颅内动脉瘤血管内引流的经循环方法:系统回顾与技术考虑。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael M Covell, Chandrasekhar Palepu, Georgios S Sioutas, Thomas P Stirrat, Stefan T Prvulovic, Saarang Patel, Sandeep Kandregula, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan
{"title":"颅内动脉瘤血管内引流的经循环方法:系统回顾与技术考虑。","authors":"Michael M Covell, Chandrasekhar Palepu, Georgios S Sioutas, Thomas P Stirrat, Stefan T Prvulovic, Saarang Patel, Sandeep Kandregula, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Flow diversion (FD) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is an increasingly used and efficacious treatment modality. Transcirculation approaches, or approaches that cross the contralateral or anteroposterior arterial supply before reaching a target vessel, have been used to treat cerebrovascular pathologies when traditional approaches are unsuitable or require intraoperative complication management. This study sought to review IAs treated with FD using a transcirculation approach to determine the technique's safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was completed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they described transcirculation approaches in adult patients with IAs undergoing FD. Outcomes of interest included intraoperative complications and aneurysm occlusion rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies with 19 patients (N = 19, mean age = 54.1 y, 89.5% female) were identified. Wide-necked (N = 5, 26.3%) and saccular (N = 5, 26.3%) aneurysms were most represented, while 57.9% (N = 11) of aneurysms were unruptured and 15.8% (N = 3) of aneurysms were ruptured. The mean aneurysm sac and neck size were 16.9 mm and 11.9 mm, respectively. The most commonly deployed flow diverter was the Pipeline Embolization Device (N = 14, 73.9%). Successful FD (complete occlusion and/or good wall apposition) was recorded in 84.6% of qualifying patients with follow-up data, while 2 patients (15.4%) developed an intraoperative carotid-cavernous fistula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcirculation approaches to FD offer neurointerventionalists a safe and efficacious method for device deployment, rescue scenarios, and challenging anatomy. Prospective studies may determine the most appropriate indications for transcirculation approaches to FD, while novel, lower profile devices may improve its technical feasibility and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcirculation Approaches to Endovascular Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review With Technical Considerations.\",\"authors\":\"Michael M Covell, Chandrasekhar Palepu, Georgios S Sioutas, Thomas P Stirrat, Stefan T Prvulovic, Saarang Patel, Sandeep Kandregula, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Visish M Srinivasan\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/ons.0000000000001320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Flow diversion (FD) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is an increasingly used and efficacious treatment modality. Transcirculation approaches, or approaches that cross the contralateral or anteroposterior arterial supply before reaching a target vessel, have been used to treat cerebrovascular pathologies when traditional approaches are unsuitable or require intraoperative complication management. This study sought to review IAs treated with FD using a transcirculation approach to determine the technique's safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was completed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they described transcirculation approaches in adult patients with IAs undergoing FD. Outcomes of interest included intraoperative complications and aneurysm occlusion rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies with 19 patients (N = 19, mean age = 54.1 y, 89.5% female) were identified. Wide-necked (N = 5, 26.3%) and saccular (N = 5, 26.3%) aneurysms were most represented, while 57.9% (N = 11) of aneurysms were unruptured and 15.8% (N = 3) of aneurysms were ruptured. The mean aneurysm sac and neck size were 16.9 mm and 11.9 mm, respectively. The most commonly deployed flow diverter was the Pipeline Embolization Device (N = 14, 73.9%). Successful FD (complete occlusion and/or good wall apposition) was recorded in 84.6% of qualifying patients with follow-up data, while 2 patients (15.4%) developed an intraoperative carotid-cavernous fistula.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcirculation approaches to FD offer neurointerventionalists a safe and efficacious method for device deployment, rescue scenarios, and challenging anatomy. Prospective studies may determine the most appropriate indications for transcirculation approaches to FD, while novel, lower profile devices may improve its technical feasibility and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operative Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001320\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:颅内动脉瘤(IAs)的血流转向(FD)是一种应用日益广泛、疗效显著的治疗方式。当传统方法不适合或需要术中并发症处理时,经循环方法或在到达目标血管前穿过对侧或前胸动脉供血的方法已被用于治疗脑血管病变。本研究试图回顾使用经循环方法进行 FD 治疗的内脏病变,以确定该技术的安全性和有效性:方法:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)指南,对 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统综述。如果研究描述了在接受 FD 的 IAs 成年患者中采用的跨循环方法,则将其纳入研究范围。研究结果包括术中并发症和动脉瘤闭塞率:结果:共确定了 12 项研究,涉及 19 名患者(N = 19,平均年龄 = 54.1 岁,89.5% 为女性)。宽颈(5 例,26.3%)和囊状(5 例,26.3%)动脉瘤占多数,57.9%(11 例)的动脉瘤未破裂,15.8%(3 例)的动脉瘤破裂。动脉瘤囊和瘤颈的平均尺寸分别为 16.9 毫米和 11.9 毫米。最常用的血流分流器是管道栓塞装置(14 个,73.9%)。在有随访数据的合格患者中,84.6%的患者成功进行了FD(完全闭塞和/或壁贴合良好),而2名患者(15.4%)在术中出现了颈动脉-海绵体瘘:结论:经血液循环的 FD 方法为神经介入医生提供了一种安全有效的方法,可用于设备部署、抢救方案和具有挑战性的解剖结构。前瞻性研究可确定经血循环方法用于 FD 的最适当适应症,而新型、低剖面装置可提高其技术可行性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcirculation Approaches to Endovascular Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review With Technical Considerations.

Background and objectives: Flow diversion (FD) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is an increasingly used and efficacious treatment modality. Transcirculation approaches, or approaches that cross the contralateral or anteroposterior arterial supply before reaching a target vessel, have been used to treat cerebrovascular pathologies when traditional approaches are unsuitable or require intraoperative complication management. This study sought to review IAs treated with FD using a transcirculation approach to determine the technique's safety and efficacy.

Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was completed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they described transcirculation approaches in adult patients with IAs undergoing FD. Outcomes of interest included intraoperative complications and aneurysm occlusion rates.

Results: Twelve studies with 19 patients (N = 19, mean age = 54.1 y, 89.5% female) were identified. Wide-necked (N = 5, 26.3%) and saccular (N = 5, 26.3%) aneurysms were most represented, while 57.9% (N = 11) of aneurysms were unruptured and 15.8% (N = 3) of aneurysms were ruptured. The mean aneurysm sac and neck size were 16.9 mm and 11.9 mm, respectively. The most commonly deployed flow diverter was the Pipeline Embolization Device (N = 14, 73.9%). Successful FD (complete occlusion and/or good wall apposition) was recorded in 84.6% of qualifying patients with follow-up data, while 2 patients (15.4%) developed an intraoperative carotid-cavernous fistula.

Conclusion: Transcirculation approaches to FD offer neurointerventionalists a safe and efficacious method for device deployment, rescue scenarios, and challenging anatomy. Prospective studies may determine the most appropriate indications for transcirculation approaches to FD, while novel, lower profile devices may improve its technical feasibility and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信