Wan-Yu Chu, Luka Verrest, Brima M Younis, Ahmed M Musa, Jane Mbui, Rezika Mohammed, Joseph Olobo, Koert Ritmeijer, Séverine Monnerat, Monique Wasunna, Ignace C Roseboom, Alexandra Solomos, Alwin D R Huitema, Fabiana Alves, Thomas P C Dorlo
{"title":"非洲东部卡拉-扎尔皮肤利什曼病和内脏利什曼病患者服用帕罗霉素和米替福新的药代动力学因疾病而异。","authors":"Wan-Yu Chu, Luka Verrest, Brima M Younis, Ahmed M Musa, Jane Mbui, Rezika Mohammed, Joseph Olobo, Koert Ritmeijer, Séverine Monnerat, Monique Wasunna, Ignace C Roseboom, Alexandra Solomos, Alwin D R Huitema, Fabiana Alves, Thomas P C Dorlo","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment regimens for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) are usually extrapolated from those for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but drug pharmacokinetics (PK) can differ due to disease-specific variations in absorption, distribution, and elimination. This study characterized PK differences in paromomycin and miltefosine between 109 PKDL and 264 VL patients from Eastern Africa. VL patients showed 0.55-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], .41-.74) lower capacity for paromomycin saturable reabsorption in renal tubules, and required a 1.44-fold (95% CI, 1.23-1.71) adjustment when relating renal clearance to creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate. Miltefosine bioavailability in VL patients was lowered by 69% (95% CI, 62%-76%) at treatment start. Comparing PKDL to VL patients on the same regimen, paromomycin plasma exposures were 0.74- to 0.87-fold, while miltefosine exposure until the end of treatment day was 1.4-fold. These pronounced PK differences between PKDL and VL patients in Eastern Africa highlight the challenges of directly extrapolating dosing regimens from one leishmaniasis presentation to another.</p>","PeriodicalId":50179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"e1375-e1384"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease-Specific Differences in Pharmacokinetics of Paromomycin and Miltefosine Between Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis and Visceral Leishmaniasis Patients in Eastern Africa.\",\"authors\":\"Wan-Yu Chu, Luka Verrest, Brima M Younis, Ahmed M Musa, Jane Mbui, Rezika Mohammed, Joseph Olobo, Koert Ritmeijer, Séverine Monnerat, Monique Wasunna, Ignace C Roseboom, Alexandra Solomos, Alwin D R Huitema, Fabiana Alves, Thomas P C Dorlo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiae413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Treatment regimens for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) are usually extrapolated from those for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but drug pharmacokinetics (PK) can differ due to disease-specific variations in absorption, distribution, and elimination. This study characterized PK differences in paromomycin and miltefosine between 109 PKDL and 264 VL patients from Eastern Africa. VL patients showed 0.55-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], .41-.74) lower capacity for paromomycin saturable reabsorption in renal tubules, and required a 1.44-fold (95% CI, 1.23-1.71) adjustment when relating renal clearance to creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate. Miltefosine bioavailability in VL patients was lowered by 69% (95% CI, 62%-76%) at treatment start. Comparing PKDL to VL patients on the same regimen, paromomycin plasma exposures were 0.74- to 0.87-fold, while miltefosine exposure until the end of treatment day was 1.4-fold. These pronounced PK differences between PKDL and VL patients in Eastern Africa highlight the challenges of directly extrapolating dosing regimens from one leishmaniasis presentation to another.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1375-e1384\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11646621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disease-Specific Differences in Pharmacokinetics of Paromomycin and Miltefosine Between Post-Kala-Azar Dermal Leishmaniasis and Visceral Leishmaniasis Patients in Eastern Africa.
Treatment regimens for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) are usually extrapolated from those for visceral leishmaniasis (VL), but drug pharmacokinetics (PK) can differ due to disease-specific variations in absorption, distribution, and elimination. This study characterized PK differences in paromomycin and miltefosine between 109 PKDL and 264 VL patients from Eastern Africa. VL patients showed 0.55-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], .41-.74) lower capacity for paromomycin saturable reabsorption in renal tubules, and required a 1.44-fold (95% CI, 1.23-1.71) adjustment when relating renal clearance to creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate. Miltefosine bioavailability in VL patients was lowered by 69% (95% CI, 62%-76%) at treatment start. Comparing PKDL to VL patients on the same regimen, paromomycin plasma exposures were 0.74- to 0.87-fold, while miltefosine exposure until the end of treatment day was 1.4-fold. These pronounced PK differences between PKDL and VL patients in Eastern Africa highlight the challenges of directly extrapolating dosing regimens from one leishmaniasis presentation to another.
期刊介绍:
Published continuously since 1904, The Journal of Infectious Diseases (JID) is the premier global journal for original research on infectious diseases. The editors welcome Major Articles and Brief Reports describing research results on microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and related disciplines, on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases; on the microbes that cause them; and on disorders of host immune responses. JID is an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.