Kyeongho Jeon, Minho Song, Jihwan Lee, Hanjin Oh, Dongcheol Song, Seyeon Chang, Jaewoo An, Hyunah Cho, Sehyun Park, Hyeunbum Kim, Jinho Cho
{"title":"单一益生菌和复合益生菌对生长育肥猪和猪堆肥的影响。","authors":"Kyeongho Jeon, Minho Song, Jihwan Lee, Hanjin Oh, Dongcheol Song, Seyeon Chang, Jaewoo An, Hyunah Cho, Sehyun Park, Hyeunbum Kim, Jinho Cho","doi":"10.5187/jast.2024.e88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to supplement single and complex probiotics to investigate the effect on growing-finishing pigs and compost. In experiment 1, the 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 18.75 ± 0.33 kg and a birth of 63 days were assigned to a completely randomized four treatment groups based on the initial body weight (4 pigs in a pen with 4 replicate pens for each treatment). For 13 weeks, the dietary treatments were provided: 1) Control (CON; basal diet), 2) T1 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>), 3) T2 (CON + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>), 4) T3 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>). In experiment 2, the pig manure was obtained from Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Korea) swine farm. For 12 weeks, the supplementary treatments were provided: 1) CON, non-additive compost; 2) T1, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 3) T2, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 4) T3, spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 5) T4: spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 6) T5, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 5 g + <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 5 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 7) T6, spray <i>Saccharomyces subtilis</i> 20 g + <i>S. cerevisiae</i> 20 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup> and there were 6 replicates each treatment. In experiment 1, During the overall experimental period, T3 showed significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) feed conversion ratio and average daily gain compared to other groups. In average maturity score, T3 showed significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than other groups. Supplementing complex probiotics group improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) H2S emissions and fecal microflora compared to the non-supplementing group. In experiment 2, additive probiotics groups had no effect (<i>p</i> > 0.05) on moisture content than the non-additive group at 9 and 12 weeks. T6 showed a significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) average maturity score at all periods and ammonia emissions at 1 week and 4 weeks compared to other groups. In summary, supplementation complex probiotics induced positive effects on both pigs and compost.</p>","PeriodicalId":14923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of single and complex probiotics in growing-finishing pigs and swine compost.\",\"authors\":\"Kyeongho Jeon, Minho Song, Jihwan Lee, Hanjin Oh, Dongcheol Song, Seyeon Chang, Jaewoo An, Hyunah Cho, Sehyun Park, Hyeunbum Kim, Jinho Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.5187/jast.2024.e88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was conducted to supplement single and complex probiotics to investigate the effect on growing-finishing pigs and compost. In experiment 1, the 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 18.75 ± 0.33 kg and a birth of 63 days were assigned to a completely randomized four treatment groups based on the initial body weight (4 pigs in a pen with 4 replicate pens for each treatment). For 13 weeks, the dietary treatments were provided: 1) Control (CON; basal diet), 2) T1 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>), 3) T2 (CON + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>), 4) T3 (CON + 0.2% <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> + 0.2% <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>). In experiment 2, the pig manure was obtained from Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Korea) swine farm. For 12 weeks, the supplementary treatments were provided: 1) CON, non-additive compost; 2) T1, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 3) T2, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 4) T3, spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 10 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 5) T4: spray <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 40 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 6) T5, spray <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> 5 g + <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> 5 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup>; 7) T6, spray <i>Saccharomyces subtilis</i> 20 g + <i>S. cerevisiae</i> 20 g per 3.306 m<sup>2</sup> and there were 6 replicates each treatment. In experiment 1, During the overall experimental period, T3 showed significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) feed conversion ratio and average daily gain compared to other groups. In average maturity score, T3 showed significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than other groups. Supplementing complex probiotics group improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) H2S emissions and fecal microflora compared to the non-supplementing group. In experiment 2, additive probiotics groups had no effect (<i>p</i> > 0.05) on moisture content than the non-additive group at 9 and 12 weeks. T6 showed a significantly improved (<i>p</i> < 0.05) average maturity score at all periods and ammonia emissions at 1 week and 4 weeks compared to other groups. In summary, supplementation complex probiotics induced positive effects on both pigs and compost.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11331375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2024.e88\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2024.e88","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of single and complex probiotics in growing-finishing pigs and swine compost.
This study was conducted to supplement single and complex probiotics to investigate the effect on growing-finishing pigs and compost. In experiment 1, the 64 crossbred ([Landrace × Yorkshire] × Duroc) pigs with an initial body weight of 18.75 ± 0.33 kg and a birth of 63 days were assigned to a completely randomized four treatment groups based on the initial body weight (4 pigs in a pen with 4 replicate pens for each treatment). For 13 weeks, the dietary treatments were provided: 1) Control (CON; basal diet), 2) T1 (CON + 0.2% Bacillus subtilis), 3) T2 (CON + 0.2% Saccharomyces cerevisiae), 4) T3 (CON + 0.2% Bacillus subtilis + 0.2% Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In experiment 2, the pig manure was obtained from Chungbuk National University (Cheongju, Korea) swine farm. For 12 weeks, the supplementary treatments were provided: 1) CON, non-additive compost; 2) T1, spray Bacillus subtilis 10 g per 3.306 m2; 3) T2, spray Bacillus subtilis 40 g per 3.306 m2; 4) T3, spray Saccharomyces cerevisiae 10 g per 3.306 m2; 5) T4: spray Saccharomyces cerevisiae 40 g per 3.306 m2; 6) T5, spray Bacillus subtilis 5 g + Saccharomyces cerevisiae 5 g per 3.306 m2; 7) T6, spray Saccharomyces subtilis 20 g + S. cerevisiae 20 g per 3.306 m2 and there were 6 replicates each treatment. In experiment 1, During the overall experimental period, T3 showed significantly improved (p < 0.05) feed conversion ratio and average daily gain compared to other groups. In average maturity score, T3 showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) than other groups. Supplementing complex probiotics group improved (p < 0.05) H2S emissions and fecal microflora compared to the non-supplementing group. In experiment 2, additive probiotics groups had no effect (p > 0.05) on moisture content than the non-additive group at 9 and 12 weeks. T6 showed a significantly improved (p < 0.05) average maturity score at all periods and ammonia emissions at 1 week and 4 weeks compared to other groups. In summary, supplementation complex probiotics induced positive effects on both pigs and compost.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Sci. Technol. or JAST) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing original research, review articles and notes in all fields of animal science.
Topics covered by the journal include: genetics and breeding, physiology, nutrition of monogastric animals, nutrition of ruminants, animal products (milk, meat, eggs and their by-products) and their processing, grasslands and roughages, livestock environment, animal biotechnology, animal behavior and welfare.
Articles generally report research involving beef cattle, dairy cattle, pigs, companion animals, goats, horses, and sheep. However, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will also be considered for publication.
The Journal of Animal Science and Technology (J. Anim. Technol. or JAST) has been the official journal of The Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) since 2000, formerly known as The Korean Journal of Animal Sciences (launched in 1956).