补充营养援助计划 (SNAP) 参与者网上购物的障碍和促进因素：混合方法研究。

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS

Ecology of Food and Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557

Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Rachel Gillespie, Emily DeWitt, Makenzie Barr, Brittany Cox, Travis Hudson, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Angela C B Trude, Alison Gustafson

{"title":"补充营养援助计划 (SNAP) 参与者网上购物的障碍和促进因素：混合方法研究。","authors":"Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Rachel Gillespie, Emily DeWitt, Makenzie Barr, Brittany Cox, Travis Hudson, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Angela C B Trude, Alison Gustafson","doi":"10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This mixed methods study explored online grocery shopping perceptions by surveying individuals who do and do not receive SNAP benefits (n = 129) and by conducting interviews with SNAP recipients (n = 26) who have grocery shopped online. T-tests assessed survey findings, codebook thematic analysis was used to identify qualitative themes, and results were interpreted collectively. Survey results found no differences in perceptions of online grocery shopping between SNAP and non-SNAP recipients (p-values = 0.2-1.0) and that 97% of SNAP recipients felt comfortable using SNAP online. Five qualitative themes were identified and provided context to the survey results. The study findings can inform policy actions within SNAP.","PeriodicalId":11511,"journal":{"name":"Ecology of Food and Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to Online Grocery Shopping Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Mixed Method Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Anderson Steeves, Rachel Gillespie, Emily DeWitt, Makenzie Barr, Brittany Cox, Travis Hudson, Lindsey Haynes-Maslow, Angela C B Trude, Alison Gustafson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This mixed methods study explored online grocery shopping perceptions by surveying individuals who do and do not receive SNAP benefits (n = 129) and by conducting interviews with SNAP recipients (n = 26) who have grocery shopped online. T-tests assessed survey findings, codebook thematic analysis was used to identify qualitative themes, and results were interpreted collectively. Survey results found no differences in perceptions of online grocery shopping between SNAP and non-SNAP recipients (p-values = 0.2-1.0) and that 97% of SNAP recipients felt comfortable using SNAP online. Five qualitative themes were identified and provided context to the survey results. The study findings can inform policy actions within SNAP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology of Food and Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology of Food and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology of Food and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2024.2392557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这项混合方法研究通过调查领取和未领取 SNAP 福利的个人（n = 129），以及对曾在网上购物的 SNAP 领取者（n = 26）进行访谈，探讨了他们对网上购物的看法。通过 T 检验对调查结果进行评估，使用编码本主题分析确定定性主题，并对结果进行综合解释。调查结果显示，SNAP 受助者和非 SNAP 受助者对网上购物的看法没有差异（P 值 = 0.2-1.0），97% 的 SNAP 受助者对在网上使用 SNAP 感到舒适。研究确定了五个定性主题，为调查结果提供了背景信息。研究结果可为 SNAP 的政策行动提供参考。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Barriers and Facilitators to Online Grocery Shopping Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Participants: A Mixed Method Study.

This mixed methods study explored online grocery shopping perceptions by surveying individuals who do and do not receive SNAP benefits (n = 129) and by conducting interviews with SNAP recipients (n = 26) who have grocery shopped online. T-tests assessed survey findings, codebook thematic analysis was used to identify qualitative themes, and results were interpreted collectively. Survey results found no differences in perceptions of online grocery shopping between SNAP and non-SNAP recipients (p-values = 0.2-1.0) and that 97% of SNAP recipients felt comfortable using SNAP online. Five qualitative themes were identified and provided context to the survey results. The study findings can inform policy actions within SNAP.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ecology of Food and Nutrition 医学-营养学

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Ecology of Food and Nutrition is an international journal of food and nutrition in the broadest sense. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of food and nutrition -- ecological, biological, and cultural. Ecology of Food and Nutrition strives to become a forum for disseminating scholarly information on the holistic and cross-cultural dimensions of the study of food and nutrition. It emphasizes foods and food systems not only in terms of their utilization to satisfy human nutritional needs and health, but also to promote and contest social and cultural identity. The content scope is thus wide -- articles may focus on the relationship between food and nutrition, food taboos and preferences, ecology and political economy of food, the evolution of human nutrition, changes in food habits, food technology and marketing, food and identity, and food sustainability. Additionally, articles focusing on the application of theories and methods to address contemporary food and nutrition problems are encouraged. Questions of the relationship between food/nutrition and culture are as germane to the journal as analyses of the interactions among nutrition and environment, infection and human health.