细菌性脓毒症比病毒性(COVID-19)脓毒症在 Th1 通路中引起更剧烈的病理变化:一项对全血转录组的前瞻性观察研究。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Arisa Muratsu, Sayaka Oda, Shinya Onishi, Jumpei Yoshimura, Hisatake Matsumoto, Yuki Togami, Yumi Mitsuyama, Hiroshi Ito, Daisuke Okuzaki, Hiroshi Ogura, Jun Oda
{"title":"细菌性脓毒症比病毒性(COVID-19)脓毒症在 Th1 通路中引起更剧烈的病理变化:一项对全血转录组的前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Arisa Muratsu, Sayaka Oda, Shinya Onishi, Jumpei Yoshimura, Hisatake Matsumoto, Yuki Togami, Yumi Mitsuyama, Hiroshi Ito, Daisuke Okuzaki, Hiroshi Ogura, Jun Oda","doi":"10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to comprehensively compare host responses of patients with bacterial sepsis and those with viral (COVID-19) sepsis by analyzing messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) profiles to shed light on their distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Whole blood RNA sequencing was used to analyze mRNA and miRNA profiles of patients diagnosed as having bacterial sepsis or viral (COVID-19) sepsis at the Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Twenty-two bacterial sepsis patients, 35 viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, and 15 healthy subjects admitted to the department were included. We diagnosed bacterial sepsis patients according to the sepsis-3 criterion that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score must increase to 2 points or more among patients with suspected infections. Viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients were diagnosed using SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, and presence of pneumonia was assessed through chest computed tomography scans.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>For RNA sequencing, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 2556 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were available for analysis in the bacterial sepsis patients. Numbers of genes showing upregulated: downregulated gene expression (false discovery rate < 0.05, |log2 fold change| > 1.5) were 256:2887 for mRNA, 53:5 for miRNA, and 49:2507 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. Similarly, in viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 327 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were analyzed, with numbers of genes exhibiting upregulated: downregulated gene expression of 672:1147 for mRNA, 3:4 for miRNA, and 165:162 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. This analysis revealed significant differences in the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes expressed and pathways between the bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Bacterial sepsis patients showed activation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and concurrent suppression of Th1 signaling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study illuminated distinct molecular variances between bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis. Bacterial sepsis patients had a greater number of upregulated and downregulated genes and pathways compared to viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Especially, bacterial sepsis caused more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than did viral (COVID-19) sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23616,"journal":{"name":"Virology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial sepsis causes more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than does viral (COVID-19) sepsis: a prospective observational study of whole blood transcriptomes.\",\"authors\":\"Arisa Muratsu, Sayaka Oda, Shinya Onishi, Jumpei Yoshimura, Hisatake Matsumoto, Yuki Togami, Yumi Mitsuyama, Hiroshi Ito, Daisuke Okuzaki, Hiroshi Ogura, Jun Oda\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to comprehensively compare host responses of patients with bacterial sepsis and those with viral (COVID-19) sepsis by analyzing messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) profiles to shed light on their distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Whole blood RNA sequencing was used to analyze mRNA and miRNA profiles of patients diagnosed as having bacterial sepsis or viral (COVID-19) sepsis at the Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Twenty-two bacterial sepsis patients, 35 viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, and 15 healthy subjects admitted to the department were included. We diagnosed bacterial sepsis patients according to the sepsis-3 criterion that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score must increase to 2 points or more among patients with suspected infections. Viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients were diagnosed using SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, and presence of pneumonia was assessed through chest computed tomography scans.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>For RNA sequencing, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 2556 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were available for analysis in the bacterial sepsis patients. Numbers of genes showing upregulated: downregulated gene expression (false discovery rate < 0.05, |log2 fold change| > 1.5) were 256:2887 for mRNA, 53:5 for miRNA, and 49:2507 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. Similarly, in viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 327 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were analyzed, with numbers of genes exhibiting upregulated: downregulated gene expression of 672:1147 for mRNA, 3:4 for miRNA, and 165:162 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. This analysis revealed significant differences in the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes expressed and pathways between the bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Bacterial sepsis patients showed activation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and concurrent suppression of Th1 signaling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study illuminated distinct molecular variances between bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis. Bacterial sepsis patients had a greater number of upregulated and downregulated genes and pathways compared to viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Especially, bacterial sepsis caused more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than did viral (COVID-19) sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11334310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-024-02451-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在通过分析信使RNA(mRNA)和微RNA(miRNA)图谱,全面比较细菌性败血症患者和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者的宿主反应,以揭示两者不同的病理生理机制:前瞻性观察研究:大阪大学医学研究生院创伤与急诊医学系对被诊断为细菌性败血症或病毒性(COVID-19)败血症的患者进行全血RNA测序,分析其mRNA和miRNA谱:患者:包括 22 名细菌性败血症患者、35 名病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者和 15 名健康人。我们根据败血症-3 标准诊断细菌性败血症患者,该标准要求疑似感染患者的序贯器官衰竭评估得分必须增加到 2 分或以上。病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者通过SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测进行诊断,是否存在肺炎则通过胸部计算机断层扫描进行评估:测量和主要结果对细菌性败血症患者的 14500 个 mRNA、1121 个 miRNA 和 2556 个 miRNA 靶向 mRNA 进行了 RNA 测序分析。显示基因表达上调:下调的基因数(假发现率 1.5)分别为:mRNA 256:2887,miRNA 53:5,miRNA靶向 mRNA 49:2507。同样,在病毒性败血症(COVID-19)患者中,分析了 14500 个 mRNA、1121 个 miRNA 和 327 个 miRNA 靶向的 mRNA,发现上调:下调基因表达的数量分别为:mRNA:672:1147;miRNA:3:4;miRNA 靶向的 mRNA:165:162。这项分析表明,细菌性败血症和病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者表达的上调和下调基因数量及通路存在明显差异。细菌性败血症患者的PD-1和PD-L1癌症免疫治疗信号通路被激活,Th1信号通路同时被抑制:我们的研究揭示了细菌性败血症与病毒性(COVID-19)败血症之间截然不同的分子差异。与病毒性(COVID-19)败血症患者相比,细菌性败血症患者有更多的上调和下调基因和通路。尤其是,细菌性败血症比病毒性(COVID-19)败血症在 Th1 通路上引起的病理变化更为剧烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bacterial sepsis causes more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than does viral (COVID-19) sepsis: a prospective observational study of whole blood transcriptomes.

Objectives: This study aimed to comprehensively compare host responses of patients with bacterial sepsis and those with viral (COVID-19) sepsis by analyzing messenger RNA (mRNA) and microRNA (miRNA) profiles to shed light on their distinct pathophysiological mechanisms.

Design: Prospective observational study.

Setting: Whole blood RNA sequencing was used to analyze mRNA and miRNA profiles of patients diagnosed as having bacterial sepsis or viral (COVID-19) sepsis at the Department of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine.

Patients: Twenty-two bacterial sepsis patients, 35 viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, and 15 healthy subjects admitted to the department were included. We diagnosed bacterial sepsis patients according to the sepsis-3 criterion that the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score must increase to 2 points or more among patients with suspected infections. Viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients were diagnosed using SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, and presence of pneumonia was assessed through chest computed tomography scans.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: For RNA sequencing, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 2556 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were available for analysis in the bacterial sepsis patients. Numbers of genes showing upregulated: downregulated gene expression (false discovery rate < 0.05, |log2 fold change| > 1.5) were 256:2887 for mRNA, 53:5 for miRNA, and 49:2507 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. Similarly, in viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients, 14,500 mRNAs, 1121 miRNAs, and 327 miRNA-targeted mRNAs were analyzed, with numbers of genes exhibiting upregulated: downregulated gene expression of 672:1147 for mRNA, 3:4 for miRNA, and 165:162 for miRNA-targeted mRNA. This analysis revealed significant differences in the numbers of upregulated and downregulated genes expressed and pathways between the bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Bacterial sepsis patients showed activation of the PD-1 and PD-L1 cancer immunotherapy signaling pathway and concurrent suppression of Th1 signaling.

Conclusion: Our study illuminated distinct molecular variances between bacterial sepsis and viral (COVID-19) sepsis. Bacterial sepsis patients had a greater number of upregulated and downregulated genes and pathways compared to viral (COVID-19) sepsis patients. Especially, bacterial sepsis caused more dramatic pathogenetic changes in the Th1 pathway than did viral (COVID-19) sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Virology Journal
Virology Journal 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
186
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Virology Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of virology, including research on the viruses of animals, plants and microbes. The journal welcomes basic research as well as pre-clinical and clinical studies of novel diagnostic tools, vaccines and anti-viral therapies. The Editorial policy of Virology Journal is to publish all research which is assessed by peer reviewers to be a coherent and sound addition to the scientific literature, and puts less emphasis on interest levels or perceived impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信