超声心动图在重症监护休克治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性、多中心观察研究。

IF 27.1 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6
Luke Flower, Alicia Waite, Adam Boulton, Marcus Peck, Waqas Akhtar, Andrew J Boyle, Sandeep Gudibande, Thomas E Ingram, Brian Johnston, Sarah Marsh, Ashley Miller, Amy Nash, Olusegun Olusanya, Prashant Parulekar, Daniel Wagstaff, Jonathan Wilkinson, Alastair G Proudfoot
{"title":"超声心动图在重症监护休克治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性、多中心观察研究。","authors":"Luke Flower, Alicia Waite, Adam Boulton, Marcus Peck, Waqas Akhtar, Andrew J Boyle, Sandeep Gudibande, Thomas E Ingram, Brian Johnston, Sarah Marsh, Ashley Miller, Amy Nash, Olusegun Olusanya, Prashant Parulekar, Daniel Wagstaff, Jonathan Wilkinson, Alastair G Proudfoot","doi":"10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK's Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":13665,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":27.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Luke Flower, Alicia Waite, Adam Boulton, Marcus Peck, Waqas Akhtar, Andrew J Boyle, Sandeep Gudibande, Thomas E Ingram, Brian Johnston, Sarah Marsh, Ashley Miller, Amy Nash, Olusegun Olusanya, Prashant Parulekar, Daniel Wagstaff, Jonathan Wilkinson, Alastair G Proudfoot\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK's Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":27.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07590-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建议将超声心动图作为评估休克患者的一线工具。目前在重症监护中提供的超声心动图并不明确。这项工作的目的是评估休克重症患者的超声心动图使用情况、其对决策的影响以及对管理指南的遵守情况:我们在英国和英国属地的 178 个重症监护病房开展了一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,该研究由英国重症监护培训研究网络(UK's Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network)领导。对连续入院的休克成人患者(≥ 18 岁)进行了 72 小时的随访,以确定他们是否接受了超声心动图检查、所做扫描的性质及其对危重症治疗决策的影响:结果:共纳入 1015 名休克患者。545名患者(54%)在入院72小时内接受了超声心动图检查,436名患者(43%)在入院24小时内接受了超声心动图检查。大多数扫描由重症监护团队完成(n = 314,58%)。据报道,在 291 例(54%)患者中,超声心动图检查减少了诊断的不确定性或改变了处理方法。阻塞性休克或心源性休克患者通过超声心动图改变治疗方案的比例更高(分别为 15 例 [75%] 和 100 例 [58%])。25%的超声心动图检查符合现行的国家管理和图像存储指南:结论:在对休克患者进行评估时使用超声心动图的情况仍然参差不齐。在使用超声心动图时,它可提高诊断的确定性或改变大多数患者的治疗方案。未来的研究应探讨在评估休克患者时更多使用超声心动图的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

The use of echocardiography in the management of shock in critical care: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

Purpose: Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line tool in the assessment of patients with shock. The current provision of echocardiography in critical care is poorly defined. The aims of this work were to evaluate the utilisation of echocardiography in patients presenting to critical care with shock, its impact on decision making, and adherence to governance guidelines.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study in 178 critical care units across the United Kingdom (UK) and Crown Dependencies, led by the UK's Trainee Research in Intensive Care Network. Consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 years) admitted with shock were followed up for 72 h to ascertain whether they received an echocardiogram, the nature of any scan performed, and its effect on critical treatment decision making.

Results: 1015 patients with shock were included. An echocardiogram was performed on 545 (54%) patients within 72 h and 436 (43%) within 24 h of admission. Most scans were performed by the critical care team (n = 314, 58%). Echocardiography was reported to either reduce diagnostic uncertainty or change management in 291 (54%) cases. Patients with obstructive or cardiogenic shock had their management altered numerically more often by echocardiography (n = 15 [75%] and n = 100 [58%] respectively). Twenty-five percent of echocardiograms performed adhered to current national governance and image storage guidance.

Conclusion: Use of echocardiography in the assessment of patients with shock remains heterogenous. When echocardiography is used, it improves diagnostic certainty or changes management in most patients. Future research should explore barriers to increasing use of echocardiography in assessing patients presenting with shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine
Intensive Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
51.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
326
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Intensive Care Medicine is the premier publication platform fostering the communication and exchange of cutting-edge research and ideas within the field of intensive care medicine on a comprehensive scale. Catering to professionals involved in intensive medical care, including intensivists, medical specialists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals, ICM stands as the official journal of The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. ICM is dedicated to advancing the understanding and practice of intensive care medicine among professionals in Europe and beyond. The journal provides a robust platform for disseminating current research findings and innovative ideas in intensive care medicine. Content published in Intensive Care Medicine encompasses a wide range, including review articles, original research papers, letters, reviews, debates, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信