慢性阻塞性肺病患者的双任务表现:带 Meta 分析的系统性综述。

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1230287
Joselyn González Pasten, Jennifer Campos Aguayo, Javiera Aburto, Felipe Araya-Quintanilla, Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Juan José Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Pat G Camp, Walter Sepúlveda-Loyola
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病患者的双任务表现:带 Meta 分析的系统性综述。","authors":"Joselyn González Pasten, Jennifer Campos Aguayo, Javiera Aburto, Felipe Araya-Quintanilla, Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Juan José Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Pat G Camp, Walter Sepúlveda-Loyola","doi":"10.1155/2024/1230287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by important extrapulmonary alterations that could affect the performance in dual task (DT) (motor and cognitive tasks executed simultaneously), which is defined as DT interference (DTI). <b>Objective:</b> To compare the performance of DT between individuals with COPD and healthy control subjects (HCSs). <b>Methods:</b> The literature search was conducted in seven databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar) up to December 2023, including studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Studies with individuals diagnosed with COPD older than 60 years, who were evaluated with any DT assessment, and compared with HCS were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). The meta-analysis was performed with JAMOVI software 5.4. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023435212). <b>Results:</b> From a total of 128 articles, 5 observational studies were selected in this review, involving 252 individuals aged between 60 and 80 years, from France, Italy, Canada, Turkey, and Belgium. Notable DTI was observed in individuals with COPD compared to HCS (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-1.75, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Individuals with COPD had impaired gait speed, balance control, muscle strength, and cognitive interference during DT compared to HCS. DT assessment protocols included different combination of motor and cognitive tasks, using functional test, gait analysis, and muscle strength paired with countdown and verbal fluency tasks. Studies presented low (<i>n</i> = 2), moderate (<i>n</i> = 1), and serious (<i>n</i> = 2) overall risk of bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> Older adults diagnosed with COPD exhibited a significant DTI compared to HCSs, which is characterized by poorer physical and cognitive performance during DT execution. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating DT assessments into clinical practice for individuals with COPD.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual-Task Performance in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Joselyn González Pasten, Jennifer Campos Aguayo, Javiera Aburto, Felipe Araya-Quintanilla, Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Juan José Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Pat G Camp, Walter Sepúlveda-Loyola\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1230287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by important extrapulmonary alterations that could affect the performance in dual task (DT) (motor and cognitive tasks executed simultaneously), which is defined as DT interference (DTI). <b>Objective:</b> To compare the performance of DT between individuals with COPD and healthy control subjects (HCSs). <b>Methods:</b> The literature search was conducted in seven databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar) up to December 2023, including studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Studies with individuals diagnosed with COPD older than 60 years, who were evaluated with any DT assessment, and compared with HCS were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). The meta-analysis was performed with JAMOVI software 5.4. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023435212). <b>Results:</b> From a total of 128 articles, 5 observational studies were selected in this review, involving 252 individuals aged between 60 and 80 years, from France, Italy, Canada, Turkey, and Belgium. Notable DTI was observed in individuals with COPD compared to HCS (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-1.75, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Individuals with COPD had impaired gait speed, balance control, muscle strength, and cognitive interference during DT compared to HCS. DT assessment protocols included different combination of motor and cognitive tasks, using functional test, gait analysis, and muscle strength paired with countdown and verbal fluency tasks. Studies presented low (<i>n</i> = 2), moderate (<i>n</i> = 1), and serious (<i>n</i> = 2) overall risk of bias. <b>Conclusion:</b> Older adults diagnosed with COPD exhibited a significant DTI compared to HCSs, which is characterized by poorer physical and cognitive performance during DT execution. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating DT assessments into clinical practice for individuals with COPD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11330333/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1230287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1230287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的特点是重要的肺外改变,可能影响双重任务(DT)(同时执行运动和认知任务)的表现,这被定义为 DT 干扰(DTI)。目的比较慢性阻塞性肺病患者和健康对照受试者(HCSs)的 DT 表现。方法在截至 2023 年 12 月的七个数据库(Medline、Scopus、Web of Science、PEDro、SciELO、LILACS 和 Google Scholar)中进行文献检索,包括以英语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语发表的研究。研究对象包括 60 岁以上确诊为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者,他们接受了任何 DT 评估,并与 HCS 进行了比较。研究质量采用非随机干预研究偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)进行评估。荟萃分析使用 JAMOVI 软件 5.4 进行。研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023435212)上注册。研究结果本综述从 128 篇文章中选出了 5 项观察性研究,涉及 252 名年龄在 60 至 80 岁之间的患者,他们分别来自法国、意大利、加拿大、土耳其和比利时。与慢性阻塞性肺病患者相比,慢性阻塞性肺病患者的 DTI 显著增加(标准平均差 [SMD] = 0.91;95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.06-1.75,P = 0.04)。与 HCS 相比,慢性阻塞性肺病患者在 DT 过程中的步速、平衡控制、肌肉力量和认知干扰都有所减弱。DT 评估方案包括不同的运动和认知任务组合,使用功能测试、步态分析、肌力与倒计时和语言流畅性任务配对。研究的总体偏倚风险较低(2 项)、中等(1 项)和严重(2 项)。结论与高危人群相比,诊断出慢性阻塞性肺病的老年人表现出明显的 DTI,其特点是在执行 DT 时身体和认知表现较差。这些发现强调了将 DT 评估纳入慢性阻塞性肺病患者临床实践的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dual-Task Performance in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by important extrapulmonary alterations that could affect the performance in dual task (DT) (motor and cognitive tasks executed simultaneously), which is defined as DT interference (DTI). Objective: To compare the performance of DT between individuals with COPD and healthy control subjects (HCSs). Methods: The literature search was conducted in seven databases (Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, PEDro, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar) up to December 2023, including studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. Studies with individuals diagnosed with COPD older than 60 years, who were evaluated with any DT assessment, and compared with HCS were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). The meta-analysis was performed with JAMOVI software 5.4. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023435212). Results: From a total of 128 articles, 5 observational studies were selected in this review, involving 252 individuals aged between 60 and 80 years, from France, Italy, Canada, Turkey, and Belgium. Notable DTI was observed in individuals with COPD compared to HCS (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-1.75, p = 0.04). Individuals with COPD had impaired gait speed, balance control, muscle strength, and cognitive interference during DT compared to HCS. DT assessment protocols included different combination of motor and cognitive tasks, using functional test, gait analysis, and muscle strength paired with countdown and verbal fluency tasks. Studies presented low (n = 2), moderate (n = 1), and serious (n = 2) overall risk of bias. Conclusion: Older adults diagnosed with COPD exhibited a significant DTI compared to HCSs, which is characterized by poorer physical and cognitive performance during DT execution. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating DT assessments into clinical practice for individuals with COPD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信