新护士领导力量表土耳其版的心理测量特性:基于教练的领导力量表》。

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Pelin Calpbinici, Pınar Uzunkaya Öztoprak, Füsun Terzioğlu
{"title":"新护士领导力量表土耳其版的心理测量特性:基于教练的领导力量表》。","authors":"Pelin Calpbinici, Pınar Uzunkaya Öztoprak, Füsun Terzioğlu","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2024-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In the current literature, no existing scale that can measure nurse specific coaching-based leadership has been found. <b>Purpose:</b> The study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Coaching-Based Leadership Scale (CBLS). <b>Methods:</b> The research is methodological. The study was conducted in two sample groups for the employees' and leaders' versions of the scale. <b>Results:</b> The confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed that both the employees' and leaders' versions have a 16-item, four-factor structure, and the fit indices were confirmed as follows: for the employees' version: Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) = 361.948, χ<sup>2</sup>/degrees of freedom (<i>df</i>) = 4.022, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.133, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.808, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.941, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.821, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.0317, and for the leaders' version: χ<sup>2</sup> = 180.121, χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 1.896, RMSEA = 0.104, GFI = 0.809, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.962, and SRMR = 0.0177. The obtained fit indices indicated a good fit. The scale-item-total score correlations were found to range from <i>r</i> = 0.816 to <i>r</i> = 0.952 for the employees' version and from <i>r</i> = 0.922 to <i>r</i> = 0.968 for the leaders' version, which were determined to be at an acceptable level. It was determined that the Cronbach's alpha (α) reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.98 in the employees' version and the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. In the leaders' version, the Cronbach's α reliability coefficient was 0.99, while the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were found to be 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. <b>Conclusion:</b> It has been determined that the CBLS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish nursing employees and managers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Form of a New Scale for Nurse Leaders: Coaching-Based Leadership Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Pelin Calpbinici, Pınar Uzunkaya Öztoprak, Füsun Terzioğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JNM-2024-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In the current literature, no existing scale that can measure nurse specific coaching-based leadership has been found. <b>Purpose:</b> The study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Coaching-Based Leadership Scale (CBLS). <b>Methods:</b> The research is methodological. The study was conducted in two sample groups for the employees' and leaders' versions of the scale. <b>Results:</b> The confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed that both the employees' and leaders' versions have a 16-item, four-factor structure, and the fit indices were confirmed as follows: for the employees' version: Chi-square (χ<sup>2</sup>) = 361.948, χ<sup>2</sup>/degrees of freedom (<i>df</i>) = 4.022, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.133, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.808, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.941, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.821, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.0317, and for the leaders' version: χ<sup>2</sup> = 180.121, χ<sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 1.896, RMSEA = 0.104, GFI = 0.809, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.962, and SRMR = 0.0177. The obtained fit indices indicated a good fit. The scale-item-total score correlations were found to range from <i>r</i> = 0.816 to <i>r</i> = 0.952 for the employees' version and from <i>r</i> = 0.922 to <i>r</i> = 0.968 for the leaders' version, which were determined to be at an acceptable level. It was determined that the Cronbach's alpha (α) reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.98 in the employees' version and the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. In the leaders' version, the Cronbach's α reliability coefficient was 0.99, while the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were found to be 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. <b>Conclusion:</b> It has been determined that the CBLS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish nursing employees and managers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of nursing measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2024-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在目前的文献中,还没有发现可以测量护士教练式领导力的量表。目的:本研究旨在确定教练式领导力量表(CBLS)在土耳其的有效性和可靠性。研究方法:研究采用方法论。研究针对员工版和领导版量表的两个样本组进行。研究结果量表的确认性因素分析表明,员工版和领导者版的量表均具有 16 个项目的四因素结构,拟合指数如下:员工版的拟合指数为基方(χ2)= 361.948,χ2/自由度(df)= 4.022,均方根近似误差(RMSEA)= 0.133,拟合优度指数(GFI)= 0.808,比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.941,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)= 0.领导者版本:χ2 = 180.121,χ2/df = 1.896,RMSEA = 0.104,GFI = 0.809,CFI = 0.970,TLI = 0.962,SRR = 0.0177。所得拟合指数表明拟合效果良好。员工版本的量表-项目-总分相关系数为 r = 0.816 至 r = 0.952,领导版本的相关系数为 r = 0.922 至 r = 0.968,这两个相关系数被确定为处于可接受水平。经测定,员工版量表的 Cronbach's alpha(α)信度系数为 0.98,其子维度的 Cronbach's α 系数分别为:工作联盟 0.93、开放式沟通 0.96、学习与发展 0.97、进步与结果 0.96。领导者版本的 Cronbach's α 信度系数为 0.99,其子维度的 Cronbach's α 系数分别为:工作联盟 0.93、开放式沟通 0.96、学习与发展 0.97、进步与结果 0.96。结论CBLS对于土耳其护理人员和管理人员来说是一个有效且可靠的测量工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Form of a New Scale for Nurse Leaders: Coaching-Based Leadership Scale.

Background: In the current literature, no existing scale that can measure nurse specific coaching-based leadership has been found. Purpose: The study was conducted to determine the Turkish validity and reliability of the Coaching-Based Leadership Scale (CBLS). Methods: The research is methodological. The study was conducted in two sample groups for the employees' and leaders' versions of the scale. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis of the scale revealed that both the employees' and leaders' versions have a 16-item, four-factor structure, and the fit indices were confirmed as follows: for the employees' version: Chi-square (χ2) = 361.948, χ2/degrees of freedom (df) = 4.022, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.133, goodness of fit index (GFI) = 0.808, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.941, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.821, and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.0317, and for the leaders' version: χ2 = 180.121, χ2/df = 1.896, RMSEA = 0.104, GFI = 0.809, CFI = 0.970, TLI = 0.962, and SRMR = 0.0177. The obtained fit indices indicated a good fit. The scale-item-total score correlations were found to range from r = 0.816 to r = 0.952 for the employees' version and from r = 0.922 to r = 0.968 for the leaders' version, which were determined to be at an acceptable level. It was determined that the Cronbach's alpha (α) reliability coefficient of the scale was 0.98 in the employees' version and the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. In the leaders' version, the Cronbach's α reliability coefficient was 0.99, while the Cronbach's α coefficients of its subdimensions were found to be 0.93 for working alliance, 0.96 for open communication, 0.97 for learning and development, and 0.96 for progress and results. Conclusion: It has been determined that the CBLS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for Turkish nursing employees and managers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信