Philipp Trénel, Finn Boesen, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Thor Petersen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Michael Nørgaard
{"title":"揭开康复治疗的黑匣子:多学科多发性硬化症康复的短期和长期效应差异。","authors":"Philipp Trénel, Finn Boesen, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Thor Petersen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Michael Nørgaard","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MFA groups varied in age (<i>P</i> = .036), MS type (<i>P</i> = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (<i>P</i> < .001), time since diagnosis (<i>P</i> = .002), and FAMS at baseline (<i>P</i> < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, <i>P</i> < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 (<i>P</i> =.001), 5.6 (<i>P</i> = .196), 8.5 (<i>P</i> = .008), -1.4 (<i>P</i> = .548), and 17.9 (<i>P</i> = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"26 Q3","pages":"224-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shedding Light on the Black Box of Rehabilitation: Differential Short- and Long-Term Effects of Multidisciplinary Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Trénel, Finn Boesen, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Thor Petersen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Michael Nørgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MFA groups varied in age (<i>P</i> = .036), MS type (<i>P</i> = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (<i>P</i> < .001), time since diagnosis (<i>P</i> = .002), and FAMS at baseline (<i>P</i> < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, <i>P</i> < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 (<i>P</i> =.001), 5.6 (<i>P</i> = .196), 8.5 (<i>P</i> = .008), -1.4 (<i>P</i> = .548), and 17.9 (<i>P</i> = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\"26 Q3\",\"pages\":\"224-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Shedding Light on the Black Box of Rehabilitation: Differential Short- and Long-Term Effects of Multidisciplinary Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation.
Background: The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.
Methods: We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.
Results: MFA groups varied in age (P = .036), MS type (P = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .001), time since diagnosis (P = .002), and FAMS at baseline (P < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, P < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 (P =.001), 5.6 (P = .196), 8.5 (P = .008), -1.4 (P = .548), and 17.9 (P = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.