埃塞俄比亚南部西古吉传统牧场管理战略的木质树种固碳和土壤种子库保护潜力

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jatani Garbole , Beyene Teklu
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚南部西古吉传统牧场管理战略的木质树种固碳和土壤种子库保护潜力","authors":"Jatani Garbole ,&nbsp;Beyene Teklu","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rangelands are important for mitigating climate change and rehabilitating land by storing carbon from woody plants and seeds in the soil. However, there is a lack of empirical data on how traditional rangeland management practices (such as enclosure, communal grazing and prescribed fire) affect the carbon storage of woody species and the conservation potential of soil seed banks. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration and soil seed bank conservation potential of traditional rangeland management practices in the Western Guji zone, Ethiopia. A total of 32 sample plots were established using systematic random sampling, with 12 in each management practice, to measure woody biomass and estimate carbon stock using a nondestructive method. Additionally, 72 soil samples were collected for soil seed bank analysis, with 24 samples taken from each type of rangeland management practice. The study found that enclosures had the highest amount of carbon stocks 63.1 tons per hectare (t ha<sup>−1</sup>), with a corresponding carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) sequestration of 231.58 t ha<sup>-</sup>1, followed by communal grazing areas that stored 27.05 t ha<sup>−1</sup> of carbon with a CO<sub>2</sub>e sequestration of 99.27 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. Prescribed fire had the lowest carbon stocks at 19.39 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, with a CO<sub>2</sub>e sequestration of 71.16 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The study also found that different traditional rangeland management practices significantly influenced the diversity, richness, and density of woody species in soil seed banks. The highest Shannon diversity was recorded in enclosures (3.56 ± 0.09), followed by communal grazing (2.87 ± 0.14) and prescribed fire (1.27 ± 0.08). As a result, enclosure promotes the storage of carbon in woody plants and increases the diversity, density, and richness of woody species seeds in the soil, while prescribed fire reduces it. Therefore, it recommend for pastoralists to expand the use of enclosures as it improves the potential for conserving carbon stocks and soil seed banks of woody species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100459"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001272/pdfft?md5=e042615f71098dd735541db7a2b9d638&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724001272-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Woody species’ carbon sequestration and soil seed bank conservation potentials of traditional rangeland management strategies in Western Guji, Southern Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Jatani Garbole ,&nbsp;Beyene Teklu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100459\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rangelands are important for mitigating climate change and rehabilitating land by storing carbon from woody plants and seeds in the soil. However, there is a lack of empirical data on how traditional rangeland management practices (such as enclosure, communal grazing and prescribed fire) affect the carbon storage of woody species and the conservation potential of soil seed banks. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration and soil seed bank conservation potential of traditional rangeland management practices in the Western Guji zone, Ethiopia. A total of 32 sample plots were established using systematic random sampling, with 12 in each management practice, to measure woody biomass and estimate carbon stock using a nondestructive method. Additionally, 72 soil samples were collected for soil seed bank analysis, with 24 samples taken from each type of rangeland management practice. The study found that enclosures had the highest amount of carbon stocks 63.1 tons per hectare (t ha<sup>−1</sup>), with a corresponding carbon dioxide equivalent (CO<sub>2</sub>e) sequestration of 231.58 t ha<sup>-</sup>1, followed by communal grazing areas that stored 27.05 t ha<sup>−1</sup> of carbon with a CO<sub>2</sub>e sequestration of 99.27 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. Prescribed fire had the lowest carbon stocks at 19.39 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, with a CO<sub>2</sub>e sequestration of 71.16 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The study also found that different traditional rangeland management practices significantly influenced the diversity, richness, and density of woody species in soil seed banks. The highest Shannon diversity was recorded in enclosures (3.56 ± 0.09), followed by communal grazing (2.87 ± 0.14) and prescribed fire (1.27 ± 0.08). As a result, enclosure promotes the storage of carbon in woody plants and increases the diversity, density, and richness of woody species seeds in the soil, while prescribed fire reduces it. Therefore, it recommend for pastoralists to expand the use of enclosures as it improves the potential for conserving carbon stocks and soil seed banks of woody species.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"volume\":\"23 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001272/pdfft?md5=e042615f71098dd735541db7a2b9d638&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724001272-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724001272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牧场通过将木本植物和种子的碳储存在土壤中,对减缓气候变化和恢复土地十分重要。然而,关于传统牧场管理方法(如圈地、集体放牧和放火)如何影响木本植物的碳储存和土壤种子库的保护潜力,目前还缺乏实证数据。本研究评估了埃塞俄比亚西古吉地区传统牧场管理方法的碳封存和土壤种子库保护潜力。研究采用系统随机抽样的方法,共建立了 32 个样地,每个管理方法有 12 个样地,采用非破坏性方法测量木质生物量并估算碳储量。此外,还收集了 72 个土壤样本用于土壤种子库分析,每种牧场管理方法各取 24 个样本。研究发现,围栏的碳储量最高,为每公顷 63.1 吨(t ha-1),相应的二氧化碳当量(CO2e)封存量为每公顷 231.58 吨(t ha-1);其次是公共放牧区,碳储量为每公顷 27.05 吨(t ha-1),二氧化碳当量(CO2e)封存量为每公顷 99.27 吨(t ha-1)。人工放火的碳储量最低,为 19.39 吨/公顷-1,CO2e 固碳量为 71.16 吨/公顷-1。研究还发现,不同的传统牧场管理方法会显著影响土壤种子库中木本物种的多样性、丰富度和密度。围栏(3.56 ± 0.09)记录的香农多样性最高,其次是集体放牧(2.87 ± 0.14)和明火(1.27 ± 0.08)。因此,围栏能促进木本植物的碳储存,增加土壤中木本物种种子的多样性、密度和丰富度,而明火则会减少碳储存。因此,建议牧民扩大围栏的使用范围,因为它提高了保护碳储量和土壤中木本物种种子库的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Woody species’ carbon sequestration and soil seed bank conservation potentials of traditional rangeland management strategies in Western Guji, Southern Ethiopia

Woody species’ carbon sequestration and soil seed bank conservation potentials of traditional rangeland management strategies in Western Guji, Southern Ethiopia

Rangelands are important for mitigating climate change and rehabilitating land by storing carbon from woody plants and seeds in the soil. However, there is a lack of empirical data on how traditional rangeland management practices (such as enclosure, communal grazing and prescribed fire) affect the carbon storage of woody species and the conservation potential of soil seed banks. This study evaluates the carbon sequestration and soil seed bank conservation potential of traditional rangeland management practices in the Western Guji zone, Ethiopia. A total of 32 sample plots were established using systematic random sampling, with 12 in each management practice, to measure woody biomass and estimate carbon stock using a nondestructive method. Additionally, 72 soil samples were collected for soil seed bank analysis, with 24 samples taken from each type of rangeland management practice. The study found that enclosures had the highest amount of carbon stocks 63.1 tons per hectare (t ha−1), with a corresponding carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) sequestration of 231.58 t ha-1, followed by communal grazing areas that stored 27.05 t ha−1 of carbon with a CO2e sequestration of 99.27 t ha−1. Prescribed fire had the lowest carbon stocks at 19.39 t ha−1, with a CO2e sequestration of 71.16 t ha−1. The study also found that different traditional rangeland management practices significantly influenced the diversity, richness, and density of woody species in soil seed banks. The highest Shannon diversity was recorded in enclosures (3.56 ± 0.09), followed by communal grazing (2.87 ± 0.14) and prescribed fire (1.27 ± 0.08). As a result, enclosure promotes the storage of carbon in woody plants and increases the diversity, density, and richness of woody species seeds in the soil, while prescribed fire reduces it. Therefore, it recommend for pastoralists to expand the use of enclosures as it improves the potential for conserving carbon stocks and soil seed banks of woody species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信