Suneeta Monga, Sorina Andrei, Rebecka C Quinn, Valeria Khudiakova, Riddhi Desai, Abiramy Srirangan, Sneha Patel, Peter Szatmari, Nancy J Butcher, Karolin R Krause, Darren B Courtney, Martin Offringa, Ellen B M Elsman
{"title":"系统性综述:用于测量青少年抑郁症患者抑郁症状严重程度的 \"患者报告结果测量法 \"的测量特性。","authors":"Suneeta Monga, Sorina Andrei, Rebecka C Quinn, Valeria Khudiakova, Riddhi Desai, Abiramy Srirangan, Sneha Patel, Peter Szatmari, Nancy J Butcher, Karolin R Krause, Darren B Courtney, Martin Offringa, Ellen B M Elsman","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of 12 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression. Depression symptom severity was chosen as the outcome of focus given its importance as an outcome to measure in adolescents with depression across clinical trials and/or care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from year of inception up to December 7<sup>th</sup>, 2023. Study appraisal (i.e., risk of bias), evaluation of measurement properties, and evidence synthesis followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Included studies evaluated at least one of nine measurement properties as detailed in the COSMIN taxonomy within a reported sample or subgroup of youth 12-24 years, with at least 40% meeting criteria for any depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15,560 records identified, 31 studies for seven PROMs were included in the COSMIN appraisal. Although several PROMs have the potential to accurately measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression, at this time none of the PROMs can be recommended for use without further evaluative work. High-quality evidence was generally lacking, largely due to few or inconsistent findings, small sample sizes, and other methodological concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review of the measurement properties of 12 PROMs used to measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression found that none of the PROMs can be recommended for use until further evaluative work is conducted. Clinicians and researchers should proceed with caution when using these PROMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review: Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Measure Depression Symptom Severity in Adolescents With Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Suneeta Monga, Sorina Andrei, Rebecka C Quinn, Valeria Khudiakova, Riddhi Desai, Abiramy Srirangan, Sneha Patel, Peter Szatmari, Nancy J Butcher, Karolin R Krause, Darren B Courtney, Martin Offringa, Ellen B M Elsman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of 12 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression. Depression symptom severity was chosen as the outcome of focus given its importance as an outcome to measure in adolescents with depression across clinical trials and/or care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from year of inception up to December 7<sup>th</sup>, 2023. Study appraisal (i.e., risk of bias), evaluation of measurement properties, and evidence synthesis followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Included studies evaluated at least one of nine measurement properties as detailed in the COSMIN taxonomy within a reported sample or subgroup of youth 12-24 years, with at least 40% meeting criteria for any depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 15,560 records identified, 31 studies for seven PROMs were included in the COSMIN appraisal. Although several PROMs have the potential to accurately measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression, at this time none of the PROMs can be recommended for use without further evaluative work. High-quality evidence was generally lacking, largely due to few or inconsistent findings, small sample sizes, and other methodological concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review of the measurement properties of 12 PROMs used to measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression found that none of the PROMs can be recommended for use until further evaluative work is conducted. Clinicians and researchers should proceed with caution when using these PROMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2024.06.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic Review: Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used to Measure Depression Symptom Severity in Adolescents With Depression.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the measurement properties of 12 patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression. Depression symptom severity was chosen as the outcome of focus given its importance as an outcome to measure in adolescents with depression across clinical trials and/or care.
Method: MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched from year of inception up to December 7th, 2023. Study appraisal (i.e., risk of bias), evaluation of measurement properties, and evidence synthesis followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Included studies evaluated at least one of nine measurement properties as detailed in the COSMIN taxonomy within a reported sample or subgroup of youth 12-24 years, with at least 40% meeting criteria for any depressive disorder.
Results: Of the 15,560 records identified, 31 studies for seven PROMs were included in the COSMIN appraisal. Although several PROMs have the potential to accurately measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression, at this time none of the PROMs can be recommended for use without further evaluative work. High-quality evidence was generally lacking, largely due to few or inconsistent findings, small sample sizes, and other methodological concerns.
Conclusion: This systematic review of the measurement properties of 12 PROMs used to measure depression symptom severity in adolescents with depression found that none of the PROMs can be recommended for use until further evaluative work is conducted. Clinicians and researchers should proceed with caution when using these PROMs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families.
We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings.
In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health.
At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.