影响采用斜腰椎椎间融合间接减压术效果的因素。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrey E Bokov, Svetlana Y Kalinina, Mingiyan I Khaltyrov, Alexandr P Saifullin, Anatoliy A Bulkin
{"title":"影响采用斜腰椎椎间融合间接减压术效果的因素。","authors":"Andrey E Bokov, Svetlana Y Kalinina, Mingiyan I Khaltyrov, Alexandr P Saifullin, Anatoliy A Bulkin","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect decompression is one of the potential benefits of anterior reconstruction in patients with spinal stenosis. On the other hand, the reported rate of revision surgery after indirect decompression highlights the necessity of working out prediction models for the radiographic results of indirect decompression with assessing their clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess factors that influence radiographic and clinical results of the indirect decompression in patients with stenosis of the lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a single-center cross-sectional evaluation of 80 consecutive patients (17 males and 63 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with the instability of the lumbar spinal segment. Patients underwent single level or bisegmental spinal instrumentation employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic results of the indirect decompression were assessed using computerized tomography, while MacNab scale was used to assess clinical results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction using OLIF, the statistically significant increase in the disc space height, vertebral canal square, right and left lateral canal depth were detected (<i>Р</i> < 0.0001). The median (<i>M</i>) relative vertebral canal square increase came to <i>М</i> = 24.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (16.3%; 33.3%) if indirect decompression was achieved by restoration of the segment height. In patients with the reduction of the upper vertebrae slip, the median of the relative increase in vertebral canal square accounted for 49.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (2.35; 99.75). Six out of 80 patients (7.5%) presented with unsatisfactory results because of residual nerve root compression. The critical values for lateral recess depth and vertebral canal square that were associated with indirect decompression failure were 3 mm and 80 mm<sup>2</sup> respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction is achieved by the increase in disc height along the posterior boarder and reduction of the slipped vertebrae in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Vertebral canal square below 80 mm<sup>2</sup> and lateral recess depth less than 3 mm are associated with indirect decompression failures that require direct microsurgical decompression.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331328/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that influence the results of indirect decompression employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Andrey E Bokov, Svetlana Y Kalinina, Mingiyan I Khaltyrov, Alexandr P Saifullin, Anatoliy A Bulkin\",\"doi\":\"10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indirect decompression is one of the potential benefits of anterior reconstruction in patients with spinal stenosis. On the other hand, the reported rate of revision surgery after indirect decompression highlights the necessity of working out prediction models for the radiographic results of indirect decompression with assessing their clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess factors that influence radiographic and clinical results of the indirect decompression in patients with stenosis of the lumbar spine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a single-center cross-sectional evaluation of 80 consecutive patients (17 males and 63 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with the instability of the lumbar spinal segment. Patients underwent single level or bisegmental spinal instrumentation employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic results of the indirect decompression were assessed using computerized tomography, while MacNab scale was used to assess clinical results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction using OLIF, the statistically significant increase in the disc space height, vertebral canal square, right and left lateral canal depth were detected (<i>Р</i> < 0.0001). The median (<i>M</i>) relative vertebral canal square increase came to <i>М</i> = 24.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (16.3%; 33.3%) if indirect decompression was achieved by restoration of the segment height. In patients with the reduction of the upper vertebrae slip, the median of the relative increase in vertebral canal square accounted for 49.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (2.35; 99.75). Six out of 80 patients (7.5%) presented with unsatisfactory results because of residual nerve root compression. The critical values for lateral recess depth and vertebral canal square that were associated with indirect decompression failure were 3 mm and 80 mm<sup>2</sup> respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction is achieved by the increase in disc height along the posterior boarder and reduction of the slipped vertebrae in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Vertebral canal square below 80 mm<sup>2</sup> and lateral recess depth less than 3 mm are associated with indirect decompression failures that require direct microsurgical decompression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331328/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:间接减压是椎管狭窄患者前路重建的潜在优势之一。目的:评估影响腰椎管狭窄患者间接减压术后影像学和临床效果的因素:本研究是一项单中心横断面评估,连续评估了 80 名腰椎管狭窄合并腰椎段不稳定的患者(男性 17 名,女性 63 名)。患者接受了单水平或双节段脊柱器械治疗,采用经皮椎弓根螺钉固定的斜行腰椎椎体间融合术(OLIF)。采用计算机断层扫描评估间接减压的影像学效果,同时使用 MacNab 量表评估临床效果:结果:采用 OLIF 前路重建间接减压后,椎间盘间隙高度、椎管方度、左右侧椎管深度均有显著增加(Р < 0.0001)。如果通过恢复节段高度实现间接减压,椎管方形相对增加的中位数(M)为М = 24.5%,25%-75%的四分位边界为(16.3%;33.3%)。在上椎体滑脱减少的患者中,椎管方形相对增加的中位数占49.5%,25%-75%四分位边界(2.35;99.75)。80 例患者中有 6 例(7.5%)因残留神经根压迫而效果不理想。与间接减压失败相关的侧凹深度和椎管平方的临界值分别为3毫米和80平方毫米:结论:对于退行性脊椎滑脱症患者,采用前路重建的间接减压术是通过增加后路椎间盘高度和减少滑脱椎体来实现的。椎管方形小于80平方毫米和侧凹深度小于3毫米与间接减压失败有关,需要进行显微外科直接减压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors that influence the results of indirect decompression employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Background: Indirect decompression is one of the potential benefits of anterior reconstruction in patients with spinal stenosis. On the other hand, the reported rate of revision surgery after indirect decompression highlights the necessity of working out prediction models for the radiographic results of indirect decompression with assessing their clinical relevance.

Aim: To assess factors that influence radiographic and clinical results of the indirect decompression in patients with stenosis of the lumbar spine.

Methods: This study is a single-center cross-sectional evaluation of 80 consecutive patients (17 males and 63 females) with lumbar spinal stenosis combined with the instability of the lumbar spinal segment. Patients underwent single level or bisegmental spinal instrumentation employing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Radiographic results of the indirect decompression were assessed using computerized tomography, while MacNab scale was used to assess clinical results.

Results: After indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction using OLIF, the statistically significant increase in the disc space height, vertebral canal square, right and left lateral canal depth were detected (Р < 0.0001). The median (M) relative vertebral canal square increase came to М = 24.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (16.3%; 33.3%) if indirect decompression was achieved by restoration of the segment height. In patients with the reduction of the upper vertebrae slip, the median of the relative increase in vertebral canal square accounted for 49.5% with 25%-75% quartile border (2.35; 99.75). Six out of 80 patients (7.5%) presented with unsatisfactory results because of residual nerve root compression. The critical values for lateral recess depth and vertebral canal square that were associated with indirect decompression failure were 3 mm and 80 mm2 respectively.

Conclusion: Indirect decompression employing anterior reconstruction is achieved by the increase in disc height along the posterior boarder and reduction of the slipped vertebrae in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Vertebral canal square below 80 mm2 and lateral recess depth less than 3 mm are associated with indirect decompression failures that require direct microsurgical decompression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信