K. Cann, R. Leichenko, J. Herb, M. Kaplan, N. Howell
{"title":"建立公平的研究伙伴关系:从社区气候复原力赠款计划中学习","authors":"K. Cann, R. Leichenko, J. Herb, M. Kaplan, N. Howell","doi":"10.1029/2023CSJ000045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Calls for the co-production of climate knowledge and services are increasingly prominent in research and funding proposals, including within federally funded programs. While co-production has led to more accessible and relevant climate services for frontline communities, scholars have identified numerous barriers to equitable relationships and outcomes within co-production partnerships. In an effort to support the development of climate services through equitable research partnerships, the Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast, a NOAA Climate Adaptation Partnership team, collaboratively designed and launched the Community Climate Resilience (CCR) Grant competition in 2022. The CCR program serves to provide funding and build capacity among community-based organizations (CBOs) responding to climate variability in historically disinvested communities in the urban Northeast, as well as foster co-production partnerships between the organizations and local university-based researchers. This paper assesses the design and implementation of the program based on data collected through a survey of research partners, discussions with key stakeholders, and observation of relevant project meetings. Despite the incorporation of lessons from similar co-production projects, program designers found several persistent impediments to equitable partnerships, including time constraints, funding limitations, and burdensome institutional requirements. We reflect on these challenges and offer strategies for overcoming barriers to equitable partnerships, including streamlining funding pass-through structures, increasing transparency in funding competitions, promoting flexible funding options, and fostering communities of practice among CBOs and university partners. The findings are relevant for researchers and practitioners implementing equity-focused co-production partnerships and small grant programs in climate services and related fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":93639,"journal":{"name":"Community science","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000045","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building Equitable Research Partnerships: Learning From a Community Climate Resilience Grant Program\",\"authors\":\"K. Cann, R. Leichenko, J. Herb, M. Kaplan, N. Howell\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023CSJ000045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Calls for the co-production of climate knowledge and services are increasingly prominent in research and funding proposals, including within federally funded programs. While co-production has led to more accessible and relevant climate services for frontline communities, scholars have identified numerous barriers to equitable relationships and outcomes within co-production partnerships. In an effort to support the development of climate services through equitable research partnerships, the Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast, a NOAA Climate Adaptation Partnership team, collaboratively designed and launched the Community Climate Resilience (CCR) Grant competition in 2022. The CCR program serves to provide funding and build capacity among community-based organizations (CBOs) responding to climate variability in historically disinvested communities in the urban Northeast, as well as foster co-production partnerships between the organizations and local university-based researchers. This paper assesses the design and implementation of the program based on data collected through a survey of research partners, discussions with key stakeholders, and observation of relevant project meetings. Despite the incorporation of lessons from similar co-production projects, program designers found several persistent impediments to equitable partnerships, including time constraints, funding limitations, and burdensome institutional requirements. We reflect on these challenges and offer strategies for overcoming barriers to equitable partnerships, including streamlining funding pass-through structures, increasing transparency in funding competitions, promoting flexible funding options, and fostering communities of practice among CBOs and university partners. The findings are relevant for researchers and practitioners implementing equity-focused co-production partnerships and small grant programs in climate services and related fields.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community science\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023CSJ000045\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023CSJ000045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023CSJ000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在包括联邦资助项目在内的研究和资助提案中,有关共同生产气候知识和服务的呼吁日益突出。虽然共同生产为一线社区带来了更多可获得的相关气候服务,但学者们也发现了在共同生产伙伴关系中公平关系和成果的诸多障碍。为了通过公平的研究伙伴关系支持气候服务的发展,美国国家海洋和大气管理局气候适应伙伴关系团队 "东北部城市气候风险联合会"(Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast)于 2022 年合作设计并启动了 "社区气候复原力(CCR)赠款 "竞赛。CCR 计划旨在为东北部城市中历来缺乏投资的社区组织(CBOs)提供资金并建设其应对气候变异的能力,同时促进这些组织与当地大学研究人员之间的合作。本文通过对研究合作伙伴的调查、与主要利益相关者的讨论以及对相关项目会议的观察,对项目的设计和实施进行了评估。尽管从类似的共同生产项目中吸取了经验教训,但项目设计者还是发现了一些长期存在的阻碍公平合作的因素,包括时间限制、资金限制和繁琐的机构要求。我们对这些挑战进行了反思,并提出了克服公平合作障碍的策略,包括简化资金转手结构、提高资金竞争的透明度、促进灵活的资金选择,以及在社区组织和大学合作伙伴之间培养实践社区。这些发现对在气候服务及相关领域实施以公平为重点的共同生产伙伴关系和小额赠款计划的研究人员和从业人员具有现实意义。
Building Equitable Research Partnerships: Learning From a Community Climate Resilience Grant Program
Calls for the co-production of climate knowledge and services are increasingly prominent in research and funding proposals, including within federally funded programs. While co-production has led to more accessible and relevant climate services for frontline communities, scholars have identified numerous barriers to equitable relationships and outcomes within co-production partnerships. In an effort to support the development of climate services through equitable research partnerships, the Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast, a NOAA Climate Adaptation Partnership team, collaboratively designed and launched the Community Climate Resilience (CCR) Grant competition in 2022. The CCR program serves to provide funding and build capacity among community-based organizations (CBOs) responding to climate variability in historically disinvested communities in the urban Northeast, as well as foster co-production partnerships between the organizations and local university-based researchers. This paper assesses the design and implementation of the program based on data collected through a survey of research partners, discussions with key stakeholders, and observation of relevant project meetings. Despite the incorporation of lessons from similar co-production projects, program designers found several persistent impediments to equitable partnerships, including time constraints, funding limitations, and burdensome institutional requirements. We reflect on these challenges and offer strategies for overcoming barriers to equitable partnerships, including streamlining funding pass-through structures, increasing transparency in funding competitions, promoting flexible funding options, and fostering communities of practice among CBOs and university partners. The findings are relevant for researchers and practitioners implementing equity-focused co-production partnerships and small grant programs in climate services and related fields.