清洁时间与动作:关于有效清洁医院共用医疗设备所需时间的观察研究。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
G. Matterson , K. Browne , P.E. Tehan , P.L. Russo , M. Kiernan , B.G. Mitchell
{"title":"清洁时间与动作:关于有效清洁医院共用医疗设备所需时间的观察研究。","authors":"G. Matterson ,&nbsp;K. Browne ,&nbsp;P.E. Tehan ,&nbsp;P.L. Russo ,&nbsp;M. Kiernan ,&nbsp;B.G. Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the important role that cleaning plays in reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections, no research has been undertaken to quantify the time required for effective cleaning and disinfection of different pieces of shared medical equipment commonly used in hospitals. This short report presents the results from a study that aimed to quantify the time required to clean common pieces of shared medical equipment effectively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational time and motion study was conducted in a nursing simulation laboratory to determine the time required for effective cleaning and disinfection of 12 pieces of shared medical equipment commonly used in hospital. After training, the participants cleaned and disinfected equipment, with the time taken to clean recorded. Cleaning was deemed to be effective if ≥80% of ultraviolet fluorescent dots were removed during the cleaning process.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The time to clean equipment effectively ranged from 50 s [blood glucose testing kit; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0:40–1:00 (min:s)] to 3 min 53 s [medication trolley; 95% CI 3:36–4:11 (min:s)]. The intravenous stand was cleaned most effectively, with 100% of dots removed (<em>N</em> = 100 dots). In contrast, the bladder scanner was the most difficult to clean, with 12 attempts required to meet the 80% threshold for effective cleaning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study will inform staffing and training requirements to plan the cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment effectively. The findings can also be used for business cases, and in future cost-effectiveness evaluations of cleaning interventions that include shared medical equipment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"152 ","pages":"Pages 138-141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002688/pdfft?md5=4c1d60b5346c9e59c03c0104a8295c6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0195670124002688-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cleaning time and motion: an observational study on the time required to clean shared medical equipment in hospitals effectively\",\"authors\":\"G. Matterson ,&nbsp;K. Browne ,&nbsp;P.E. Tehan ,&nbsp;P.L. Russo ,&nbsp;M. Kiernan ,&nbsp;B.G. Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite the important role that cleaning plays in reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections, no research has been undertaken to quantify the time required for effective cleaning and disinfection of different pieces of shared medical equipment commonly used in hospitals. This short report presents the results from a study that aimed to quantify the time required to clean common pieces of shared medical equipment effectively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An observational time and motion study was conducted in a nursing simulation laboratory to determine the time required for effective cleaning and disinfection of 12 pieces of shared medical equipment commonly used in hospital. After training, the participants cleaned and disinfected equipment, with the time taken to clean recorded. Cleaning was deemed to be effective if ≥80% of ultraviolet fluorescent dots were removed during the cleaning process.</p></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><p>The time to clean equipment effectively ranged from 50 s [blood glucose testing kit; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0:40–1:00 (min:s)] to 3 min 53 s [medication trolley; 95% CI 3:36–4:11 (min:s)]. The intravenous stand was cleaned most effectively, with 100% of dots removed (<em>N</em> = 100 dots). In contrast, the bladder scanner was the most difficult to clean, with 12 attempts required to meet the 80% threshold for effective cleaning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study will inform staffing and training requirements to plan the cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment effectively. The findings can also be used for business cases, and in future cost-effectiveness evaluations of cleaning interventions that include shared medical equipment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 138-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002688/pdfft?md5=4c1d60b5346c9e59c03c0104a8295c6a&pid=1-s2.0-S0195670124002688-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002688\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670124002688","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管清洁在降低医疗相关感染风险方面发挥着重要作用,但目前还没有研究对医院常用的各种共用医疗设备进行有效清洁和消毒所需的时间进行量化。在这份简短的报告中,我们介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在量化有效清洁常用共用医疗设备所需的时间:我们在护理模拟实验室进行了一项时间和动作观察研究,以确定有效清洁和消毒 12 件医院常用共用医疗设备所需的时间。在接受培训后,参与者对设备进行清洁和消毒,并记录清洁所需的时间。在清洁过程中,如果紫外线荧光点的去除率≥80%,则可判定清洁效果:主要结果:有效清洁设备的时间从 50 秒(血糖检测试剂盒;95%CI 0:40-1:00(分:秒))到 3 分 53 秒(药车;95%CI 3:36-4:11(分:秒))不等。静脉注射台的清洁效果最好,100% 的点都被清除了(n = 100 个点)。相反,膀胱扫描仪最难清洁,需要尝试 12 次才能达到 80% 的清洁标准:这项研究将为有效规划共用医疗设备的清洁和消毒提供人员配置和培训要求方面的信息。研究结果还可用于商业案例,以及未来对包括共用医疗设备在内的清洁干预措施进行成本效益评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cleaning time and motion: an observational study on the time required to clean shared medical equipment in hospitals effectively

Background

Despite the important role that cleaning plays in reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections, no research has been undertaken to quantify the time required for effective cleaning and disinfection of different pieces of shared medical equipment commonly used in hospitals. This short report presents the results from a study that aimed to quantify the time required to clean common pieces of shared medical equipment effectively.

Methods

An observational time and motion study was conducted in a nursing simulation laboratory to determine the time required for effective cleaning and disinfection of 12 pieces of shared medical equipment commonly used in hospital. After training, the participants cleaned and disinfected equipment, with the time taken to clean recorded. Cleaning was deemed to be effective if ≥80% of ultraviolet fluorescent dots were removed during the cleaning process.

Main results

The time to clean equipment effectively ranged from 50 s [blood glucose testing kit; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0:40–1:00 (min:s)] to 3 min 53 s [medication trolley; 95% CI 3:36–4:11 (min:s)]. The intravenous stand was cleaned most effectively, with 100% of dots removed (N = 100 dots). In contrast, the bladder scanner was the most difficult to clean, with 12 attempts required to meet the 80% threshold for effective cleaning.

Conclusion

This study will inform staffing and training requirements to plan the cleaning and disinfection of shared medical equipment effectively. The findings can also be used for business cases, and in future cost-effectiveness evaluations of cleaning interventions that include shared medical equipment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hospital Infection
Journal of Hospital Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
271
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience. The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that: provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings; provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination; provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises; describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection; throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship; describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control; improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change; improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信