流式细胞仪检测修改:基于 CLSI H62 指南的方法验证建议。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Sara A Monaghan, Steven Eck, Silvia Bunting, Xiangyang X Dong, Robert J Durso, Christele Gonneau, Amanda Hays, Andrea Illingworth, Stacy C League, Eleni Linskens, Megan McCausland, Thomas W McCloskey, Nina Rolf, Min Shi, Paul K Wallace, Virginia Litwin, Wolfgang Kern, George Deeb, Veronica Nash, Horatiu Olteanu
{"title":"流式细胞仪检测修改:基于 CLSI H62 指南的方法验证建议。","authors":"Sara A Monaghan, Steven Eck, Silvia Bunting, Xiangyang X Dong, Robert J Durso, Christele Gonneau, Amanda Hays, Andrea Illingworth, Stacy C League, Eleni Linskens, Megan McCausland, Thomas W McCloskey, Nina Rolf, Min Shi, Paul K Wallace, Virginia Litwin, Wolfgang Kern, George Deeb, Veronica Nash, Horatiu Olteanu","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62-Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit-for-purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory-initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).</p>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flow cytometry assay modifications: Recommendations for method validation based on CLSI H62 guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Sara A Monaghan, Steven Eck, Silvia Bunting, Xiangyang X Dong, Robert J Durso, Christele Gonneau, Amanda Hays, Andrea Illingworth, Stacy C League, Eleni Linskens, Megan McCausland, Thomas W McCloskey, Nina Rolf, Min Shi, Paul K Wallace, Virginia Litwin, Wolfgang Kern, George Deeb, Veronica Nash, Horatiu Olteanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cyto.b.22202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62-Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit-for-purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory-initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.22202\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.22202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI)于 2021 年发布的《H62--流式细胞术检测的验证》指南为平台工作流程和质量体系要点、仪器设置和标准化、检测开发和优化以及适合目的的分析方法验证提供了建议。此外,CLSI H62 还对已验证的流式细胞分析方法修改后的验证策略提出了一些建议。本手稿以这些建议为基础,讨论了不同类型的检测方法修改对检测性能的影响。文中还提供了根据修改类型评估哪些验证参数的建议。还讨论了化验修改对化验预期用途的影响。在建议对实验室发起的检测方法修订(如灵敏度、特异性或精密度研究的标本数量)略微偏离 CLSI H62 流程时,我们会提供基于专家意见的理由,但我们也明白,本文并不能全面涵盖所有实验室、检测方法类型和情况。这些建议只是一种实用性建议,并不具有限制性、规范性,也不能理解为一定能满足监管机构(如美国食品及药物管理局或纽约州卫生局)的所有具体要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Flow cytometry assay modifications: Recommendations for method validation based on CLSI H62 guidelines.

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) H62-Validation of Assays Performed by Flow Cytometry guideline, released in 2021, provides recommendations for platform workflow and quality system essentials, instrument setup and standardization, assay development and optimization and fit-for-purpose analytical method validation. In addition, CLSI H62 includes some recommendations for the validation strategies after a validated flow cytometric method has been modified. This manuscript builds on those recommendations and discusses the impact of different types of assay modifications on assay performance. Recommendations regarding which validation parameters to evaluate depending on the type of modification are provided. The impact of assay modification on the assay's intended use is discussed. When recommending minor deviations from the CLSI H62 process for a laboratory-initiated assay revision (e.g., specimen numbers for sensitivity, specificity, or precision studies), a rationale based on expert opinion is provided with the understanding that not every laboratory, assay type, and circumstance can be comprehensively addressed in this paper. These recommendations are meant as a practical recommendation and are not intended to be restrictive, prescriptive, or understood as necessarily sufficient to meet every specific requirement from regulatory bodies (e.g., FDA or New York State Department of Health).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信