使用 Biosen S-Line 和乳酸侦察兵分析仪测量耳垂和指尖毛细血管血液中乳酸含量的比较。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Fogen Zhong, Zhili Chen, Zhengqiu Gu, Xinxin Wang, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Yongming Li
{"title":"使用 Biosen S-Line 和乳酸侦察兵分析仪测量耳垂和指尖毛细血管血液中乳酸含量的比较。","authors":"Fogen Zhong, Zhili Chen, Zhengqiu Gu, Xinxin Wang, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Yongming Li","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare variations between the earlobe and fingertip sampling sites in exercises dominated by upper body muscle exertion. It also sought to investigate capillary blood lactate differences between Lactate Scout 4 (LS4) and a bench-top analyzer (Biosen S-Line analyzer, BSL) during Double Poling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from the earlobe and fingertip immediately before exercise, at the end of each of five stages, and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-min post-exercise. Forty healthy university students participated as volunteers. During the study, they performed double poling on a ski ergometer with progressively increasing load. Lactate levels were measured using both the BSL and LS4 analyzers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fingertip Bla values were significantly higher than earlobe values, with a mean bias of -0.66 mmol/L, reaching -0.86 mmol/L in the 4-8 mmol/L range. At the earlobe, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-a was 0.84 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-b, it was 0.85 (> 8 mmol/L). At the fingertip, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-c was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-d, it was 0.52 (> 8 mmol/L). Comparing LS4-a and LS4-b at the earlobe, the highest CCC was 0.83 (0-4 mmol/L). At the fingertip, comparing LS4-c and LS4-d, the highest CCC was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood lactate concentrations are higher at the fingertip than the earlobe during SkiErg double poling. The LS4 is less reliable, especially at the fingertip, so using the earlobe with the BSL analyzer is recommended for accurate measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of lactate measurements from earlobe and fingertip capillary blood using Biosen S-Line and lactate scout analyzers.\",\"authors\":\"Fogen Zhong, Zhili Chen, Zhengqiu Gu, Xinxin Wang, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Yongming Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare variations between the earlobe and fingertip sampling sites in exercises dominated by upper body muscle exertion. It also sought to investigate capillary blood lactate differences between Lactate Scout 4 (LS4) and a bench-top analyzer (Biosen S-Line analyzer, BSL) during Double Poling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from the earlobe and fingertip immediately before exercise, at the end of each of five stages, and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-min post-exercise. Forty healthy university students participated as volunteers. During the study, they performed double poling on a ski ergometer with progressively increasing load. Lactate levels were measured using both the BSL and LS4 analyzers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fingertip Bla values were significantly higher than earlobe values, with a mean bias of -0.66 mmol/L, reaching -0.86 mmol/L in the 4-8 mmol/L range. At the earlobe, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-a was 0.84 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-b, it was 0.85 (> 8 mmol/L). At the fingertip, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-c was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-d, it was 0.52 (> 8 mmol/L). Comparing LS4-a and LS4-b at the earlobe, the highest CCC was 0.83 (0-4 mmol/L). At the fingertip, comparing LS4-c and LS4-d, the highest CCC was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blood lactate concentrations are higher at the fingertip than the earlobe during SkiErg double poling. The LS4 is less reliable, especially at the fingertip, so using the earlobe with the BSL analyzer is recommended for accurate measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05585-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较在以上半身肌肉用力为主的运动中耳垂和指尖取样部位之间的差异。研究还试图调查在双杠运动中乳酸侦测器 4(LS4)和台式分析仪(Biosen S-Line 分析仪,BSL)之间毛细血管血乳酸的差异:方法:分别在运动前、运动后 1、3、5 和 7 分钟的五个阶段结束时从耳垂和指尖采集血液样本。40 名健康大学生作为志愿者参与了研究。在研究过程中,他们在滑雪测力计上进行双桨运动,负荷逐渐增加。使用 BSL 和 LS4 分析仪测量乳酸水平:结果:指尖 Bla 值明显高于耳垂值,平均偏差为 -0.66 mmol/L,在 4-8 mmol/L 范围内达到 -0.86 mmol/L。在耳垂,BSL 和 LS4-a 之间的最高 CCC 为 0.84(> 8 毫摩尔/升),BSL 和 LS4-b 之间的最高 CCC 为 0.85(> 8 毫摩尔/升)。在指尖,BSL 和 LS4-c 的最高 CCC 为 0.68(> 8 毫摩尔/升),BSL 和 LS4-d 的最高 CCC 为 0.52(> 8 毫摩尔/升)。比较耳垂处的 LS4-a 和 LS4-b,最高 CCC 为 0.83(0-4 毫摩尔/升)。在指尖,比较 LS4-c 和 LS4-d,最高 CCC 为 0.68(> 8 mmol/L):结论:SkiErg 双杆滑雪时,指尖的血液乳酸浓度高于耳垂。LS4 的可靠性较低,尤其是指尖处,因此建议使用耳垂和 BSL 分析仪进行精确测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of lactate measurements from earlobe and fingertip capillary blood using Biosen S-Line and lactate scout analyzers.

Comparison of lactate measurements from earlobe and fingertip capillary blood using Biosen S-Line and lactate scout analyzers.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare variations between the earlobe and fingertip sampling sites in exercises dominated by upper body muscle exertion. It also sought to investigate capillary blood lactate differences between Lactate Scout 4 (LS4) and a bench-top analyzer (Biosen S-Line analyzer, BSL) during Double Poling.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from the earlobe and fingertip immediately before exercise, at the end of each of five stages, and at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-min post-exercise. Forty healthy university students participated as volunteers. During the study, they performed double poling on a ski ergometer with progressively increasing load. Lactate levels were measured using both the BSL and LS4 analyzers.

Results: Fingertip Bla values were significantly higher than earlobe values, with a mean bias of -0.66 mmol/L, reaching -0.86 mmol/L in the 4-8 mmol/L range. At the earlobe, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-a was 0.84 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-b, it was 0.85 (> 8 mmol/L). At the fingertip, the highest CCC between BSL and LS4-c was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L), and for BSL and LS4-d, it was 0.52 (> 8 mmol/L). Comparing LS4-a and LS4-b at the earlobe, the highest CCC was 0.83 (0-4 mmol/L). At the fingertip, comparing LS4-c and LS4-d, the highest CCC was 0.68 (> 8 mmol/L).

Conclusions: Blood lactate concentrations are higher at the fingertip than the earlobe during SkiErg double poling. The LS4 is less reliable, especially at the fingertip, so using the earlobe with the BSL analyzer is recommended for accurate measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信