Michael B Palillo, Noah Mishkin, Mert Aydin, Anthony Mourino, Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona, Neil S Lipman
{"title":"研究鼠衣原体的笼间传播:屏障饲养和笼子消毒的影响。","authors":"Michael B Palillo, Noah Mishkin, Mert Aydin, Anthony Mourino, Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona, Neil S Lipman","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Chlamydia muridarum</i> (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-<i>Prkdc</i><sup>scid</sup> <i>Il2rg<sup>tm1Wjl</sup></i>/SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups (<i>n</i> = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; <i>n</i> = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; <i>n</i> = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; <i>n</i> = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Intercage Transmission of <i>Chlamydia muridarum</i>: Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization.\",\"authors\":\"Michael B Palillo, Noah Mishkin, Mert Aydin, Anthony Mourino, Rodolfo J Ricart Arbona, Neil S Lipman\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Chlamydia muridarum</i> (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-<i>Prkdc</i><sup>scid</sup> <i>Il2rg<sup>tm1Wjl</sup></i>/SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups (<i>n</i> = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; <i>n</i> = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; <i>n</i> = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; <i>n</i> = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467882/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
鼠衣原体(Cm)已重新成为学术研究小鼠群体中的一种普遍细菌污染物。我们进行了一项研究,以评估饲养和笼子消毒方法在防止 Cm 笼间传播方面的有效性。为了评估换笼期间的笼间传播,将饲养 2 只无 Cm 的瑞士韦伯斯特(SW;Tac:SW)哨兵小鼠的笼子随机放置在 12 个独立通风的笼架中的每一个上,这些笼架位于 2 个动物饲养室中的一个,饲养有 Cm 脱落小鼠的笼子。对研究笼子视而不见的饲养人员每周使用微隔离笼技术更换动物饲养室中的所有笼子。放置 180 天后进行的 PCR 检测证实,所有小鼠的 Cm 检测结果均为阴性。为了评估笼子消毒消除 Cm 的效果,我们调查了 Cm 向天真无 Cm 的 SW 和 NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) 小鼠的传播情况,这两只小鼠在分配给 3 组(n = 10 对小鼠/组)的笼子中同居 7 d(每周重复 4 周)。之前饲养过2 Cm脱落BALB/c小鼠的笼子要么在隧道式清洗机中清洗(82.2 °C[180°F],最后冲洗,平均每次16秒;n = 10),清洗后高压灭菌(121 °C,20分钟;n = 10),要么不做处理(仅更换垫料;n = 10)。通过 PCR 对每个笼子消毒前和消毒后的拭子进行 Cm 检测。所有处理前的拭子检测结果均为阳性,而来自所有笼子(不包括更换垫料)的处理后拭子检测结果均为阴性。经 PCR 检测,所有 SW 和 NSG 小鼠(无论哪个组)的 Cm 检测结果均为阴性。这些结果表明,传染性 Cm 不会在未经处理的笼子中或在经过或未经高压灭菌的机械清洗后继续存在。总之,这些结果表明,无论是我们的饲养规程还是不适当的笼子消毒方法,都不可能导致在当代研究小鼠群中观察到的 Cm 流行。
Examining Intercage Transmission of Chlamydia muridarum: Impact of Barrier Husbandry and Cage Sanitization.
Chlamydia muridarum (Cm) has reemerged as a prevalent bacterial contaminant of academic research mouse colonies. A study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of husbandry and cage sanitization methods in preventing intercage transmission of Cm. To assess intercage transmission during cage change, a cage housing 2 Cm-free Swiss Webster (SW; Tac:SW) sentinel mice was placed randomly on each of 12 individually ventilated cage racks, housing cages with Cm-shedding mice, located in one of 2 animal holding rooms. Husbandry staff blinded to the study cages changed all cages in the animal holding rooms weekly using a microisolation cage technique. PCR testing performed at 180 d postplacement confirmed all mice remained negative for Cm. To assess the effectiveness of cage sanitization to eliminate Cm, we investigated transmission of Cm to a naive Cm-free SW and NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mouse cohoused for 7 d (repeated weekly for 4 wk) in cages assigned to one of 3 groups (n = 10 pairs of mice/group). Cages that previously housed 2 Cm-shedding BALB/c mice were either washed in a tunnel washer (82.2 °C [180 °F] final rinse for an average of 16 s per run; n = 10) with and without postwashing autoclaving (121 °C for 20 min; n = 10), or were untreated (bedding change only; n = 10). Pre- and postsanitization swabs of each cage were assayed for Cm by PCR. All pretreatment swabs tested positive, while posttreatment swabs from all cages (excluding bedding change) tested negative. All SW and NSG mice, irrespective of group, remained negative for Cm as determined by PCR. These findings suggest that infectious Cm does not persist in untreated cages or after mechanical washing with and without autoclaving. Collectively, these findings suggest that neither our husbandry protocols nor inadequate cage sanitization methods likely contributed to the observed prevalence of Cm in contemporary research mouse colonies.