COVID-19 大流行期间的孤独感:来自五个欧洲国家的证据

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Alessio Rebechi , Anthony Lepinteur , Andrew E. Clark , Nicholas Rohde , Claus Vögele , Conchita D’Ambrosio
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间的孤独感:来自五个欧洲国家的证据","authors":"Alessio Rebechi ,&nbsp;Anthony Lepinteur ,&nbsp;Andrew E. Clark ,&nbsp;Nicholas Rohde ,&nbsp;Claus Vögele ,&nbsp;Conchita D’Ambrosio","doi":"10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We use quarterly panel data from the COME-HERE survey covering five European countries to analyse three facets of the experience of loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, in terms of prevalence, loneliness peaked in April 2020, followed by a U-shape pattern in the rest of 2020, and then remained relatively stable throughout 2021 and 2022. We then establish the individual determinants of loneliness and compare them to those found in the literature predating the COVID-19 pandemic. As in previous work, women are lonelier, and partnership, education, income, and employment protect against loneliness. However, the pandemic substantially shifted the age profile: it is now the youngest who are the loneliest. We last show that pandemic policies affected loneliness, which rose with containment policies but fell with government economic support. Conversely, the intensity of the pandemic itself, via the number of recent COVID-19 deaths, had only a minor impact. The experience of the pandemic has thus shown that public policy can influence societal loneliness trends.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50554,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Human Biology","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 101427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X24000790/pdfft?md5=03d9fd00bd5b0d18514bd27a02be094d&pid=1-s2.0-S1570677X24000790-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from five European countries\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Rebechi ,&nbsp;Anthony Lepinteur ,&nbsp;Andrew E. Clark ,&nbsp;Nicholas Rohde ,&nbsp;Claus Vögele ,&nbsp;Conchita D’Ambrosio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehb.2024.101427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We use quarterly panel data from the COME-HERE survey covering five European countries to analyse three facets of the experience of loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, in terms of prevalence, loneliness peaked in April 2020, followed by a U-shape pattern in the rest of 2020, and then remained relatively stable throughout 2021 and 2022. We then establish the individual determinants of loneliness and compare them to those found in the literature predating the COVID-19 pandemic. As in previous work, women are lonelier, and partnership, education, income, and employment protect against loneliness. However, the pandemic substantially shifted the age profile: it is now the youngest who are the loneliest. We last show that pandemic policies affected loneliness, which rose with containment policies but fell with government economic support. Conversely, the intensity of the pandemic itself, via the number of recent COVID-19 deaths, had only a minor impact. The experience of the pandemic has thus shown that public policy can influence societal loneliness trends.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Human Biology\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X24000790/pdfft?md5=03d9fd00bd5b0d18514bd27a02be094d&pid=1-s2.0-S1570677X24000790-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X24000790\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X24000790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们利用来自 COME-HERE 调查的季度面板数据(覆盖五个欧洲国家),分析了 COVID-19 大流行期间孤独体验的三个方面。首先,就流行率而言,孤独感在 2020 年 4 月达到顶峰,随后在 2020 年剩余时间内呈现 U 型模式,然后在整个 2021 年和 2022 年保持相对稳定。然后,我们确定了孤独的个体决定因素,并将其与 COVID-19 大流行之前的文献中发现的因素进行比较。与之前的研究结果一样,女性更孤独,而伴侣关系、教育、收入和就业则可防止孤独。然而,大流行大大改变了年龄分布:现在最孤独的是最年轻的人。我们最后指出,大流行病的政策影响了孤独感,孤独感随着遏制政策的实施而上升,但随着政府的经济支持而下降。相反,通过最近 COVID-19 死亡人数来看,大流行病本身的强度只产生了很小的影响。因此,大流行病的经验表明,公共政策可以影响社会的孤独趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from five European countries

We use quarterly panel data from the COME-HERE survey covering five European countries to analyse three facets of the experience of loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, in terms of prevalence, loneliness peaked in April 2020, followed by a U-shape pattern in the rest of 2020, and then remained relatively stable throughout 2021 and 2022. We then establish the individual determinants of loneliness and compare them to those found in the literature predating the COVID-19 pandemic. As in previous work, women are lonelier, and partnership, education, income, and employment protect against loneliness. However, the pandemic substantially shifted the age profile: it is now the youngest who are the loneliest. We last show that pandemic policies affected loneliness, which rose with containment policies but fell with government economic support. Conversely, the intensity of the pandemic itself, via the number of recent COVID-19 deaths, had only a minor impact. The experience of the pandemic has thus shown that public policy can influence societal loneliness trends.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics & Human Biology
Economics & Human Biology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics and Human Biology is devoted to the exploration of the effect of socio-economic processes on human beings as biological organisms. Research covered in this (quarterly) interdisciplinary journal is not bound by temporal or geographic limitations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信