空腹条件下健康受试者服用阿法替尼二马来酸盐片剂两种制剂的生物等效性研究:一项随机、开放标签、单剂量、交叉试验。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yanping Liu, Lang Lü, Man Xu, Juanmin Tao, Yuping Ning, Yan Shi, Yanfen Dong, Qingqing Cao, Jun Ma, Yan Qiu
{"title":"空腹条件下健康受试者服用阿法替尼二马来酸盐片剂两种制剂的生物等效性研究:一项随机、开放标签、单剂量、交叉试验。","authors":"Yanping Liu, Lang Lü, Man Xu, Juanmin Tao, Yuping Ning, Yan Shi, Yanfen Dong, Qingqing Cao, Jun Ma, Yan Qiu","doi":"10.5414/CP204514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the bioequivalence of two different afatinib dimaleate formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions and to assess their pharmacokinetic and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, bioequivalence study included 32 healthy Chinese subjects. The subjects were assigned to receive a single 40-mg dose of generic or brand-named afatinib dimaleate tablet. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 120 hours after dosing. Healthy subjects orally took the trial preparation (T) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Jiangxi Shanxiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gan Zhou, China) and the reference preparation (R) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., Ingelheim, Germany) under fasting conditions in the appropriate period according to the randomization. We measured the blood concentrations, calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two preparations in the human body, and evaluated whether formulations were bioequivalent. Safety of the preparations in healthy subjects was monitored during the whole trial. Safety assessment was conducted by vital signs, physical examination, laboratory examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram during the study, i.e., from the time the subject received the test drug to the end of the last visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under fasting conditions, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for afatinib dimaleate were 93.34 - 103.92% for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, 90.26 - 105.52% for C<sub>max</sub>, and 93.49 - 104.05% for AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> were within the range of 80.00 - 125.00%, indicating that the test formulation was equivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. Both products were similar in terms of safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"479-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence study of two formulations of afatinib dimaleate tablets in healthy subjects under fasting conditions: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yanping Liu, Lang Lü, Man Xu, Juanmin Tao, Yuping Ning, Yan Shi, Yanfen Dong, Qingqing Cao, Jun Ma, Yan Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the bioequivalence of two different afatinib dimaleate formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions and to assess their pharmacokinetic and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, bioequivalence study included 32 healthy Chinese subjects. The subjects were assigned to receive a single 40-mg dose of generic or brand-named afatinib dimaleate tablet. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 120 hours after dosing. Healthy subjects orally took the trial preparation (T) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Jiangxi Shanxiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gan Zhou, China) and the reference preparation (R) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., Ingelheim, Germany) under fasting conditions in the appropriate period according to the randomization. We measured the blood concentrations, calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two preparations in the human body, and evaluated whether formulations were bioequivalent. Safety of the preparations in healthy subjects was monitored during the whole trial. Safety assessment was conducted by vital signs, physical examination, laboratory examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram during the study, i.e., from the time the subject received the test drug to the end of the last visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under fasting conditions, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for afatinib dimaleate were 93.34 - 103.92% for AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, 90.26 - 105.52% for C<sub>max</sub>, and 93.49 - 104.05% for AUC<sub>0-∞</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> were within the range of 80.00 - 125.00%, indicating that the test formulation was equivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. Both products were similar in terms of safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"479-485\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204514\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价两种不同阿法替尼二马来酸盐制剂在中国健康受试者空腹条件下的生物等效性,并评估其药代动力学和安全性:这项随机、开放标签、2期、交叉、生物等效性研究纳入了32名中国健康受试者。受试者被分配接受单次40毫克剂量的仿制药或品牌药阿法替尼二马来酸盐片剂。研究人员在用药前和用药后120小时内采集血样。健康受试者根据随机分配在适当时间内空腹口服试验制剂(T)(中国赣州江西山乡制药有限公司生产的马来酸阿法替尼片)和参比制剂(R)(德国英格尔海姆勃林格殷格翰制药有限公司生产的马来酸阿法替尼片)。我们测量了血药浓度,计算了两种制剂在人体内的药代动力学参数,并评估了制剂是否具有生物等效性。在整个试验过程中,我们对健康受试者体内制剂的安全性进行了监测。在研究期间,即从受试者接受试验药物到最后一次就诊结束,通过生命体征、体格检查、实验室检查和 12 导联心电图进行安全性评估:结果:在空腹条件下,阿法替尼二马来酸盐试验/参考的几何平均比值的90%置信区间(CIs)分别为:AUC0-t 93.34 - 103.92%,Cmax 90.26 - 105.52%,AUC0-∞ 93.49 - 104.05%:Cmax、AUC0-t 和 AUC0-∞ 的几何平均比值(试验/参比)的 90% CI 在 80.00 - 125.00% 的范围内,表明在空腹条件下,中国健康受试者的试验制剂与参比制剂具有等效性。两种产品的安全性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioequivalence study of two formulations of afatinib dimaleate tablets in healthy subjects under fasting conditions: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover trial.

Objective: To evaluate the bioequivalence of two different afatinib dimaleate formulations in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions and to assess their pharmacokinetic and safety profiles.

Materials and methods: This randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover, bioequivalence study included 32 healthy Chinese subjects. The subjects were assigned to receive a single 40-mg dose of generic or brand-named afatinib dimaleate tablet. Blood samples were collected pre-dose and up to 120 hours after dosing. Healthy subjects orally took the trial preparation (T) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Jiangxi Shanxiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Gan Zhou, China) and the reference preparation (R) (afatinib maleate tablets developed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., Ingelheim, Germany) under fasting conditions in the appropriate period according to the randomization. We measured the blood concentrations, calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two preparations in the human body, and evaluated whether formulations were bioequivalent. Safety of the preparations in healthy subjects was monitored during the whole trial. Safety assessment was conducted by vital signs, physical examination, laboratory examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram during the study, i.e., from the time the subject received the test drug to the end of the last visit.

Results: Under fasting conditions, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios of the test/reference for afatinib dimaleate were 93.34 - 103.92% for AUC0-t, 90.26 - 105.52% for Cmax, and 93.49 - 104.05% for AUC0-∞.

Conclusion: The 90% CI for the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were within the range of 80.00 - 125.00%, indicating that the test formulation was equivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting conditions. Both products were similar in terms of safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信