农业实践对爱沙尼亚蚯蚓群落的影响

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Merit Sutri , Mari Ivask , Annely Kuu , Jordi Escuer-Gatius , Endla Reintam , Merrit Shanskiy
{"title":"农业实践对爱沙尼亚蚯蚓群落的影响","authors":"Merit Sutri ,&nbsp;Mari Ivask ,&nbsp;Annely Kuu ,&nbsp;Jordi Escuer-Gatius ,&nbsp;Endla Reintam ,&nbsp;Merrit Shanskiy","doi":"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earthworms support and mediate the provision of many processes in the soil. They are therefore important in maintaining soil functioning and contribute towards the sustainability of soil management systems. Assessment of earthworm communities can provide answers regarding the land management conservation efforts and insight on soil quality. The main aim of this study was to assess the impact of farming (organic vs conventional) and tillage (no-tillage vs minimum tillage vs conventional tillage) systems on earthworm communities under varying soil conditions in arable fields across Estonia. To achieve this, we compiled data from studies carried out over a period of 21 years on Estonian arable fields. While organic farming and conventional farming showed a similar earthworm abundance, earthworm diversity was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) under the organic system. Higher abundance, species richness, and the proportion of anecic species suggest that a no-tillage system creates the most favourable habitat conditions for earthworms. Soil texture further influenced the effect of management system on earthworm abundance and diversity indexes. For example, the differences in earthworm abundance and diversity between the management systems increased from lighter textured to heavier textured soils. Our results suggest that soil texture is a major factor influencing earthworm communities in Estonian agricultural fields and emphasizes the importance of including different soil texture classes when assessing the effects of agricultural management practices in field-scale studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12057,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Biology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of agricultural practices on earthworm communities in Estonia\",\"authors\":\"Merit Sutri ,&nbsp;Mari Ivask ,&nbsp;Annely Kuu ,&nbsp;Jordi Escuer-Gatius ,&nbsp;Endla Reintam ,&nbsp;Merrit Shanskiy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earthworms support and mediate the provision of many processes in the soil. They are therefore important in maintaining soil functioning and contribute towards the sustainability of soil management systems. Assessment of earthworm communities can provide answers regarding the land management conservation efforts and insight on soil quality. The main aim of this study was to assess the impact of farming (organic vs conventional) and tillage (no-tillage vs minimum tillage vs conventional tillage) systems on earthworm communities under varying soil conditions in arable fields across Estonia. To achieve this, we compiled data from studies carried out over a period of 21 years on Estonian arable fields. While organic farming and conventional farming showed a similar earthworm abundance, earthworm diversity was significantly higher (p &lt; 0.05) under the organic system. Higher abundance, species richness, and the proportion of anecic species suggest that a no-tillage system creates the most favourable habitat conditions for earthworms. Soil texture further influenced the effect of management system on earthworm abundance and diversity indexes. For example, the differences in earthworm abundance and diversity between the management systems increased from lighter textured to heavier textured soils. Our results suggest that soil texture is a major factor influencing earthworm communities in Estonian agricultural fields and emphasizes the importance of including different soil texture classes when assessing the effects of agricultural management practices in field-scale studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Soil Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1164556324000682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蚯蚓为土壤中的许多过程提供支持和中介。因此,蚯蚓对维持土壤功能非常重要,并有助于土壤管理系统的可持续性。对蚯蚓群落的评估可以为土地管理保护工作提供答案,并有助于深入了解土壤质量。这项研究的主要目的是评估在爱沙尼亚各地耕地的不同土壤条件下,耕作(有机耕作与传统耕作)和耕作(免耕与少耕与传统耕作)系统对蚯蚓群落的影响。为此,我们汇编了爱沙尼亚耕地 21 年来的研究数据。虽然有机耕作和常规耕作显示出相似的蚯蚓数量,但有机耕作系统下的蚯蚓多样性明显更高(p < 0.05)。较高的丰度、物种丰富度和轶群物种比例表明,免耕系统为蚯蚓创造了最有利的栖息地条件。土壤质地进一步影响了管理系统对蚯蚓丰度和多样性指数的影响。例如,从质地较轻的土壤到质地较重的土壤,不同管理系统之间蚯蚓数量和多样性的差异都在增加。我们的研究结果表明,土壤质地是影响爱沙尼亚农田中蚯蚓群落的一个主要因素,并强调了在田间尺度研究中评估农业管理方法的影响时纳入不同土壤质地等级的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effects of agricultural practices on earthworm communities in Estonia

The effects of agricultural practices on earthworm communities in Estonia

Earthworms support and mediate the provision of many processes in the soil. They are therefore important in maintaining soil functioning and contribute towards the sustainability of soil management systems. Assessment of earthworm communities can provide answers regarding the land management conservation efforts and insight on soil quality. The main aim of this study was to assess the impact of farming (organic vs conventional) and tillage (no-tillage vs minimum tillage vs conventional tillage) systems on earthworm communities under varying soil conditions in arable fields across Estonia. To achieve this, we compiled data from studies carried out over a period of 21 years on Estonian arable fields. While organic farming and conventional farming showed a similar earthworm abundance, earthworm diversity was significantly higher (p < 0.05) under the organic system. Higher abundance, species richness, and the proportion of anecic species suggest that a no-tillage system creates the most favourable habitat conditions for earthworms. Soil texture further influenced the effect of management system on earthworm abundance and diversity indexes. For example, the differences in earthworm abundance and diversity between the management systems increased from lighter textured to heavier textured soils. Our results suggest that soil texture is a major factor influencing earthworm communities in Estonian agricultural fields and emphasizes the importance of including different soil texture classes when assessing the effects of agricultural management practices in field-scale studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Biology
European Journal of Soil Biology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Soil Biology covers all aspects of soil biology which deal with microbial and faunal ecology and activity in soils, as well as natural ecosystems or biomes connected to ecological interests: biodiversity, biological conservation, adaptation, impact of global changes on soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning and effects and fate of pollutants as influenced by soil organisms. Different levels in ecosystem structure are taken into account: individuals, populations, communities and ecosystems themselves. At each level, different disciplinary approaches are welcomed: molecular biology, genetics, ecophysiology, ecology, biogeography and landscape ecology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信