患者问，病理学家答：关于前列腺癌分级的十个问题。

IF 3.4 3区医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY

Virchows Archiv Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9

Alessia Cimadamore, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Carmine Franzese, Gianluca Giannarini, Alessandro Crestani, Eamonn T Rogers, Rodolfo Montironi

{"title":"患者问，病理学家答：关于前列腺癌分级的十个问题。","authors":"Alessia Cimadamore, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Carmine Franzese, Gianluca Giannarini, Alessandro Crestani, Eamonn T Rogers, Rodolfo Montironi","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pathologists have closely collaborated with clinicians, mainly urologists, to update the Gleason grading system to reflect the current practice and approach in prostate cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This has led to the development of what is called patient advocacy and patient information. Ten common questions asked by patients to pathologists concerning PCa grading and the answers given by the latter are reported.","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients ask and pathologists answer: ten questions around prostate cancer grading.\",\"authors\":\"Alessia Cimadamore, Liang Cheng, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Carmine Franzese, Gianluca Giannarini, Alessandro Crestani, Eamonn T Rogers, Rodolfo Montironi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pathologists have closely collaborated with clinicians, mainly urologists, to update the Gleason grading system to reflect the current practice and approach in prostate cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This has led to the development of what is called patient advocacy and patient information. Ten common questions asked by patients to pathologists concerning PCa grading and the answers given by the latter are reported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

病理学家与临床医生（主要是泌尿科医生）密切合作，更新格里森分级系统，以反映当前前列腺癌诊断、预后和治疗的实践和方法。这导致了所谓的患者宣传和患者信息的发展。本文报告了患者向病理学家提出的有关前列腺癌分级的十个常见问题以及病理学家给出的答案。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Patients ask and pathologists answer: ten questions around prostate cancer grading.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Patients ask and pathologists answer: ten questions around prostate cancer grading.

Pathologists have closely collaborated with clinicians, mainly urologists, to update the Gleason grading system to reflect the current practice and approach in prostate cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. This has led to the development of what is called patient advocacy and patient information. Ten common questions asked by patients to pathologists concerning PCa grading and the answers given by the latter are reported.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学

CiteScore

7.40

自引率

2.90%

发文量

204

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.