德国的工业二氧化碳运输:管道线路方案比较

IF 4.6 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Christopher Yeates , Ali Abdelshafy , Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger , Grit Walther
{"title":"德国的工业二氧化碳运输:管道线路方案比较","authors":"Christopher Yeates ,&nbsp;Ali Abdelshafy ,&nbsp;Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger ,&nbsp;Grit Walther","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Carbon capture and storage will be necessary for some industries to reach carbon neutrality. One of the main associated challenges is the design of the network linking the CO<sub>2</sub> sources to the storage sites. Establishing a CO<sub>2</sub> network can be impacted by many uncertainties such as CO<sub>2</sub> amounts, pipeline routes and the locations of emitters and carbon sinks. We present a framework to investigate different scenarios of a future CO<sub>2</sub> network in Germany. The analyses compare the routes and associated costs of different scenarios. The developed model uses several geospatial datasets and an optimization scheme to yield realistic and cost-efficient outcomes. Parameters such as population density and existing infrastructure are integrated to calculate potential routes, which are then used as an input for the developed heuristic model to determine the optimum network. The derived framework is flexible and can be used for investigating other scenarios, regions and settings. The results show that the different scenarios have a profound impact on the optimal layout and costs. The investment costs of the investigated scenarios range between 1.3 and 3 billion EUR. The outcomes are important for academia, industry and policymaking for the ongoing discussions regarding the development of carbon infrastructure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 104225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001683/pdfft?md5=05564634db40e228e721683a25042bea&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001683-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Yeates ,&nbsp;Ali Abdelshafy ,&nbsp;Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger ,&nbsp;Grit Walther\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Carbon capture and storage will be necessary for some industries to reach carbon neutrality. One of the main associated challenges is the design of the network linking the CO<sub>2</sub> sources to the storage sites. Establishing a CO<sub>2</sub> network can be impacted by many uncertainties such as CO<sub>2</sub> amounts, pipeline routes and the locations of emitters and carbon sinks. We present a framework to investigate different scenarios of a future CO<sub>2</sub> network in Germany. The analyses compare the routes and associated costs of different scenarios. The developed model uses several geospatial datasets and an optimization scheme to yield realistic and cost-efficient outcomes. Parameters such as population density and existing infrastructure are integrated to calculate potential routes, which are then used as an input for the developed heuristic model to determine the optimum network. The derived framework is flexible and can be used for investigating other scenarios, regions and settings. The results show that the different scenarios have a profound impact on the optimal layout and costs. The investment costs of the investigated scenarios range between 1.3 and 3 billion EUR. The outcomes are important for academia, industry and policymaking for the ongoing discussions regarding the development of carbon infrastructure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001683/pdfft?md5=05564634db40e228e721683a25042bea&pid=1-s2.0-S1750583624001683-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583624001683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳捕集与封存是某些行业实现碳中和的必要条件。相关的主要挑战之一是设计连接二氧化碳源和封存地点的网络。建立二氧化碳网络会受到许多不确定因素的影响,如二氧化碳的数量、管道路线以及排放者和碳汇的位置。我们提出了一个研究德国未来二氧化碳网络不同方案的框架。分析比较了不同方案的路线和相关成本。所开发的模型使用了多个地理空间数据集和一个优化方案,以得出现实且具有成本效益的结果。通过整合人口密度和现有基础设施等参数来计算潜在路线,然后将其作为已开发启发式模型的输入,以确定最佳网络。衍生框架非常灵活,可用于研究其他方案、地区和环境。结果表明,不同的方案对最佳布局和成本有着深远的影响。调查方案的投资成本在 13 亿至 30 亿欧元之间。这些结果对于学术界、工业界和决策层正在进行的有关碳基础设施发展的讨论都非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios

Carbon capture and storage will be necessary for some industries to reach carbon neutrality. One of the main associated challenges is the design of the network linking the CO2 sources to the storage sites. Establishing a CO2 network can be impacted by many uncertainties such as CO2 amounts, pipeline routes and the locations of emitters and carbon sinks. We present a framework to investigate different scenarios of a future CO2 network in Germany. The analyses compare the routes and associated costs of different scenarios. The developed model uses several geospatial datasets and an optimization scheme to yield realistic and cost-efficient outcomes. Parameters such as population density and existing infrastructure are integrated to calculate potential routes, which are then used as an input for the developed heuristic model to determine the optimum network. The derived framework is flexible and can be used for investigating other scenarios, regions and settings. The results show that the different scenarios have a profound impact on the optimal layout and costs. The investment costs of the investigated scenarios range between 1.3 and 3 billion EUR. The outcomes are important for academia, industry and policymaking for the ongoing discussions regarding the development of carbon infrastructure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信