has 26 harvests on average.’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Compared to a fixed harvest schedule of nine times per season (e.g., strategy S3), S4 has 20 harvests on average.’
(5) In paragraph 2 of the ‘3.2 Economic outcomes of control strategies’ section, the text ‘Nonetheless, S4 results in a lower rejection rate because of more frequent harvesting (decrease from 2% in S3 to 1.8% in S4).’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘Nonetheless, S4 results in a lower rejection rate because of more frequent harvesting (decrease from 2% in S3 to 1% in S4).’
(6) In paragraph 1 of the ‘4 Discussion and Conclusion’ section. The text ‘The simulation results show that profit ranges from $75 483 to $115 776 per farm.’ was incorrect. This should have read: ‘The simulation results show that profit ranges from $75 483 to $112 302 per farm.’
(7) In column 7 of Tables A1–A6 in the ‘5 Appendix’ section, the values of ‘S4: Fruit sampling to guide spraying and harvesting’ were incorrect. The correct values are highlighted below.
期刊介绍:
Pest Management Science is the international journal of research and development in crop protection and pest control. Since its launch in 1970, the journal has become the premier forum for papers on the discovery, application, and impact on the environment of products and strategies designed for pest management.
Published for SCI by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.