Comparison of measles plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and measles virus-specific IgG ELISA for assessment of immunogenicity of measles-mumps-rubella vaccination at 5–7 months of age and maternal measles antibodies

Background

Assessing the risk of measles outbreaks and identifying the susceptible parts of the population is essential to timely intervention. Infants between 6–12 months are increasingly susceptible to measles but evaluating the performance of high throughput enzyme immunoassays (ELISAs) in infants < 9 months of age is lacking.

Methods

A commercially available ELISA kit (Creative Diagnostics, DEIA359) for estimating measles seroprotection was evaluated in infants 5–7 months of age. In an immunogenicity substudy in the Danish MMR trial conducted between 2019–2021, infants (and mothers at baseline) were sampled before and one month after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR) or placebo as well as one month after routine MMR at 15 months. Measles IgG ELISA was compared to the gold standard but labor-intensive measles plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) by Pearson and Spearman correlations and by estimating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV).

Findings

Measles IgG levels compared to PRNT antibodies had a Pearson’s correlation coefficient between 0.10–0.24. Seroprotection rates measured by ELISA in young infants were 10–14% lower than measured by PRNT. The sensitivity of the ELISA to detect serological protection compared to PRNT in the infant population differed markedly across sampling time points and was 14%, 40%, and 92% at baseline, post-intervention, and post-routine MMR, whereas the specificity was 99%, 93%, and 43%, respectively. The PPV and NPV were 68% and 87% in infants at baseline.

Interpretation

The correlation between measles IgG and PRNT antibodies was low. Seroprotection was underestimated using ELISA. High-accuracy tests are needed to avoid misclassifications and practices that lead to primary or secondary vaccine failure or retention of vaccination in outbreak settings. Baseline PPV and NPV suggested some applicability of ELISA in predicting serological protection in this age group. However, PRNT may be the only accurate estimator of serological protection in young infants.