MICRA 无导线起搏器日间手术是否安全?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lin-Thiri Toon, Mohammed ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Roopa Patil, John Paisey, Arthur Yue, Paul Roberts
{"title":"MICRA 无导线起搏器日间手术是否安全?","authors":"Lin-Thiri Toon, Mohammed ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Roopa Patil, John Paisey, Arthur Yue, Paul Roberts","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MICRA implantation is not commonly done as a day-case procedure. Elective leadless pacemakers are implanted routinely in our centre.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the day-case MICRA procedure is safe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from all patients undergoing elective MICRA implantation at our centre between May 2014 and Nov 2022 (n = 81). Two patient groups were stratified: those planned to be discharged on the same day (SD, n = 52) and those planned to be observed overnight after the procedure (ON, n = 29). Patient demographics, size of the sheath used, type of MICRA device, and rate of complications were recorded. In patients with successful implants (n = 80), device function at discharge and first routine follow-up were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 58% males in the SD group and 45% in the ON group. Median age was 49 years in the SD and 67 years in the ON. Among patients who were planned as a day case, 8 patients had to stay in the hospital but for < 48 h: 2 due to minor groin bleeding, 1 due to patient's request despite fit to discharge, 4 due to the procedure carried out later in the day, and 1 for observation due to procedural complexity. MICRA implantation was successful in 80 patients. The rate of the major complications was 2% in the SD group and 7% in the ON group (p = 0.223), and none of the co-morbidities assessed showed an association with any complications. Device parameters at the follow-up were available in 76 patients. The rate of patients with low and stable PCT at follow-up was also 98% in the SD group and 96% in the ON group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Day case MICRA procedure can be performed safely in an appropriately selected patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?\",\"authors\":\"Lin-Thiri Toon, Mohammed ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Roopa Patil, John Paisey, Arthur Yue, Paul Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>MICRA implantation is not commonly done as a day-case procedure. Elective leadless pacemakers are implanted routinely in our centre.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the day-case MICRA procedure is safe.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data from all patients undergoing elective MICRA implantation at our centre between May 2014 and Nov 2022 (n = 81). Two patient groups were stratified: those planned to be discharged on the same day (SD, n = 52) and those planned to be observed overnight after the procedure (ON, n = 29). Patient demographics, size of the sheath used, type of MICRA device, and rate of complications were recorded. In patients with successful implants (n = 80), device function at discharge and first routine follow-up were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 58% males in the SD group and 45% in the ON group. Median age was 49 years in the SD and 67 years in the ON. Among patients who were planned as a day case, 8 patients had to stay in the hospital but for < 48 h: 2 due to minor groin bleeding, 1 due to patient's request despite fit to discharge, 4 due to the procedure carried out later in the day, and 1 for observation due to procedural complexity. MICRA implantation was successful in 80 patients. The rate of the major complications was 2% in the SD group and 7% in the ON group (p = 0.223), and none of the co-morbidities assessed showed an association with any complications. Device parameters at the follow-up were available in 76 patients. The rate of patients with low and stable PCT at follow-up was also 98% in the SD group and 96% in the ON group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Day case MICRA procedure can be performed safely in an appropriately selected patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01907-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:MICRA 植入术通常不作为日间手术进行。在我们中心,择期无导联心脏起搏器是常规植入手术:评估日间 MICRA 手术是否安全:我们回顾性地收集了 2014 年 5 月至 2022 年 11 月期间在本中心接受择期 MICRA 植入术的所有患者的数据(n = 81)。我们对两组患者进行了分层:计划当天出院的患者(SD,n = 52)和计划术后过夜观察的患者(ON,n = 29)。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、所用鞘的大小、MICRA 装置的类型和并发症发生率。在成功植入的患者中(n = 80),对出院时的装置功能和首次常规随访进行了评估:结果:SD组中男性占58%,ON组中男性占45%。SD组的中位年龄为49岁,ON组为67岁。在计划进行日间手术的患者中,有 8 名患者需要留院观察并得出结论:经过适当选择的患者可以安全地进行日间 MICRA 手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?

Is day-case surgical procedure safe for MICRA leadless pacemaker implantation?

Background: MICRA implantation is not commonly done as a day-case procedure. Elective leadless pacemakers are implanted routinely in our centre.

Objective: To assess whether the day-case MICRA procedure is safe.

Methods: We retrospectively collected data from all patients undergoing elective MICRA implantation at our centre between May 2014 and Nov 2022 (n = 81). Two patient groups were stratified: those planned to be discharged on the same day (SD, n = 52) and those planned to be observed overnight after the procedure (ON, n = 29). Patient demographics, size of the sheath used, type of MICRA device, and rate of complications were recorded. In patients with successful implants (n = 80), device function at discharge and first routine follow-up were evaluated.

Results: There were 58% males in the SD group and 45% in the ON group. Median age was 49 years in the SD and 67 years in the ON. Among patients who were planned as a day case, 8 patients had to stay in the hospital but for < 48 h: 2 due to minor groin bleeding, 1 due to patient's request despite fit to discharge, 4 due to the procedure carried out later in the day, and 1 for observation due to procedural complexity. MICRA implantation was successful in 80 patients. The rate of the major complications was 2% in the SD group and 7% in the ON group (p = 0.223), and none of the co-morbidities assessed showed an association with any complications. Device parameters at the follow-up were available in 76 patients. The rate of patients with low and stable PCT at follow-up was also 98% in the SD group and 96% in the ON group.

Conclusions: Day case MICRA procedure can be performed safely in an appropriately selected patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信