美国由护士主导的成人预先护理规划--范围界定综述。

IF 1.4
Kofi Gyasi Agyei, Ahmed-Rufai Yahaya, Emmanuel Dapilah, Sally A Norton
{"title":"美国由护士主导的成人预先护理规划--范围界定综述。","authors":"Kofi Gyasi Agyei, Ahmed-Rufai Yahaya, Emmanuel Dapilah, Sally A Norton","doi":"10.1177/10499091241276009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAdvance care planning involves discussing individuals' future medical treatment and care preferences. Nurses, due to their close relationships with patients and families, may be well-positioned to lead these discussions. Exploring the components and characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions is essential for enhancing their implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability.ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions in adult patients, identify the populations and settings where these interventions have been utilized, and the outcomes of these interventions in the U.S.MethodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. Using keywords related to nurse-led ACP interventions, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases.ResultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in varied settings. Registered nurses, oncology nurse navigators, and other specialized nurses primarily delivered nurse-led ACP interventions. The interventions ranged from one to two sessions and utilized various models and resources such as the Five Wishes and Respecting Choices.ConclusionsNurse-led ACP interventions have shown significant positive outcomes, including increased engagement in ACP, improved attitudes towards ADs, higher completion rates of ADs, and enhanced patient-surrogate congruence. These interventions are well-received by patients and can be implemented in diverse settings. However, a general guideline regarding nurse-led ACP interventions is needed to address the specific duration, sessions, and mode of delivery required for their optimal effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"801-813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse-Led Advance Care Planning in Adults in the U.S.- A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kofi Gyasi Agyei, Ahmed-Rufai Yahaya, Emmanuel Dapilah, Sally A Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091241276009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAdvance care planning involves discussing individuals' future medical treatment and care preferences. Nurses, due to their close relationships with patients and families, may be well-positioned to lead these discussions. Exploring the components and characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions is essential for enhancing their implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability.ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions in adult patients, identify the populations and settings where these interventions have been utilized, and the outcomes of these interventions in the U.S.MethodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. Using keywords related to nurse-led ACP interventions, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases.ResultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in varied settings. Registered nurses, oncology nurse navigators, and other specialized nurses primarily delivered nurse-led ACP interventions. The interventions ranged from one to two sessions and utilized various models and resources such as the Five Wishes and Respecting Choices.ConclusionsNurse-led ACP interventions have shown significant positive outcomes, including increased engagement in ACP, improved attitudes towards ADs, higher completion rates of ADs, and enhanced patient-surrogate congruence. These interventions are well-received by patients and can be implemented in diverse settings. However, a general guideline regarding nurse-led ACP interventions is needed to address the specific duration, sessions, and mode of delivery required for their optimal effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"801-813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American journal of hospice & palliative care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241276009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241276009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预先护理计划包括讨论个人未来的医疗和护理偏好。由于护士与患者及家属关系密切,他们可能处于领导这些讨论的有利位置。探索由护士主导的 ACP 干预措施的组成部分和特点对于加强其实施、有效性和可持续性至关重要:本范围界定综述旨在探讨以护士为主导的成人患者 ACP 干预措施的特点,确定使用这些干预措施的人群和环境,以及这些干预措施在美国的结果:按照 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的五阶段框架进行了范围界定审查。使用与护士主导的 ACP 干预相关的关键词,在 PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、EMBASE 和 PsycINFO 数据库中进行了全面检索:结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究在不同的环境中进行。主要由注册护士、肿瘤科护士导航员和其他专业护士提供由护士主导的 ACP 干预。这些干预措施从一个疗程到两个疗程不等,采用了各种模式和资源,如 "五个愿望 "和 "尊重选择":护士主导的 ACP 干预已显示出显著的积极成果,包括提高 ACP 的参与度、改善对 ADs 的态度、提高 ADs 的完成率以及增强患者与代理的一致性。这些干预措施深受患者欢迎,可在不同环境中实施。然而,我们需要制定一份关于护士主导的 ACP 干预的通用指南,以确定其最佳效果所需的具体持续时间、疗程和实施方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse-Led Advance Care Planning in Adults in the U.S.- A Scoping Review.

BackgroundAdvance care planning involves discussing individuals' future medical treatment and care preferences. Nurses, due to their close relationships with patients and families, may be well-positioned to lead these discussions. Exploring the components and characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions is essential for enhancing their implementation, effectiveness, and sustainability.ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to explore the characteristics of nurse-led ACP interventions in adult patients, identify the populations and settings where these interventions have been utilized, and the outcomes of these interventions in the U.S.MethodsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework. Using keywords related to nurse-led ACP interventions, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases.ResultsTwelve studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted in varied settings. Registered nurses, oncology nurse navigators, and other specialized nurses primarily delivered nurse-led ACP interventions. The interventions ranged from one to two sessions and utilized various models and resources such as the Five Wishes and Respecting Choices.ConclusionsNurse-led ACP interventions have shown significant positive outcomes, including increased engagement in ACP, improved attitudes towards ADs, higher completion rates of ADs, and enhanced patient-surrogate congruence. These interventions are well-received by patients and can be implemented in diverse settings. However, a general guideline regarding nurse-led ACP interventions is needed to address the specific duration, sessions, and mode of delivery required for their optimal effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信