轻度葡萄糖不耐受孕妇的代谢因素和围产期结果。

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
{"title":"轻度葡萄糖不耐受孕妇的代谢因素和围产期结果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Metabolic characteristics and outcomes were compared among pregnant individuals with varying levels of glucose intolerance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>827 participants from a randomized clinical trial comparing the IADPSG and Carpenter Coustan Criteria were grouped as follows: normal glucose tolerance, mild glucose intolerance (100 g OGTT with one abnormal value) and treated GDM (diagnosed by Carpenter Coustan or IADPSG criteria). Differences in metabolic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mild glucose intolerance had lower insulin sensitivity and beta cell response than normal glucose tolerance, and similar findings to treated GDM. Small for gestational age (SGA) (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08–0.24) and neonatal composite morbidity were lower (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38–0.74), and maternal composite morbidity higher (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.57–2.62) when comparing mild intolerance to normal glucose tolerance. Large for gestational age (OR 3.42 95% CI 1.39–8.41) was higher while SGA (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05–0.81) and neonatal composite morbidity (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17–0.57) were lower with mild glucose intolerance compared to treated GDM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mild glucose intolerance has a similar metabolic profile to treated GDM, and outcome differences are likely related to knowledge of diagnosis and treatment.</p><p>Clinical trials registry: NCT02309138.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic factors and perinatal outcomes among pregnant individuals with mild glucose intolerance\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>Metabolic characteristics and outcomes were compared among pregnant individuals with varying levels of glucose intolerance.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>827 participants from a randomized clinical trial comparing the IADPSG and Carpenter Coustan Criteria were grouped as follows: normal glucose tolerance, mild glucose intolerance (100 g OGTT with one abnormal value) and treated GDM (diagnosed by Carpenter Coustan or IADPSG criteria). Differences in metabolic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mild glucose intolerance had lower insulin sensitivity and beta cell response than normal glucose tolerance, and similar findings to treated GDM. Small for gestational age (SGA) (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08–0.24) and neonatal composite morbidity were lower (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38–0.74), and maternal composite morbidity higher (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.57–2.62) when comparing mild intolerance to normal glucose tolerance. Large for gestational age (OR 3.42 95% CI 1.39–8.41) was higher while SGA (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05–0.81) and neonatal composite morbidity (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17–0.57) were lower with mild glucose intolerance compared to treated GDM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Mild glucose intolerance has a similar metabolic profile to treated GDM, and outcome differences are likely related to knowledge of diagnosis and treatment.</p><p>Clinical trials registry: NCT02309138.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes research and clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016882272400740X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016882272400740X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较不同程度葡萄糖不耐受孕妇的代谢特征和预后。方法:将一项比较 IADPSG 标准和 Carpenter Coustan 标准的随机临床试验中的 827 名参与者分组如下:正常葡萄糖耐受、轻度葡萄糖不耐受(100 克 OGTT 有一个异常值)和经治疗的 GDM(根据 Carpenter Coustan 或 IADPSG 标准诊断)。采用治疗的反概率加权法评估了代谢特征和围产期结果的差异:结果:与正常糖耐量相比,轻度糖耐量患者的胰岛素敏感性和β细胞反应较低,其结果与经治疗的GDM相似。与正常糖耐量相比,轻度葡萄糖不耐受导致的胎龄小(SGA)(OR 0.13,95% CI 0.08-0.24)和新生儿综合发病率较低(OR 0.53,95% CI 0.38-0.74),而孕产妇综合发病率较高(OR 2.03,95% CI 1.57-2.62)。与经过治疗的 GDM 相比,轻度葡萄糖不耐受导致的胎龄大(OR 3.42 95% CI 1.39-8.41)更高,而 SGA(OR 0.21,95% CI 0.05-0.81)和新生儿综合发病率(OR 0.31,95% CI 0.17-0.57)更低:结论:轻度葡萄糖不耐受与经治疗的GDM具有相似的代谢特征,结果差异可能与诊断和治疗知识有关:临床试验登记:NCT02309138。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metabolic factors and perinatal outcomes among pregnant individuals with mild glucose intolerance

Aims

Metabolic characteristics and outcomes were compared among pregnant individuals with varying levels of glucose intolerance.

Methods

827 participants from a randomized clinical trial comparing the IADPSG and Carpenter Coustan Criteria were grouped as follows: normal glucose tolerance, mild glucose intolerance (100 g OGTT with one abnormal value) and treated GDM (diagnosed by Carpenter Coustan or IADPSG criteria). Differences in metabolic characteristics and perinatal outcomes were assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Results

Mild glucose intolerance had lower insulin sensitivity and beta cell response than normal glucose tolerance, and similar findings to treated GDM. Small for gestational age (SGA) (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08–0.24) and neonatal composite morbidity were lower (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38–0.74), and maternal composite morbidity higher (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.57–2.62) when comparing mild intolerance to normal glucose tolerance. Large for gestational age (OR 3.42 95% CI 1.39–8.41) was higher while SGA (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05–0.81) and neonatal composite morbidity (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.17–0.57) were lower with mild glucose intolerance compared to treated GDM.

Conclusions

Mild glucose intolerance has a similar metabolic profile to treated GDM, and outcome differences are likely related to knowledge of diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical trials registry: NCT02309138.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信