甜饮料与糖尿病前期或糖尿病患者的心房颤动。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xiaoqin Gan MD, Ziliang Ye MD, Yuanyuan Zhang MD, Panpan He MD, Mengyi Liu MD, Chun Zhou MD, Yanjun Zhang MD, Sisi Yang MD, Yu Huang MD, Hao Xiang MD, Xianhui Qin MD
{"title":"甜饮料与糖尿病前期或糖尿病患者的心房颤动。","authors":"Xiaoqin Gan MD,&nbsp;Ziliang Ye MD,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang MD,&nbsp;Panpan He MD,&nbsp;Mengyi Liu MD,&nbsp;Chun Zhou MD,&nbsp;Yanjun Zhang MD,&nbsp;Sisi Yang MD,&nbsp;Yu Huang MD,&nbsp;Hao Xiang MD,&nbsp;Xianhui Qin MD","doi":"10.1111/dom.15859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the association of intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and natural juices (NJs) with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with prediabetes or diabetes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 31 433 participants with prediabetes and diabetes from the UK Biobank were included. Information on the intake of SSBs, ASBs and NJs was accessed by 24-hour dietary recalls from 2009 to 2012. The study outcome was new-onset AF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 2470 (7.9%) AF cases were documented. Both the intake of SSBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18) and ASBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Accordingly, compared with non-consumers, participants who consumed more than one unit per day of SSBs (adjusted HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) or ASBs (adjusted HR = 1.21; 95% CI:1.05-1.40) had an increased risk of AF. Substituting 1 unit/day of NJs for SSBs was associated with a 9% (adjusted HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) lower risk of new-onset AF, while replacing SSBs with ASBs was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both the intake of SSBs and ASBs were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake did not show a significant association with AF in people with prediabetes or diabetes. Replacing an equivalent amount of SSB intake with NJs, but not ASBs, was associated with a lower risk of AF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sweetened beverages and atrial fibrillation in people with prediabetes or diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqin Gan MD,&nbsp;Ziliang Ye MD,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang MD,&nbsp;Panpan He MD,&nbsp;Mengyi Liu MD,&nbsp;Chun Zhou MD,&nbsp;Yanjun Zhang MD,&nbsp;Sisi Yang MD,&nbsp;Yu Huang MD,&nbsp;Hao Xiang MD,&nbsp;Xianhui Qin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.15859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the association of intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and natural juices (NJs) with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with prediabetes or diabetes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 31 433 participants with prediabetes and diabetes from the UK Biobank were included. Information on the intake of SSBs, ASBs and NJs was accessed by 24-hour dietary recalls from 2009 to 2012. The study outcome was new-onset AF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 2470 (7.9%) AF cases were documented. Both the intake of SSBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18) and ASBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Accordingly, compared with non-consumers, participants who consumed more than one unit per day of SSBs (adjusted HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) or ASBs (adjusted HR = 1.21; 95% CI:1.05-1.40) had an increased risk of AF. Substituting 1 unit/day of NJs for SSBs was associated with a 9% (adjusted HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) lower risk of new-onset AF, while replacing SSBs with ASBs was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both the intake of SSBs and ASBs were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake did not show a significant association with AF in people with prediabetes or diabetes. Replacing an equivalent amount of SSB intake with NJs, but not ASBs, was associated with a lower risk of AF.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.15859\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.15859","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估糖尿病前期或糖尿病患者摄入含糖饮料(SSB)、人工甜饮料(ASB)和天然果汁(NJ)与新发心房颤动(AF)的关系:方法:共纳入英国生物库中 31 433 名糖尿病前期和糖尿病患者。2009年至2012年期间,通过24小时膳食回忆获取了有关固态饮料、非固态饮料和无酒精饮料摄入量的信息。研究结果为新发房颤:中位随访时间为 12.0 年,共记录了 2470 例(7.9%)房颤病例。固体饮料的摄入量(每增加 1 单位/天;调整后的危险比 [HR] = 1.11;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.04-1.18)和固体饮料的摄入量(每增加 1 单位/天;调整后的危险比 [HR] = 1.11;95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.04-1.18)均显著增加:1.04-1.18)和ASB(每1单位/天递增;调整后危险比[HR]=1.08;95% 置信区间[CI]:1.02-1.14)与新发房颤呈线性正相关,而NJ摄入量与新发房颤无明显关系(每1单位/天递增;调整后危险比[HR]=1.00;95% 置信区间[CI]:0.93-1.08)。因此,与不摄入者相比,每天摄入 1 单位以上 SSBs(调整后 HR = 1.30;95% CI:1.11-1.53)或 ASBs(调整后 HR = 1.21;95% CI:1.05-1.40)的参与者罹患房颤的风险增加。用 1 单位/天的 NJ 代替 SSB 可使新发房颤的风险降低 9%(调整后 HR = 0.91;95% CI:0.83-0.99),而用 ASB 代替 SSB 与新发房颤的关系不大(调整后 HR = 0.97;95% CI:0.89-1.06):结论:在糖尿病前期或糖尿病患者中,固态苏打和非固态苏打的摄入量与新发房颤呈线性正相关,而 NJ 的摄入量与房颤无明显关系。用 NJ(而非 ASB)替代等量的 SSB 摄入量可降低心房颤动的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sweetened beverages and atrial fibrillation in people with prediabetes or diabetes

Aim

To assess the association of intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and natural juices (NJs) with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in people with prediabetes or diabetes.

Methods

A total of 31 433 participants with prediabetes and diabetes from the UK Biobank were included. Information on the intake of SSBs, ASBs and NJs was accessed by 24-hour dietary recalls from 2009 to 2012. The study outcome was new-onset AF.

Results

During a median follow-up of 12.0 years, 2470 (7.9%) AF cases were documented. Both the intake of SSBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.18) and ASBs (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02-1.14) were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (per 1 unit/day increment; adjusted HR = 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93-1.08). Accordingly, compared with non-consumers, participants who consumed more than one unit per day of SSBs (adjusted HR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) or ASBs (adjusted HR = 1.21; 95% CI:1.05-1.40) had an increased risk of AF. Substituting 1 unit/day of NJs for SSBs was associated with a 9% (adjusted HR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.83-0.99) lower risk of new-onset AF, while replacing SSBs with ASBs was not significantly associated with new-onset AF (adjusted HR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.89-1.06).

Conclusions

Both the intake of SSBs and ASBs were linearly and positively associated with new-onset AF, while NJ intake did not show a significant association with AF in people with prediabetes or diabetes. Replacing an equivalent amount of SSB intake with NJs, but not ASBs, was associated with a lower risk of AF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信