在初级系统假说的完整计算模型中同时模拟纯粹性、表面性和语音性获得性阅读障碍

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ya-Ning Chang , Stephen Welbourne , Steve Furber , Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
{"title":"在初级系统假说的完整计算模型中同时模拟纯粹性、表面性和语音性获得性阅读障碍","authors":"Ya-Ning Chang ,&nbsp;Stephen Welbourne ,&nbsp;Steve Furber ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to the primary systems hypothesis, reading requires interactions of visual-orthographic, phonological and semantic systems. Damage to each primary system generates very different types of acquired dyslexia. Variants of the connectionist ‘triangle’ models of reading have been developed to investigate individual acquired dyslexia. However, only a few studies have investigated multiple acquired alexia within one framework. Importantly, there are no studies that simultaneously simulate both central dyslexia (e.g. surface and phonological dyslexia) and peripheral dyslexia (e.g. pure alexia). That is largely due to the lack of a visual component in the traditional reading models. To verify the predictions made by the primary systems hypothesis, we developed a connectionist ‘deep’ multi-layer triangle model of reading including visual, orthographic, phonological and semantic processing layers. We investigated whether damage to the model could produce the general behavioural patterns of impaired performance observed in patients with the corresponding reading deficits. Crucially, damage to the visual-orthographic, phonological or semantic components of the model resulted in the expected reading impairments associated with pure alexia, phonological dyslexia and surface dyslexia, respectively. The simulation results demonstrated for the first time that neurologically-impaired reading including both central and peripheral dyslexia could be addressed within a single triangle model of reading. The findings are consistent with the predictions made by the primary systems hypothesis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"179 ","pages":"Pages 112-125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002089/pdfft?md5=1273ca9819d1a9013ce8d14d98a2f67b&pid=1-s2.0-S0010945224002089-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous simulations of pure, surface and phonological acquired dyslexia within a full computational model of the primary systems hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Ning Chang ,&nbsp;Stephen Welbourne ,&nbsp;Steve Furber ,&nbsp;Matthew A. Lambon Ralph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cortex.2024.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>According to the primary systems hypothesis, reading requires interactions of visual-orthographic, phonological and semantic systems. Damage to each primary system generates very different types of acquired dyslexia. Variants of the connectionist ‘triangle’ models of reading have been developed to investigate individual acquired dyslexia. However, only a few studies have investigated multiple acquired alexia within one framework. Importantly, there are no studies that simultaneously simulate both central dyslexia (e.g. surface and phonological dyslexia) and peripheral dyslexia (e.g. pure alexia). That is largely due to the lack of a visual component in the traditional reading models. To verify the predictions made by the primary systems hypothesis, we developed a connectionist ‘deep’ multi-layer triangle model of reading including visual, orthographic, phonological and semantic processing layers. We investigated whether damage to the model could produce the general behavioural patterns of impaired performance observed in patients with the corresponding reading deficits. Crucially, damage to the visual-orthographic, phonological or semantic components of the model resulted in the expected reading impairments associated with pure alexia, phonological dyslexia and surface dyslexia, respectively. The simulation results demonstrated for the first time that neurologically-impaired reading including both central and peripheral dyslexia could be addressed within a single triangle model of reading. The findings are consistent with the predictions made by the primary systems hypothesis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cortex\",\"volume\":\"179 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 112-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002089/pdfft?md5=1273ca9819d1a9013ce8d14d98a2f67b&pid=1-s2.0-S0010945224002089-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cortex\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945224002089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据初级系统假说,阅读需要视觉-正字法、语音和语义系统的相互作用。每个主要系统的损伤都会导致不同类型的后天性阅读障碍。为了研究个体获得性阅读障碍,人们开发了各种不同的联结主义 "三角形 "阅读模型。然而,只有少数研究在一个框架内调查了多种获得性阅读障碍。重要的是,目前还没有同时模拟中枢性阅读障碍(如表面阅读障碍和语音阅读障碍)和边缘性阅读障碍(如纯粹阅读障碍)的研究。这在很大程度上是由于传统阅读模型中缺少视觉部分。为了验证初级系统假说的预测,我们开发了一个连接主义 "深度 "多层三角阅读模型,包括视觉、正字法、语音和语义处理层。我们研究了对该模型的破坏是否会产生在相应阅读障碍患者身上观察到的表现受损的一般行为模式。最重要的是,对模型的视觉正字法、语音或语义部分的破坏分别导致了与纯粹诵读困难、语音诵读困难和表面诵读困难相关的预期阅读障碍。模拟结果首次证明,神经性阅读障碍(包括中枢性和外周性阅读障碍)可以在单一的三角形阅读模型中得到解决。研究结果与主要系统假说的预测一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simultaneous simulations of pure, surface and phonological acquired dyslexia within a full computational model of the primary systems hypothesis

According to the primary systems hypothesis, reading requires interactions of visual-orthographic, phonological and semantic systems. Damage to each primary system generates very different types of acquired dyslexia. Variants of the connectionist ‘triangle’ models of reading have been developed to investigate individual acquired dyslexia. However, only a few studies have investigated multiple acquired alexia within one framework. Importantly, there are no studies that simultaneously simulate both central dyslexia (e.g. surface and phonological dyslexia) and peripheral dyslexia (e.g. pure alexia). That is largely due to the lack of a visual component in the traditional reading models. To verify the predictions made by the primary systems hypothesis, we developed a connectionist ‘deep’ multi-layer triangle model of reading including visual, orthographic, phonological and semantic processing layers. We investigated whether damage to the model could produce the general behavioural patterns of impaired performance observed in patients with the corresponding reading deficits. Crucially, damage to the visual-orthographic, phonological or semantic components of the model resulted in the expected reading impairments associated with pure alexia, phonological dyslexia and surface dyslexia, respectively. The simulation results demonstrated for the first time that neurologically-impaired reading including both central and peripheral dyslexia could be addressed within a single triangle model of reading. The findings are consistent with the predictions made by the primary systems hypothesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信