利用超高分辨率光谱光子计数 CT 对极高风险患者的冠状动脉狭窄进行定量分析

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Guillaume Fahrni, Sara Boccalini, Allal Mahmoudi, Hugo Lacombe, Angèle Houmeau, Meyer Elbaz, David Rotzinger, Marjorie Villien, Thomas Bochaton, Philippe Douek, Salim A Si-Mohamed
{"title":"利用超高分辨率光谱光子计数 CT 对极高风险患者的冠状动脉狭窄进行定量分析","authors":"Guillaume Fahrni, Sara Boccalini, Allal Mahmoudi, Hugo Lacombe, Angèle Houmeau, Meyer Elbaz, David Rotzinger, Marjorie Villien, Thomas Bochaton, Philippe Douek, Salim A Si-Mohamed","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development of spectral photon-counting computed tomography (SPCCT) for ultra-high-resolution coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to accurately evaluate the coronary arteries of very-high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of SPCCT against conventional CT for quantifying coronary stenosis in very-high-risk patients, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, very-high-risk patients addressed for ICA following an acute coronary syndrome were consecutively included. CCTA was performed for each patient with both SPCCT and conventional CT before ICA within 3 days. Stenoses were assessed using the minimal diameter over proximal and distal diameters method for CCTA and the quantitative coronary angiography method for ICA. Intraclass correlation coefficients and mean errors were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a >50% diameter stenosis threshold. Reclassification rates for conventional CT and SPCCT were assessed according to CAD-RADS 2.0, using ICA as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six coronary stenoses were identified in 26 patients (4 women [15%]; age 64 ± 8 years) with 19 (73%) above 50% and 9 (35%) equal or above 70%. The median stenosis value was 64% (interquartile range, 48%-73%). SPCCT showed a lower mean error (6% [5%, 8%]) than conventional CT (12% [9%, 16%]). SPCCT demonstrated greater sensitivity (100%) and specificity (90%) than conventional CT (75% and 50%, respectively). Ten (38%) stenoses were reclassified with SPCCT and one (4%) with conventional CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In very-high-risk patients, ultra-high-resolution SPCCT coronary angiography showed greater accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and led to more stenosis reclassifications than conventional CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT.\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Fahrni, Sara Boccalini, Allal Mahmoudi, Hugo Lacombe, Angèle Houmeau, Meyer Elbaz, David Rotzinger, Marjorie Villien, Thomas Bochaton, Philippe Douek, Salim A Si-Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Development of spectral photon-counting computed tomography (SPCCT) for ultra-high-resolution coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to accurately evaluate the coronary arteries of very-high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of SPCCT against conventional CT for quantifying coronary stenosis in very-high-risk patients, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, very-high-risk patients addressed for ICA following an acute coronary syndrome were consecutively included. CCTA was performed for each patient with both SPCCT and conventional CT before ICA within 3 days. Stenoses were assessed using the minimal diameter over proximal and distal diameters method for CCTA and the quantitative coronary angiography method for ICA. Intraclass correlation coefficients and mean errors were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a >50% diameter stenosis threshold. Reclassification rates for conventional CT and SPCCT were assessed according to CAD-RADS 2.0, using ICA as the gold standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six coronary stenoses were identified in 26 patients (4 women [15%]; age 64 ± 8 years) with 19 (73%) above 50% and 9 (35%) equal or above 70%. The median stenosis value was 64% (interquartile range, 48%-73%). SPCCT showed a lower mean error (6% [5%, 8%]) than conventional CT (12% [9%, 16%]). SPCCT demonstrated greater sensitivity (100%) and specificity (90%) than conventional CT (75% and 50%, respectively). Ten (38%) stenoses were reclassified with SPCCT and one (4%) with conventional CT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In very-high-risk patients, ultra-high-resolution SPCCT coronary angiography showed greater accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and led to more stenosis reclassifications than conventional CT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001109\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001109","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用于超高分辨率冠状动脉 CT 血管造影术(CCTA)的光谱光子计数计算机断层扫描(SPCCT)有望准确评估极高风险患者的冠状动脉。本研究旨在以有创冠状动脉造影术(ICA)为参照方法,比较 SPCCT 与传统 CT 在量化极高风险患者冠状动脉狭窄方面的诊断性能:在这项经机构审查委员会批准的前瞻性研究中,连续纳入了急性冠状动脉综合征后接受有创冠状动脉造影术的极高危患者。每位患者都在 3 天内进行了 CCTA,并在 ICA 前进行了 SPCCT 和传统 CT 检查。CCTA 采用近端和远端直径的最小直径法评估血管狭窄,而 ICA 则采用定量冠状动脉造影法。评估了类内相关系数和平均误差。计算了直径狭窄>50%阈值的敏感性和特异性。以 ICA 为金标准,根据 CAD-RADS 2.0 评估了传统 CT 和 SPCCT 的重新分类率:在 26 名患者(4 名女性[15%];年龄 64 ± 8 岁)中发现了 26 处冠状动脉狭窄,其中 19 处(73%)超过 50%,9 处(35%)等于或超过 70%。中位狭窄值为 64%(四分位间范围为 48%-73%)。SPCCT 显示的平均误差(6% [5%, 8%] )低于传统 CT(12% [9%, 16%])。SPCCT 的灵敏度(100%)和特异性(90%)均高于传统 CT(分别为 75% 和 50%)。使用 SPCCT 对 10 个(38%)血管狭窄进行了重新分类,使用传统 CT 对 1 个(4%)血管狭窄进行了重新分类:结论:对于极高风险患者,超高分辨率 SPCCT 冠状动脉造影术比传统 CT 显示出更高的准确性、灵敏度和特异性,并能对更多狭窄进行重新分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT.

Objective: Development of spectral photon-counting computed tomography (SPCCT) for ultra-high-resolution coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has the potential to accurately evaluate the coronary arteries of very-high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of SPCCT against conventional CT for quantifying coronary stenosis in very-high-risk patients, with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method.

Materials and methods: In this prospective institutional review board-approved study, very-high-risk patients addressed for ICA following an acute coronary syndrome were consecutively included. CCTA was performed for each patient with both SPCCT and conventional CT before ICA within 3 days. Stenoses were assessed using the minimal diameter over proximal and distal diameters method for CCTA and the quantitative coronary angiography method for ICA. Intraclass correlation coefficients and mean errors were assessed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a >50% diameter stenosis threshold. Reclassification rates for conventional CT and SPCCT were assessed according to CAD-RADS 2.0, using ICA as the gold standard.

Results: Twenty-six coronary stenoses were identified in 26 patients (4 women [15%]; age 64 ± 8 years) with 19 (73%) above 50% and 9 (35%) equal or above 70%. The median stenosis value was 64% (interquartile range, 48%-73%). SPCCT showed a lower mean error (6% [5%, 8%]) than conventional CT (12% [9%, 16%]). SPCCT demonstrated greater sensitivity (100%) and specificity (90%) than conventional CT (75% and 50%, respectively). Ten (38%) stenoses were reclassified with SPCCT and one (4%) with conventional CT.

Conclusions: In very-high-risk patients, ultra-high-resolution SPCCT coronary angiography showed greater accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and led to more stenosis reclassifications than conventional CT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信