{"title":"利用从污泥焚烧灰中回收的磷酸盐和铁以及从浓盐水中提取的锂合成 LiFePO4","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Phosphorus (P) recovered from sludge-incinerated ash (SIA) could be applied to synthesize highly added-value products (FePO<sub>4</sub> and LiFePO<sub>4</sub>) with <em>in situ</em> Fe in SIA. Indeed, LiFePO<sub>4</sub> is a future of rechargeable batteries, which makes lithium (Li) highly needed. Alternatively, Li could also be extracted from concentrated brines to face a potential crisis of Li depletion on lands. Based on H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sup>3+</sup> co-extracted from the acidic leachate of SIA by tributyl phosphate (TBP), FePO<sub>4</sub> (31.2 wt% Fe, 17.6 wt% P and the molar ratio of Fe/P = 0.98) was easily formed only adjusting pH of the stripping solution to 1.6. Interestingly, the organic phase from the first-stage co-extraction process of Fe<sup>3+</sup> and H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> could be utilized for Li-extraction from salt-lake brine, based on the TBP-FeCl<sub>3</sub>-kerosene system, and a good performance (78.7%) of Li-extraction and separation factors (<em>β</em>) (186.0–217.4) were obtained. Furthermore, the compounds with Li-extraction are complex, possibly LiFeCl<sub>4</sub>∙2TBP, in which Li<sup>+</sup> could be stripped to form Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> by 4.0 M HCl (with a stripping rate up to 83%). Besides, Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> could also be obtained from desalinated brine by adsorption with manganese oxide ion sieve (HMO) and desorption with HCl. In the two cases, almost pure Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> products were obtained, up to 99.7 and 99.5 wt% Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> respectively, after further purification and concentration. Finally, recovered FePO<sub>4</sub> and extracted Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> were synthesized for producing LiFePO<sub>4</sub> that had a similar electrochemical property (69.5 and 77.8 mAh/g of the initial discharge capacity) to those synthesized from commercial raw materials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":443,"journal":{"name":"Water Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthesizing LiFePO4 by phosphate & iron recovered from sludge-incinerated ash and Li extracted from concentrated brines\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.watres.2024.122261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Phosphorus (P) recovered from sludge-incinerated ash (SIA) could be applied to synthesize highly added-value products (FePO<sub>4</sub> and LiFePO<sub>4</sub>) with <em>in situ</em> Fe in SIA. Indeed, LiFePO<sub>4</sub> is a future of rechargeable batteries, which makes lithium (Li) highly needed. Alternatively, Li could also be extracted from concentrated brines to face a potential crisis of Li depletion on lands. Based on H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> and Fe<sup>3+</sup> co-extracted from the acidic leachate of SIA by tributyl phosphate (TBP), FePO<sub>4</sub> (31.2 wt% Fe, 17.6 wt% P and the molar ratio of Fe/P = 0.98) was easily formed only adjusting pH of the stripping solution to 1.6. Interestingly, the organic phase from the first-stage co-extraction process of Fe<sup>3+</sup> and H<sub>3</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> could be utilized for Li-extraction from salt-lake brine, based on the TBP-FeCl<sub>3</sub>-kerosene system, and a good performance (78.7%) of Li-extraction and separation factors (<em>β</em>) (186.0–217.4) were obtained. Furthermore, the compounds with Li-extraction are complex, possibly LiFeCl<sub>4</sub>∙2TBP, in which Li<sup>+</sup> could be stripped to form Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> by 4.0 M HCl (with a stripping rate up to 83%). Besides, Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> could also be obtained from desalinated brine by adsorption with manganese oxide ion sieve (HMO) and desorption with HCl. In the two cases, almost pure Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> products were obtained, up to 99.7 and 99.5 wt% Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> respectively, after further purification and concentration. Finally, recovered FePO<sub>4</sub> and extracted Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> were synthesized for producing LiFePO<sub>4</sub> that had a similar electrochemical property (69.5 and 77.8 mAh/g of the initial discharge capacity) to those synthesized from commercial raw materials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424011606\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135424011606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Synthesizing LiFePO4 by phosphate & iron recovered from sludge-incinerated ash and Li extracted from concentrated brines
Phosphorus (P) recovered from sludge-incinerated ash (SIA) could be applied to synthesize highly added-value products (FePO4 and LiFePO4) with in situ Fe in SIA. Indeed, LiFePO4 is a future of rechargeable batteries, which makes lithium (Li) highly needed. Alternatively, Li could also be extracted from concentrated brines to face a potential crisis of Li depletion on lands. Based on H3PO4 and Fe3+ co-extracted from the acidic leachate of SIA by tributyl phosphate (TBP), FePO4 (31.2 wt% Fe, 17.6 wt% P and the molar ratio of Fe/P = 0.98) was easily formed only adjusting pH of the stripping solution to 1.6. Interestingly, the organic phase from the first-stage co-extraction process of Fe3+ and H3PO4 could be utilized for Li-extraction from salt-lake brine, based on the TBP-FeCl3-kerosene system, and a good performance (78.7%) of Li-extraction and separation factors (β) (186.0–217.4) were obtained. Furthermore, the compounds with Li-extraction are complex, possibly LiFeCl4∙2TBP, in which Li+ could be stripped to form Li2CO3 by 4.0 M HCl (with a stripping rate up to 83%). Besides, Li2CO3 could also be obtained from desalinated brine by adsorption with manganese oxide ion sieve (HMO) and desorption with HCl. In the two cases, almost pure Li2CO3 products were obtained, up to 99.7 and 99.5 wt% Li2CO3 respectively, after further purification and concentration. Finally, recovered FePO4 and extracted Li2CO3 were synthesized for producing LiFePO4 that had a similar electrochemical property (69.5 and 77.8 mAh/g of the initial discharge capacity) to those synthesized from commercial raw materials.
期刊介绍:
Water Research, along with its open access companion journal Water Research X, serves as a platform for publishing original research papers covering various aspects of the science and technology related to the anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, and its management worldwide. The audience targeted by the journal comprises biologists, chemical engineers, chemists, civil engineers, environmental engineers, limnologists, and microbiologists. The scope of the journal include:
•Treatment processes for water and wastewaters (municipal, agricultural, industrial, and on-site treatment), including resource recovery and residuals management;
•Urban hydrology including sewer systems, stormwater management, and green infrastructure;
•Drinking water treatment and distribution;
•Potable and non-potable water reuse;
•Sanitation, public health, and risk assessment;
•Anaerobic digestion, solid and hazardous waste management, including source characterization and the effects and control of leachates and gaseous emissions;
•Contaminants (chemical, microbial, anthropogenic particles such as nanoparticles or microplastics) and related water quality sensing, monitoring, fate, and assessment;
•Anthropogenic impacts on inland, tidal, coastal and urban waters, focusing on surface and ground waters, and point and non-point sources of pollution;
•Environmental restoration, linked to surface water, groundwater and groundwater remediation;
•Analysis of the interfaces between sediments and water, and between water and atmosphere, focusing specifically on anthropogenic impacts;
•Mathematical modelling, systems analysis, machine learning, and beneficial use of big data related to the anthropogenic water cycle;
•Socio-economic, policy, and regulations studies.