揭开康复治疗的黑匣子:多学科多发性硬化症康复的短期和长期效应差异。

Q1 Nursing
International journal of MS care Pub Date : 2024-08-19 eCollection Date: 2024-05-01 DOI:10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071
Philipp Trénel, Finn Boesen, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Thor Petersen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Michael Nørgaard
{"title":"揭开康复治疗的黑匣子:多学科多发性硬化症康复的短期和长期效应差异。","authors":"Philipp Trénel, Finn Boesen, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Thor Petersen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Michael Nørgaard","doi":"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MFA groups varied in age (<i>P</i> = .036), MS type (<i>P</i> = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (<i>P</i> < .001), time since diagnosis (<i>P</i> = .002), and FAMS at baseline (<i>P</i> < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, <i>P</i> < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 (<i>P</i> =.001), 5.6 (<i>P</i> = .196), 8.5 (<i>P</i> = .008), -1.4 (<i>P</i> = .548), and 17.9 (<i>P</i> = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14150,"journal":{"name":"International journal of MS care","volume":"26 Q3","pages":"224-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shedding Light on the Black Box of Rehabilitation: Differential Short- and Long-Term Effects of Multidisciplinary Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Trénel, Finn Boesen, Anders Guldhammer Skjerbæk, Thor Petersen, Peter Vestergaard Rasmussen, Michael Nørgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MFA groups varied in age (<i>P</i> = .036), MS type (<i>P</i> = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (<i>P</i> < .001), time since diagnosis (<i>P</i> = .002), and FAMS at baseline (<i>P</i> < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, <i>P</i> < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 (<i>P</i> =.001), 5.6 (<i>P</i> = .196), 8.5 (<i>P</i> = .008), -1.4 (<i>P</i> = .548), and 17.9 (<i>P</i> = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"volume\":\"26 Q3\",\"pages\":\"224-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11333915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of MS care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of MS care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2022-071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究多学科康复(MDR)的有效性,以及多发性硬化症(MS)患者的症状和需求如何与多学科康复干预的多样性相互作用,仍然是一个难题,通常被称为黑箱:我们进行了一项部分交叉随机对照试验,分别在 1 个月(出院)、6 个月和 12 个月进行随访。根据康复目标,每位患者在入院前被分为 5 个主要重点领域(MFA)中的 1 个:复原力、认知功能、能量、身体功能和个人需求。多发性硬化症功能评估(FAMS)工具的评分是主要结果:多发性硬化症功能评估组在年龄(P = .036)、多发性硬化症类型(P = .002)、残疾状况扩展量表评分(P < .001)、确诊时间(P = .002)、基线时的 FAMS(P < .001)以及多发性硬化症康复服务的组成和数量方面存在差异。出院时,所有 5 个 MFA 组的 FAMS 均有明显改善(FAMS 变化 > 10.4,P < .05),但各 MFA 组受影响的子维度和改善的持续时间各不相同。在 6 个月的随访中,复原力组、认知功能组、能量组、身体功能组和个人需求组的 FAMS 受控差异估计值分别为 9.9 (P=.001)、5.6 (P = .196)、8.5 (P = .008)、-1.4 (P = .548) 和 17.9 (P=.012):本研究表明,住院多发性硬化症康复治疗可改善多发性硬化症患者的功能和与健康相关的生活质量;获益的类型、程度和持续性与患者的主要康复重点领域相关,这表明目标设定过程在多发性硬化症康复治疗中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shedding Light on the Black Box of Rehabilitation: Differential Short- and Long-Term Effects of Multidisciplinary Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation.

Background: The study of the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (MDR) and how the symptoms and needs of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) interplay with the diversity of MDR interventions is still a conundrum, often referred to as a black box.

Methods: We conducted a partial crossover randomized controlled trial with follow-ups at 1 (discharge), 6, and 12 months. Based on their rehabilitation goals, each patient was categorized into 1 of 5 main focus areas (MFAs) prior to admission: Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) instrument scores were the primary outcome.

Results: MFA groups varied in age (P = .036), MS type (P = .002), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .001), time since diagnosis (P = .002), and FAMS at baseline (P < .001), as well as in composition and quantity of MDR services. At discharge, significant FAMS improvements were found in all 5 MFA groups (FAMS change > 10.4, P < .05), but the affected subdimensions and persistence of improvements varied among MFA groups. At the 6-month follow-up, estimates of controlled differences in FAMS were 9.9 (P =.001), 5.6 (P = .196), 8.5 (P = .008), -1.4 (P = .548), and 17.9 (P = .012) for the Resilience, Cognitive Function, Energy, Physical Function, and Personal Needs groups, respectively.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that inpatient MDR improves functioning and health-related quality of life in people with MS; the type, degree, and persistence of the benefits are associated with a patient's main focus area of rehabilitation, which signifies the importance of the goal-setting process in MDR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of MS care
International journal of MS care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信