利用两个常模获得的个性化功能连接组异常揭示了强迫症的神经生理学亚型。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Liang Liu , Dongyao Jia , Zihao He , Baohong Wen , Xiaopan Zhang , Shaoqiang Han
{"title":"利用两个常模获得的个性化功能连接组异常揭示了强迫症的神经生理学亚型。","authors":"Liang Liu ,&nbsp;Dongyao Jia ,&nbsp;Zihao He ,&nbsp;Baohong Wen ,&nbsp;Xiaopan Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaoqiang Han","doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The high heterogeneity observed among patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) underscores the need to identify neurophysiological OCD subtypes to facilitate personalized diagnosis and treatment. In this study, our aim was to identify potential OCD subtypes based on individualized functional connectome abnormalities. We recruited a total of 99 patients with OCD and 104 healthy controls (HCs) matched for demographic characteristics. Individualized functional connectome abnormalities were obtained using normative models of functional connectivity strength (FCS) and used as features to unveil OCD subtypes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reproducibility and robustness of the clustering outcomes. Patients exhibited significant intersubject heterogeneity in individualized functional connectome abnormalities. Two subtypes with distinct patterns of FCS abnormalities relative to HCs were identified. Subtype 1 patients primarily exhibited significantly decreased FCS in regions including the frontal gyrus, insula, hippocampus, and precentral/postcentral gyrus, whereas subtype 2 patients demonstrated increased FCS in widespread brain regions. When all patients were combined, no significant differences were observed. Additionally, the identified subtypes showed significant differences in age of onset. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses confirmed the reproducibility of our subtyping results. In conclusion, the identified OCD subtypes shed new light on the taxonomy and neurophysiological heterogeneity of OCD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54549,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 111122"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualized functional connectome abnormalities obtained using two normative model unveil neurophysiological subtypes of obsessive compulsive disorder\",\"authors\":\"Liang Liu ,&nbsp;Dongyao Jia ,&nbsp;Zihao He ,&nbsp;Baohong Wen ,&nbsp;Xiaopan Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaoqiang Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The high heterogeneity observed among patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) underscores the need to identify neurophysiological OCD subtypes to facilitate personalized diagnosis and treatment. In this study, our aim was to identify potential OCD subtypes based on individualized functional connectome abnormalities. We recruited a total of 99 patients with OCD and 104 healthy controls (HCs) matched for demographic characteristics. Individualized functional connectome abnormalities were obtained using normative models of functional connectivity strength (FCS) and used as features to unveil OCD subtypes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reproducibility and robustness of the clustering outcomes. Patients exhibited significant intersubject heterogeneity in individualized functional connectome abnormalities. Two subtypes with distinct patterns of FCS abnormalities relative to HCs were identified. Subtype 1 patients primarily exhibited significantly decreased FCS in regions including the frontal gyrus, insula, hippocampus, and precentral/postcentral gyrus, whereas subtype 2 patients demonstrated increased FCS in widespread brain regions. When all patients were combined, no significant differences were observed. Additionally, the identified subtypes showed significant differences in age of onset. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses confirmed the reproducibility of our subtyping results. In conclusion, the identified OCD subtypes shed new light on the taxonomy and neurophysiological heterogeneity of OCD.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584624001908\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584624001908","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在强迫症(OCD)患者中观察到的高度异质性强调了识别神经生理学强迫症亚型以促进个性化诊断和治疗的必要性。在这项研究中,我们的目的是根据个体化的功能连接组异常确定潜在的强迫症亚型。我们共招募了 99 名强迫症患者和 104 名与人口统计学特征相匹配的健康对照组(HCs)。我们使用功能连接强度(FCS)的常模获得了个体化的功能连接组异常,并将其作为揭示强迫症亚型的特征。为了评估聚类结果的可重复性和稳健性,我们进行了敏感性分析。患者在个体化功能连接组异常方面表现出明显的受试者间异质性。与 HCs 相比,两种亚型的 FCS 异常模式截然不同。亚型1患者主要表现为额回、脑岛、海马和中枢前/后回等区域的FCS明显减少,而亚型2患者则表现为广泛脑区的FCS增加。如果将所有患者合并计算,则未观察到明显差异。此外,已确定的亚型在发病年龄上也存在显著差异。此外,敏感性分析证实了我们的亚型划分结果的可重复性。总之,已确定的强迫症亚型为强迫症的分类和神经生理学异质性提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individualized functional connectome abnormalities obtained using two normative model unveil neurophysiological subtypes of obsessive compulsive disorder

The high heterogeneity observed among patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) underscores the need to identify neurophysiological OCD subtypes to facilitate personalized diagnosis and treatment. In this study, our aim was to identify potential OCD subtypes based on individualized functional connectome abnormalities. We recruited a total of 99 patients with OCD and 104 healthy controls (HCs) matched for demographic characteristics. Individualized functional connectome abnormalities were obtained using normative models of functional connectivity strength (FCS) and used as features to unveil OCD subtypes. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reproducibility and robustness of the clustering outcomes. Patients exhibited significant intersubject heterogeneity in individualized functional connectome abnormalities. Two subtypes with distinct patterns of FCS abnormalities relative to HCs were identified. Subtype 1 patients primarily exhibited significantly decreased FCS in regions including the frontal gyrus, insula, hippocampus, and precentral/postcentral gyrus, whereas subtype 2 patients demonstrated increased FCS in widespread brain regions. When all patients were combined, no significant differences were observed. Additionally, the identified subtypes showed significant differences in age of onset. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses confirmed the reproducibility of our subtyping results. In conclusion, the identified OCD subtypes shed new light on the taxonomy and neurophysiological heterogeneity of OCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry is an international and multidisciplinary journal which aims to ensure the rapid publication of authoritative reviews and research papers dealing with experimental and clinical aspects of neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry. Issues of the journal are regularly devoted wholly in or in part to a topical subject. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry does not publish work on the actions of biological extracts unless the pharmacological active molecular substrate and/or specific receptor binding properties of the extract compounds are elucidated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信