在外伤人群中检查未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)的发病率。

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Barrett Schwartz, Vincent Nguyen, Michael Barats, Mustafa Motiwala, Sean Himel, David M Weatherford, Violiza Inoa-Acosta, Nitin Goyal, Nickalus R Khan, Daniel Hoit, Lucas Elijovich, Adam S Arthur, Christopher Nickele
{"title":"在外伤人群中检查未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)的发病率。","authors":"Barrett Schwartz, Vincent Nguyen, Michael Barats, Mustafa Motiwala, Sean Himel, David M Weatherford, Violiza Inoa-Acosta, Nitin Goyal, Nickalus R Khan, Daniel Hoit, Lucas Elijovich, Adam S Arthur, Christopher Nickele","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous data on the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) vary widely, and studies based on these data are plagued with unintentional bias. Accurate prevalence data are paramount for any physician who counsels patients with intracranial aneurysms on rupture risk and treatment. We therefore sought to determine a more accurate number for the true prevalence of UIAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and tertiary care hospital in an urban setting between 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients admitted with blunt trauma. Exclusion criteria included not having a head and neck CTA performed and read by an attending radiologist. All head and neck CTA radiology reads were reviewed for incidentally discovered UIAs. Subgroup analysis was performed by age group, race, and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5978 out of 8999 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 58 total aneurysms were identified giving an overall prevalence of 0.9%. Subgroup analysis was performed for all age groups, genders, and racial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall aneurysm prevalence was found to be 0.9% in this sample. This rate is lower than rates previously cited in the literature and those quoted in local practice. This finding has significant implications when attempting to understand average rupture risk. Further studies are needed to power more subgroup analyses to use a more personalized approach to understanding an individual's risk of rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1066-1070"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) examined in the trauma population.\",\"authors\":\"Barrett Schwartz, Vincent Nguyen, Michael Barats, Mustafa Motiwala, Sean Himel, David M Weatherford, Violiza Inoa-Acosta, Nitin Goyal, Nickalus R Khan, Daniel Hoit, Lucas Elijovich, Adam S Arthur, Christopher Nickele\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnis-2024-022154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous data on the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) vary widely, and studies based on these data are plagued with unintentional bias. Accurate prevalence data are paramount for any physician who counsels patients with intracranial aneurysms on rupture risk and treatment. We therefore sought to determine a more accurate number for the true prevalence of UIAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and tertiary care hospital in an urban setting between 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients admitted with blunt trauma. Exclusion criteria included not having a head and neck CTA performed and read by an attending radiologist. All head and neck CTA radiology reads were reviewed for incidentally discovered UIAs. Subgroup analysis was performed by age group, race, and gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5978 out of 8999 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 58 total aneurysms were identified giving an overall prevalence of 0.9%. Subgroup analysis was performed for all age groups, genders, and racial groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall aneurysm prevalence was found to be 0.9% in this sample. This rate is lower than rates previously cited in the literature and those quoted in local practice. This finding has significant implications when attempting to understand average rupture risk. Further studies are needed to power more subgroup analyses to use a more personalized approach to understanding an individual's risk of rupture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1066-1070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022154\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以往关于未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)发病率的数据差异很大,基于这些数据的研究存在无意偏差。对于向颅内动脉瘤患者提供破裂风险和治疗建议的医生来说,准确的患病率数据至关重要。因此,我们试图确定一个更准确的 UIA 真实发病率数字:方法:2019 年至 2020 年期间,我们在城市环境中的一级创伤中心和三级医院进行了一次回顾性病历审查。纳入标准包括因钝性创伤入院的患者。排除标准包括未进行头颈部CTA检查并由放射科主治医生阅片的患者。对所有头颈部CTA放射学读片进行审查,以发现偶然发现的UIA。按年龄组、种族和性别进行分组分析:在 8999 名患者中,共有 5978 名符合纳入标准,54 名患者共发现 58 个动脉瘤,总发病率为 0.9%。对所有年龄组、性别和种族进行了分组分析:结论:在该样本中,动脉瘤的总发病率为 0.9%。这一比率低于之前文献中引用的比率和当地实践中引用的比率。在试图了解平均破裂风险时,这一发现具有重要意义。还需要进一步的研究来进行更多的亚组分析,以采用更个性化的方法来了解个人的破裂风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) examined in the trauma population.

Background: Previous data on the prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) vary widely, and studies based on these data are plagued with unintentional bias. Accurate prevalence data are paramount for any physician who counsels patients with intracranial aneurysms on rupture risk and treatment. We therefore sought to determine a more accurate number for the true prevalence of UIAs.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center and tertiary care hospital in an urban setting between 2019 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients admitted with blunt trauma. Exclusion criteria included not having a head and neck CTA performed and read by an attending radiologist. All head and neck CTA radiology reads were reviewed for incidentally discovered UIAs. Subgroup analysis was performed by age group, race, and gender.

Results: A total of 5978 out of 8999 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 54 patients with 58 total aneurysms were identified giving an overall prevalence of 0.9%. Subgroup analysis was performed for all age groups, genders, and racial groups.

Conclusion: The overall aneurysm prevalence was found to be 0.9% in this sample. This rate is lower than rates previously cited in the literature and those quoted in local practice. This finding has significant implications when attempting to understand average rupture risk. Further studies are needed to power more subgroup analyses to use a more personalized approach to understanding an individual's risk of rupture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信