中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率在代谢综合征中的预测作用:对 70,937 人进行的元分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zhiqiang Qiu, Chahua Huang, Congcong Xu, Yan Xu
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率在代谢综合征中的预测作用:对 70,937 人进行的元分析。","authors":"Zhiqiang Qiu, Chahua Huang, Congcong Xu, Yan Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01689-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular diseases and metabolic diseases. The role of NLR in metabolic syndrome (MS) has also been explored albeit with conflicting results. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive role of NLR in MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the predictive role of NLR in MS. Cochrane library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception to December 2023. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was followed. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A randomeffect model was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty six studies enrolling 70,937 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the individuals without MS, NLR value was significantly higher in the patients of MS (mean difference (MD) 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.27-0.52, P < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%). The derived NLR value also was significantly higher in participants with MS than those without MS (MD 0.48, 95%CI: 0.13-0.84, P = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). There was no statistically significant association for NLR between the patients with 4 metabolic risk factors (MRF) and those with 3 MRF, or between patients with 5 MRF and those with 4 MRF (MD 0.16, 95%CI: -0.02-0.35, P = 0.10, I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; MD 0.12, 95%CI: -0.06-0.29, P = 0.20, I<sup>2</sup> = 68%). However, MS patients with 5 MRF had a significantly higher mean NLR value than those with 3MRF (MD 0.37, 95%CI: 0.05-0.68, P = 0.02, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%). Compared with the individuals with low NLR, incidence of MS was significantly higher in those with high NLR (OR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.25-3.98, P = 0.006, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our meta-analysis suggested that the value of NLR and derived NLR were higher in MS patients. MS patients with 5 MRF had a significantly higher mean NLR value. High NLR also demonstrated a significantly increased the incidence of MS. NLR may be a good predictive biomarker in MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metabolic syndrome: Meta-analysis of 70,937 individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqiang Qiu, Chahua Huang, Congcong Xu, Yan Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12902-024-01689-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular diseases and metabolic diseases. The role of NLR in metabolic syndrome (MS) has also been explored albeit with conflicting results. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive role of NLR in MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the predictive role of NLR in MS. Cochrane library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception to December 2023. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was followed. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A randomeffect model was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty six studies enrolling 70,937 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the individuals without MS, NLR value was significantly higher in the patients of MS (mean difference (MD) 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.27-0.52, P < 0.00001, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%). The derived NLR value also was significantly higher in participants with MS than those without MS (MD 0.48, 95%CI: 0.13-0.84, P = 0.007, I<sup>2</sup> = 96%). There was no statistically significant association for NLR between the patients with 4 metabolic risk factors (MRF) and those with 3 MRF, or between patients with 5 MRF and those with 4 MRF (MD 0.16, 95%CI: -0.02-0.35, P = 0.10, I<sup>2</sup> = 84%; MD 0.12, 95%CI: -0.06-0.29, P = 0.20, I<sup>2</sup> = 68%). However, MS patients with 5 MRF had a significantly higher mean NLR value than those with 3MRF (MD 0.37, 95%CI: 0.05-0.68, P = 0.02, I<sup>2</sup> = 92%). Compared with the individuals with low NLR, incidence of MS was significantly higher in those with high NLR (OR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.25-3.98, P = 0.006, I<sup>2</sup> = 97%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our meta-analysis suggested that the value of NLR and derived NLR were higher in MS patients. MS patients with 5 MRF had a significantly higher mean NLR value. High NLR also demonstrated a significantly increased the incidence of MS. NLR may be a good predictive biomarker in MS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Endocrine Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01689-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01689-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)已被证明是心血管疾病和代谢性疾病的独立预测指标。也有人探讨了 NLR 在代谢综合征(MS)中的作用,但结果相互矛盾。本研究旨在评估 NLR 在 MS 中的预测作用:我们对观察性研究进行了荟萃分析,以评估 NLR 在 MS 中的预测作用。我们系统检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Medline、Embase 和 Scopus 中从开始到 2023 年 12 月的所有研究。研究遵循了系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。统计分析使用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行。结果:本次荟萃分析共纳入了 26 项研究,研究对象达 70,937 人。与非多发性硬化症患者相比,多发性硬化症患者的 NLR 值明显更高(平均差(MD)0.40,95% 置信区间(CI):0.27-0.52,P 2 = 97%)。多发性硬化症患者的 NLR 值也明显高于非多发性硬化症患者(MD 0.48,95% 置信区间:0.13-0.84,P = 0.007,I2 = 96%)。有4个代谢风险因素(MRF)的患者与有3个MRF的患者之间,或有5个MRF的患者与有4个MRF的患者之间,NLR均无统计学意义(MD 0.16,95%CI:-0.02-0.35,P = 0.10,I2 = 84%;MD 0.12,95%CI:-0.06-0.29,P = 0.20,I2 = 68%)。然而,有5个MRF的多发性硬化症患者的平均NLR值明显高于有3个MRF的患者(MD 0.37,95%CI:0.05-0.68,P = 0.02,I2 = 92%)。与 NLR 值低的人相比,NLR 值高的人多发性硬化症的发病率明显更高(OR 2.23,95%CI:1.25-3.98,P = 0.006,I2 = 97%):我们的荟萃分析结果表明,多发性硬化症患者的 NLR 和衍生 NLR 值较高。有 5 个 MRF 的多发性硬化症患者的平均 NLR 值明显更高。高 NLR 也表明多发性硬化症的发病率明显增加。NLR可能是预测多发性硬化症的良好生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metabolic syndrome: Meta-analysis of 70,937 individuals.

Objective: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular diseases and metabolic diseases. The role of NLR in metabolic syndrome (MS) has also been explored albeit with conflicting results. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive role of NLR in MS.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the predictive role of NLR in MS. Cochrane library, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception to December 2023. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was followed. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. A randomeffect model was used.

Results: Twenty six studies enrolling 70,937 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the individuals without MS, NLR value was significantly higher in the patients of MS (mean difference (MD) 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.27-0.52, P < 0.00001, I2 = 97%). The derived NLR value also was significantly higher in participants with MS than those without MS (MD 0.48, 95%CI: 0.13-0.84, P = 0.007, I2 = 96%). There was no statistically significant association for NLR between the patients with 4 metabolic risk factors (MRF) and those with 3 MRF, or between patients with 5 MRF and those with 4 MRF (MD 0.16, 95%CI: -0.02-0.35, P = 0.10, I2 = 84%; MD 0.12, 95%CI: -0.06-0.29, P = 0.20, I2 = 68%). However, MS patients with 5 MRF had a significantly higher mean NLR value than those with 3MRF (MD 0.37, 95%CI: 0.05-0.68, P = 0.02, I2 = 92%). Compared with the individuals with low NLR, incidence of MS was significantly higher in those with high NLR (OR 2.23, 95%CI: 1.25-3.98, P = 0.006, I2 = 97%).

Conclusion: The findings of our meta-analysis suggested that the value of NLR and derived NLR were higher in MS patients. MS patients with 5 MRF had a significantly higher mean NLR value. High NLR also demonstrated a significantly increased the incidence of MS. NLR may be a good predictive biomarker in MS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信