创新益生菌制剂用于局部治疗糖尿病溃疡的潜在治疗策略:一项体内研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Farkhonde Karimi, Nima Montazeri-Najafabady, Fatemeh Mohammadi, Amir Azadi, Farhad Koohpeyma, Ahmad Gholami
{"title":"创新益生菌制剂用于局部治疗糖尿病溃疡的潜在治疗策略:一项体内研究。","authors":"Farkhonde Karimi, Nima Montazeri-Najafabady, Fatemeh Mohammadi, Amir Azadi, Farhad Koohpeyma, Ahmad Gholami","doi":"10.1038/s41387-024-00320-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The probiotic potential of Lacticacid bacteria has been studied in various medical complications, from gastrointestinal diseases to antibiotic resistance infections recently. Moreover, diabetic ulcer (DU) is known as one of the most significant global healthcare concerns, which comprehensively impacts the quality of life for these patients. Given that the conventional treatments of DUs have failed to prevent later complications completely, developing alternative therapies seems to be crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed the stable oleogel-based formulation of viable probiotic cells, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus), Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), Lactobacillus fermentum (L. fermentum), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) individually to investigate their effect on wound healing process as an in vivo study. The wound repair process was closely monitored regarding morphology, biochemical, and histopathological changes over two weeks and compared it with the effects of topical tetracycline as an antibiotic approach. Furthermore, the antibiofilm activity of probiotic bacteria was assessed against some common pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that all tested lactobacillus groups (excluded L. casei) included in the oleogel-based formulation revealed a high potential for repairing damaged skin due to the considerably more levels of hydroxyproline content of tissue samples along with the higher numerical density of mature fibroblasts cell and volume density of hair follicles, collagen fibrils, and neovascularization in comparison with antibiotic and control groups. L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus showed the best potential of wound healing among all lactobacillus species, groups treated by tetracycline and control groups. Besides, L. rhamnosus showed a significant biofilm inhibition activity against tested pathogens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experiment demonstrated that the designed formulations containing probiotics, particularly L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus, play a central role in manipulating diabetic wound healing. It could be suggested as an encouraging nominee for diabetic wound-healing alternative approaches, though further studies in detailed clinical trials are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19339,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A potential therapeutic strategy of an innovative probiotic formulation toward topical treatment of diabetic ulcer: an in vivo study.\",\"authors\":\"Farkhonde Karimi, Nima Montazeri-Najafabady, Fatemeh Mohammadi, Amir Azadi, Farhad Koohpeyma, Ahmad Gholami\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41387-024-00320-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The probiotic potential of Lacticacid bacteria has been studied in various medical complications, from gastrointestinal diseases to antibiotic resistance infections recently. Moreover, diabetic ulcer (DU) is known as one of the most significant global healthcare concerns, which comprehensively impacts the quality of life for these patients. Given that the conventional treatments of DUs have failed to prevent later complications completely, developing alternative therapies seems to be crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We designed the stable oleogel-based formulation of viable probiotic cells, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus), Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), Lactobacillus fermentum (L. fermentum), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) individually to investigate their effect on wound healing process as an in vivo study. The wound repair process was closely monitored regarding morphology, biochemical, and histopathological changes over two weeks and compared it with the effects of topical tetracycline as an antibiotic approach. Furthermore, the antibiofilm activity of probiotic bacteria was assessed against some common pathogens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings indicated that all tested lactobacillus groups (excluded L. casei) included in the oleogel-based formulation revealed a high potential for repairing damaged skin due to the considerably more levels of hydroxyproline content of tissue samples along with the higher numerical density of mature fibroblasts cell and volume density of hair follicles, collagen fibrils, and neovascularization in comparison with antibiotic and control groups. L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus showed the best potential of wound healing among all lactobacillus species, groups treated by tetracycline and control groups. Besides, L. rhamnosus showed a significant biofilm inhibition activity against tested pathogens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experiment demonstrated that the designed formulations containing probiotics, particularly L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus, play a central role in manipulating diabetic wound healing. It could be suggested as an encouraging nominee for diabetic wound-healing alternative approaches, though further studies in detailed clinical trials are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition & Diabetes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11335896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition & Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00320-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-024-00320-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近,乳酸菌的益生潜能已被用于研究从胃肠道疾病到抗生素耐药性感染等各种医疗并发症。此外,众所周知,糖尿病溃疡(DU)是全球最重要的医疗保健问题之一,全面影响着这些患者的生活质量。鉴于糖尿病溃疡的传统治疗方法无法完全预防后期并发症,开发替代疗法似乎至关重要:方法:我们设计了基于油凝胶的稳定益生菌细胞制剂,包括鼠李糖乳杆菌(L. rhamnosus)、干酪乳杆菌(L. casei)、发酵乳杆菌(L. fermentum)和嗜酸乳杆菌(L. acidophilus),作为一项体内研究来探讨它们对伤口愈合过程的影响。研究人员密切监测了两周内伤口修复过程中的形态、生化和组织病理学变化,并将其与局部使用四环素作为抗生素的效果进行了比较。此外,还评估了益生菌对一些常见病原体的抗生物膜活性:结果:研究结果表明,与抗生素组和对照组相比,油凝胶配方中的所有受试乳酸菌组(不包括干酪乳杆菌)都具有修复受损皮肤的巨大潜力,因为组织样本中的羟脯氨酸含量更高,成熟成纤维细胞的数量密度更高,毛囊、胶原纤维和新生血管的体积密度也更高。嗜酸乳杆菌和鼠李糖杆菌在所有乳酸杆菌种类、四环素治疗组和对照组中显示出最佳的伤口愈合潜力。此外,鼠李糖杆菌对测试病原体具有显著的生物膜抑制活性:本实验表明,所设计的含有益生菌(尤其是嗜酸乳杆菌和鼠李糖杆菌)的配方在控制糖尿病伤口愈合方面发挥了重要作用。尽管还需要在详细的临床试验中进行进一步的研究,但它可以作为糖尿病伤口愈合替代方法的一个令人鼓舞的提名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A potential therapeutic strategy of an innovative probiotic formulation toward topical treatment of diabetic ulcer: an in vivo study.

A potential therapeutic strategy of an innovative probiotic formulation toward topical treatment of diabetic ulcer: an in vivo study.

Background: The probiotic potential of Lacticacid bacteria has been studied in various medical complications, from gastrointestinal diseases to antibiotic resistance infections recently. Moreover, diabetic ulcer (DU) is known as one of the most significant global healthcare concerns, which comprehensively impacts the quality of life for these patients. Given that the conventional treatments of DUs have failed to prevent later complications completely, developing alternative therapies seems to be crucial.

Methods: We designed the stable oleogel-based formulation of viable probiotic cells, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus), Lactobacillus casei (L. casei), Lactobacillus fermentum (L. fermentum), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) individually to investigate their effect on wound healing process as an in vivo study. The wound repair process was closely monitored regarding morphology, biochemical, and histopathological changes over two weeks and compared it with the effects of topical tetracycline as an antibiotic approach. Furthermore, the antibiofilm activity of probiotic bacteria was assessed against some common pathogens.

Results: The findings indicated that all tested lactobacillus groups (excluded L. casei) included in the oleogel-based formulation revealed a high potential for repairing damaged skin due to the considerably more levels of hydroxyproline content of tissue samples along with the higher numerical density of mature fibroblasts cell and volume density of hair follicles, collagen fibrils, and neovascularization in comparison with antibiotic and control groups. L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus showed the best potential of wound healing among all lactobacillus species, groups treated by tetracycline and control groups. Besides, L. rhamnosus showed a significant biofilm inhibition activity against tested pathogens.

Conclusions: This experiment demonstrated that the designed formulations containing probiotics, particularly L. acidophilus and L. rhamnosus, play a central role in manipulating diabetic wound healing. It could be suggested as an encouraging nominee for diabetic wound-healing alternative approaches, though further studies in detailed clinical trials are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Diabetes
Nutrition & Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Diabetes is a peer-reviewed, online, open access journal bringing to the fore outstanding research in the areas of nutrition and chronic disease, including diabetes, from the molecular to the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信