评估工作场所多层次心理健康干预中的社会心理工作因素:MENTUPP 试点研究的结果。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Fotini Tsantila, Reiner Rugulies, Evelien Coppens, Hans De Witte, Ella Arensman, Abdulla Kahar, Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja, Paul Corcoran, Lars De Winter, Birgit Greiner, Eve Griffin, Bridget Hogg, Caleb Leduc, Mallorie Leduc, Margaret Maxwell, Hanna Reich, Victoria Ross, Chantal Van Audenhove, Birgit Aust
{"title":"评估工作场所多层次心理健康干预中的社会心理工作因素:MENTUPP 试点研究的结果。","authors":"Fotini Tsantila, Reiner Rugulies, Evelien Coppens, Hans De Witte, Ella Arensman, Abdulla Kahar, Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja, Paul Corcoran, Lars De Winter, Birgit Greiner, Eve Griffin, Bridget Hogg, Caleb Leduc, Mallorie Leduc, Margaret Maxwell, Hanna Reich, Victoria Ross, Chantal Van Audenhove, Birgit Aust","doi":"10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":13761,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.\",\"authors\":\"Fotini Tsantila, Reiner Rugulies, Evelien Coppens, Hans De Witte, Ella Arensman, Abdulla Kahar, Arlinda Cerga-Pashoja, Paul Corcoran, Lars De Winter, Birgit Greiner, Eve Griffin, Bridget Hogg, Caleb Leduc, Mallorie Leduc, Margaret Maxwell, Hanna Reich, Victoria Ross, Chantal Van Audenhove, Birgit Aust\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485064/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-024-02096-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:工作场所的心理健康问题日益受到企业和政策制定者的关注。MENTUPP是一项多层次的心理健康干预措施,在九个国家的三个工作领域的中小型企业中实施。这项试点研究旨在评估 MENTUPP 干预措施的可行性、实施方式和工具,为分组随机对照试验的规划提供参考:我们采用了哥本哈根社会心理问卷和丹麦工作环境队列研究中的项目来测量工作场所的社会心理因素。382 名参与者在基线时回答了问卷,其中 98 名参与者在 6 个月后的随访中也回答了问卷。我们计算了基线时 19 项社会心理因素的平均得分,并进行了重复测量方差分析,以评估随访时 8 项社会心理因素的差异。我们还研究了随访时不同工作部门和工作岗位的结果是否存在差异:结果:建筑行业和没有领导职务或领导职务较低的工人在基线时报告了更多的负面工作环境因素。我们观察到,来自同事的社会支持和工作中的社会团体在统计意义上有显著下降,工作中的公正性也略有下降。在其他因素方面,我们没有观察到统计学意义上的显著变化:结论:我们发现社会心理工作环境因素在基线工作部门和工作岗位之间存在明显差异。与我们的假设相反,有三个社会心理工作环境因素在随访时有所下降。可能的解释是:利用特定的社会心理因素作为应对社会心理压力的资源;参与者的期望值过高,而干预措施未能满足;没有足够的时间进行结构性改变;或干预措施引发了对工作环境的批判性评估。这些发现将为即将开展的分组随机对照试验的设计和实施提供参考,同时还将对这些发现进行进一步调查,以验证其重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.

Background: Mental health in the workplace is a growing concern for enterprises and policy makers. MENTUPP is a multi-level mental health intervention implemented in small and medium size enterprises from three work sectors in nine countries. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, delivery, and instruments for the MENTUPP intervention to inform the planning of a clustered randomized controlled trial.

Methods: We administered items from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study measuring psychosocial workplace factors. The questionnaire was answered by 382 participants at baseline, of which 98 participants also answered after six months at follow-up. We calculated mean scores of 19 psychosocial factors at baseline and conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to assess differences in eight psychosocial factors at follow-up. We also examined whether outcomes differed between work sectors and job positions at follow-up.

Results: The construction sector and workers with no or a lower leadership role reported more negative working environment factors at baseline. We observed a statistically significant decline in social support from colleagues and social community at work, and a marginally significant decline in justice at work. For the rest of the constructs, we did not observe statistically significant changes.

Conclusions: We found significant differences in psychosocial work environment factors among work sectors and job positions at baseline. Contrary to our hypotheses, three psychosocial work environment factors decreased at follow-up. Possible explanations are the utilization of specific psychosocial factors as resources to cope with psychosocial stressors, high participant expectations that were not met by the intervention, insufficient time for structural changes, or the intervention prompting critical evaluations of the work environment. These findings will inform the design and implementation of the forthcoming clustered randomized controlled trial, where they will also be further investigated to validate their significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health publishes Editorials, Review Articles, Original Articles, and Letters to the Editor. It welcomes any manuscripts dealing with occupational or ambient environmental problems, with a special interest in research at the interface of occupational health and clinical medicine. The scope ranges from Biological Monitoring to Dermatology, from Fibers and Dust to Human Toxicology, from Nanomaterials and Ultra-fine Dust to Night- and Shift Work, from Psycho-mental Distress and Burnout to Vibrations. A complete list of topics can be found on the right-hand side under For authors and editors. In addition, all papers should be based on present-day standards and relate to: -Clinical and epidemiological studies on morbidity and mortality -Clinical epidemiological studies on the parameters relevant to the estimation of health risks -Human experimental studies on environmental health effects. Animal experiments are only acceptable if relevant to pathogenic aspects. -Methods for studying the topics mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信