动态管理:干细胞研究同意的新时代。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Stem Cell Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-10 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.006
Rosario Isasi, Heidi B Bentzen, Morris Fabbri, Antonie Fuhr, Joel C Glover, Nancy Mah, Deborah Mascalzoni, Sabine Mueller, Stefanie Seltmann, Andreas Kurtz
{"title":"动态管理:干细胞研究同意的新时代。","authors":"Rosario Isasi, Heidi B Bentzen, Morris Fabbri, Antonie Fuhr, Joel C Glover, Nancy Mah, Deborah Mascalzoni, Sabine Mueller, Stefanie Seltmann, Andreas Kurtz","doi":"10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Governance infrastructures streamline scientific and ethical provenance verification of human pluripotent stem cell (SC) lines. Yet, scientific developments (e.g., SC-derived embryo models, organoids) challenge research governance approaches to stored biospecimens, questioning the validity of informed consent (IC) models. Likewise, e-health platforms are driving major transformations in data processing, prompting a reappraisal of IC. Given these developments, participatory research platforms are identified as effective tools to promote longitudinal engagement, interactive decision-making, and dynamic governance. Learning from European initiatives piloting dynamic IC for biobanking and SC research, this Perspective explores the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic IC and governance for SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":21885,"journal":{"name":"Stem Cell Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic governance: A new era for consent for stem cell research.\",\"authors\":\"Rosario Isasi, Heidi B Bentzen, Morris Fabbri, Antonie Fuhr, Joel C Glover, Nancy Mah, Deborah Mascalzoni, Sabine Mueller, Stefanie Seltmann, Andreas Kurtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Governance infrastructures streamline scientific and ethical provenance verification of human pluripotent stem cell (SC) lines. Yet, scientific developments (e.g., SC-derived embryo models, organoids) challenge research governance approaches to stored biospecimens, questioning the validity of informed consent (IC) models. Likewise, e-health platforms are driving major transformations in data processing, prompting a reappraisal of IC. Given these developments, participatory research platforms are identified as effective tools to promote longitudinal engagement, interactive decision-making, and dynamic governance. Learning from European initiatives piloting dynamic IC for biobanking and SC research, this Perspective explores the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic IC and governance for SC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem Cell Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411296/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem Cell Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem Cell Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.07.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治理基础设施简化了人类多能干细胞(SC)系的科学和伦理出处验证。然而,科学的发展(如多能干细胞衍生的胚胎模型、器官)对存储生物样本的研究治理方法提出了挑战,质疑知情同意(IC)模式的有效性。同样,电子健康平台正在推动数据处理的重大变革,促使人们重新评估知情同意模式。鉴于这些发展,参与式研究平台被认为是促进纵向参与、互动决策和动态管理的有效工具。本视角从欧洲为生物银行和自然科学研究试行动态集成电路的举措中汲取经验,探讨了为自然科学实施动态集成电路和治理的益处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic governance: A new era for consent for stem cell research.

Governance infrastructures streamline scientific and ethical provenance verification of human pluripotent stem cell (SC) lines. Yet, scientific developments (e.g., SC-derived embryo models, organoids) challenge research governance approaches to stored biospecimens, questioning the validity of informed consent (IC) models. Likewise, e-health platforms are driving major transformations in data processing, prompting a reappraisal of IC. Given these developments, participatory research platforms are identified as effective tools to promote longitudinal engagement, interactive decision-making, and dynamic governance. Learning from European initiatives piloting dynamic IC for biobanking and SC research, this Perspective explores the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic IC and governance for SC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stem Cell Reports
Stem Cell Reports CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-CELL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
200
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Stem Cell Reports publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research presenting conceptual or practical advances across the breadth of stem cell research and its applications to medicine. Our particular focus on shorter, single-point articles, timely publication, strong editorial decision-making and scientific input by leaders in the field and a "scoop protection" mechanism are reasons to submit your best papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信