{"title":"论最优电力流的非凸可行区域:理论、程度和影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The non-convexity of the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) feasible region complicates the solution process and affects the applicability of various optimization techniques, which is crucial for understanding the OPF problem. This paper systematically investigates the non-convexity properties of the AC OPF feasible (power) injection region (FIR) and identifies key factors influencing its non-convexity from both analytical and numerical perspectives. Specifically, a necessary condition for FIR convexity and a sufficient condition for FIR non-convexity are derived. Based on these findings, it is concluded that the feasible region of ACOPF is inherently non-convex, with network losses playing a significant role. To avoid misjudgment of non-convexity, a non-convexity degree index for the FIR is introduced, and a numerical method to compute it is proposed. Numerical results on 9-bus and 57-bus systems indicate that the non-convexity degree of a lossless FIR is 0, whereas for a lossy FIR, it ranges from 70% to 100%. Furthermore, factors contributing to non-convexity and their impact on the location of the optimal solution and the effectiveness of convex relaxation methods (CRMs) are discussed. The numerical results demonstrate that for the same system, the optimality gap of CRMs can be as low as 0.02% in lossless networks but increases to 0.28% or more in lossy networks. These findings elucidate the relationship between network losses and the optimality gap of CRMs, providing deeper insights into the characteristics of the ACOPF problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524003880/pdfft?md5=96d1a5ad0b123e2939fa2731e0e7d2cc&pid=1-s2.0-S0142061524003880-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the nonconvex feasible region of optimal power flow: Theory, degree, and impacts\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The non-convexity of the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) feasible region complicates the solution process and affects the applicability of various optimization techniques, which is crucial for understanding the OPF problem. This paper systematically investigates the non-convexity properties of the AC OPF feasible (power) injection region (FIR) and identifies key factors influencing its non-convexity from both analytical and numerical perspectives. Specifically, a necessary condition for FIR convexity and a sufficient condition for FIR non-convexity are derived. Based on these findings, it is concluded that the feasible region of ACOPF is inherently non-convex, with network losses playing a significant role. To avoid misjudgment of non-convexity, a non-convexity degree index for the FIR is introduced, and a numerical method to compute it is proposed. Numerical results on 9-bus and 57-bus systems indicate that the non-convexity degree of a lossless FIR is 0, whereas for a lossy FIR, it ranges from 70% to 100%. Furthermore, factors contributing to non-convexity and their impact on the location of the optimal solution and the effectiveness of convex relaxation methods (CRMs) are discussed. The numerical results demonstrate that for the same system, the optimality gap of CRMs can be as low as 0.02% in lossless networks but increases to 0.28% or more in lossy networks. These findings elucidate the relationship between network losses and the optimality gap of CRMs, providing deeper insights into the characteristics of the ACOPF problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524003880/pdfft?md5=96d1a5ad0b123e2939fa2731e0e7d2cc&pid=1-s2.0-S0142061524003880-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524003880\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061524003880","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最佳功率流(OPF)可行区域的非凸性使求解过程变得复杂,并影响各种优化技术的适用性,这对理解 OPF 问题至关重要。本文系统地研究了交流 OPF 可行(功率)注入区域(FIR)的非凸特性,并从分析和数值角度找出了影响其非凸性的关键因素。具体而言,本文得出了 FIR 凸性的必要条件和 FIR 非凸性的充分条件。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,ACOPF 的可行区域本质上是非凸的,其中网络损耗起着重要作用。为避免对非凸度的误判,引入了 FIR 的非凸度指数,并提出了计算该指数的数值方法。9 总线和 57 总线系统的数值结果表明,无损 FIR 的非凸度为 0,而有损 FIR 的非凸度在 70% 到 100% 之间。此外,还讨论了导致非凸的因素及其对最优解位置和凸松弛方法(CRM)有效性的影响。数值结果表明,对于同一系统,在无损网络中,CRM 的最优性差距可低至 0.02%,但在有损网络中,这一差距可增至 0.28% 或更高。这些发现阐明了网络损耗与 CRM 最佳间隙之间的关系,为深入了解 ACOPF 问题的特征提供了依据。
On the nonconvex feasible region of optimal power flow: Theory, degree, and impacts
The non-convexity of the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) feasible region complicates the solution process and affects the applicability of various optimization techniques, which is crucial for understanding the OPF problem. This paper systematically investigates the non-convexity properties of the AC OPF feasible (power) injection region (FIR) and identifies key factors influencing its non-convexity from both analytical and numerical perspectives. Specifically, a necessary condition for FIR convexity and a sufficient condition for FIR non-convexity are derived. Based on these findings, it is concluded that the feasible region of ACOPF is inherently non-convex, with network losses playing a significant role. To avoid misjudgment of non-convexity, a non-convexity degree index for the FIR is introduced, and a numerical method to compute it is proposed. Numerical results on 9-bus and 57-bus systems indicate that the non-convexity degree of a lossless FIR is 0, whereas for a lossy FIR, it ranges from 70% to 100%. Furthermore, factors contributing to non-convexity and their impact on the location of the optimal solution and the effectiveness of convex relaxation methods (CRMs) are discussed. The numerical results demonstrate that for the same system, the optimality gap of CRMs can be as low as 0.02% in lossless networks but increases to 0.28% or more in lossy networks. These findings elucidate the relationship between network losses and the optimality gap of CRMs, providing deeper insights into the characteristics of the ACOPF problem.
期刊介绍:
The journal covers theoretical developments in electrical power and energy systems and their applications. The coverage embraces: generation and network planning; reliability; long and short term operation; expert systems; neural networks; object oriented systems; system control centres; database and information systems; stock and parameter estimation; system security and adequacy; network theory, modelling and computation; small and large system dynamics; dynamic model identification; on-line control including load and switching control; protection; distribution systems; energy economics; impact of non-conventional systems; and man-machine interfaces.
As well as original research papers, the journal publishes short contributions, book reviews and conference reports. All papers are peer-reviewed by at least two referees.