基于机器学习的二尖瓣反流严重程度量化多参数自动分级法

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Anita Sadeghpour, Zhubo Jiang, Yoran M Hummel, Matthew Frost, Carolyn S P Lam, Sanjiv J Shah, Lars H Lund, Gregg W Stone, Madhav Swaminathan, Neil J Weissman, Federico M Asch
{"title":"基于机器学习的二尖瓣反流严重程度量化多参数自动分级法","authors":"Anita Sadeghpour, Zhubo Jiang, Yoran M Hummel, Matthew Frost, Carolyn S P Lam, Sanjiv J Shah, Lars H Lund, Gregg W Stone, Madhav Swaminathan, Neil J Weissman, Federico M Asch","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the high prevalence of mitral regurgitation (MR) and the highly subjective, variable MR severity reporting, an automated tool that could screen patients for clinically significant MR (≥ moderate) would streamline the diagnostic/therapeutic pathways and ultimately improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aimed to develop and validate a fully automated machine learning (ML)-based echocardiography workflow for grading MR severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ML algorithms were trained on echocardiograms from 2 observational cohorts and validated in patients from 2 additional independent studies. Multiparametric echocardiography core laboratory MR assessment served as ground truth. The machine was trained to measure 16 MR-related parameters. Multiple ML models were developed to find the optimal parameters and preferred ML model for MR severity grading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preferred ML model used 9 parameters. Image analysis was feasible in 99.3% of cases and took 80 ± 5 seconds per case. The accuracy for grading MR severity (none to severe) was 0.80, and for significant (moderate or severe) vs nonsignificant MR was 0.97 with a sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.98. The model performed similarly in cases of eccentric and central MR. Patients graded as having severe MR had higher 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 5.20 [95% CI: 1.24-21.9]; P = 0.025 compared with mild).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An automated multiparametric ML model for grading MR severity is feasible, fast, highly accurate, and predicts 1-year mortality. Its implementation in clinical practice could improve patient care by facilitating referral to specialized clinics and access to evidence-based therapies while improving quality and efficiency in the echocardiography laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":14767,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Automated Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Multiparametric Approach for Mitral Regurgitation Severity Grading.\",\"authors\":\"Anita Sadeghpour, Zhubo Jiang, Yoran M Hummel, Matthew Frost, Carolyn S P Lam, Sanjiv J Shah, Lars H Lund, Gregg W Stone, Madhav Swaminathan, Neil J Weissman, Federico M Asch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the high prevalence of mitral regurgitation (MR) and the highly subjective, variable MR severity reporting, an automated tool that could screen patients for clinically significant MR (≥ moderate) would streamline the diagnostic/therapeutic pathways and ultimately improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The authors aimed to develop and validate a fully automated machine learning (ML)-based echocardiography workflow for grading MR severity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ML algorithms were trained on echocardiograms from 2 observational cohorts and validated in patients from 2 additional independent studies. Multiparametric echocardiography core laboratory MR assessment served as ground truth. The machine was trained to measure 16 MR-related parameters. Multiple ML models were developed to find the optimal parameters and preferred ML model for MR severity grading.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preferred ML model used 9 parameters. Image analysis was feasible in 99.3% of cases and took 80 ± 5 seconds per case. The accuracy for grading MR severity (none to severe) was 0.80, and for significant (moderate or severe) vs nonsignificant MR was 0.97 with a sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.98. The model performed similarly in cases of eccentric and central MR. Patients graded as having severe MR had higher 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 5.20 [95% CI: 1.24-21.9]; P = 0.025 compared with mild).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An automated multiparametric ML model for grading MR severity is feasible, fast, highly accurate, and predicts 1-year mortality. Its implementation in clinical practice could improve patient care by facilitating referral to specialized clinics and access to evidence-based therapies while improving quality and efficiency in the echocardiography laboratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.06.011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2024.06.011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:考虑到二尖瓣反流(MR)的高发病率以及高度主观、多变的MR严重程度报告,一种能够筛查具有临床意义的MR(≥中度)患者的自动化工具将简化诊断/治疗路径,并最终改善患者预后:作者旨在开发并验证一种基于机器学习(ML)的全自动超声心动图工作流程,用于对 MR 严重程度进行分级:方法:对来自 2 个观察性队列的超声心动图进行了 ML 算法训练,并在另外 2 项独立研究的患者中进行了验证。多参数超声心动图核心实验室的 MR 评估作为基本真相。训练机器测量 16 个 MR 相关参数。开发了多个 ML 模型,以找到 MR 严重程度分级的最佳参数和首选 ML 模型:结果:首选的 ML 模型使用了 9 个参数。99.3%的病例可以进行图像分析,每个病例用时80±5秒。MR 严重程度分级(无到重度)的准确率为 0.80,显著(中度或重度)与非显著 MR 的准确率为 0.97,灵敏度为 0.96,特异性为 0.98。该模型在偏心性和中心性 MR 病例中的表现类似。被分级为重度 MR 的患者 1 年死亡率较高(调整后 HR:5.20 [95% CI:1.24-21.9];与轻度相比,P = 0.025):用于 MR 严重程度分级的自动多参数 ML 模型可行、快速、高度准确,并能预测 1 年死亡率。在临床实践中应用该模型可改善患者护理,方便患者转诊至专科门诊和获得循证疗法,同时提高超声心动图室的质量和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Automated Machine Learning-Based Quantitative Multiparametric Approach for Mitral Regurgitation Severity Grading.

Background: Considering the high prevalence of mitral regurgitation (MR) and the highly subjective, variable MR severity reporting, an automated tool that could screen patients for clinically significant MR (≥ moderate) would streamline the diagnostic/therapeutic pathways and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Objectives: The authors aimed to develop and validate a fully automated machine learning (ML)-based echocardiography workflow for grading MR severity.

Methods: ML algorithms were trained on echocardiograms from 2 observational cohorts and validated in patients from 2 additional independent studies. Multiparametric echocardiography core laboratory MR assessment served as ground truth. The machine was trained to measure 16 MR-related parameters. Multiple ML models were developed to find the optimal parameters and preferred ML model for MR severity grading.

Results: The preferred ML model used 9 parameters. Image analysis was feasible in 99.3% of cases and took 80 ± 5 seconds per case. The accuracy for grading MR severity (none to severe) was 0.80, and for significant (moderate or severe) vs nonsignificant MR was 0.97 with a sensitivity of 0.96 and specificity of 0.98. The model performed similarly in cases of eccentric and central MR. Patients graded as having severe MR had higher 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 5.20 [95% CI: 1.24-21.9]; P = 0.025 compared with mild).

Conclusions: An automated multiparametric ML model for grading MR severity is feasible, fast, highly accurate, and predicts 1-year mortality. Its implementation in clinical practice could improve patient care by facilitating referral to specialized clinics and access to evidence-based therapies while improving quality and efficiency in the echocardiography laboratory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, part of the prestigious Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) family, offers readers a comprehensive perspective on all aspects of cardiovascular imaging. This specialist journal covers original clinical research on both non-invasive and invasive imaging techniques, including echocardiography, CT, CMR, nuclear, optical imaging, and cine-angiography. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging highlights advances in basic science and molecular imaging that are expected to significantly impact clinical practice in the next decade. This influence encompasses improvements in diagnostic performance, enhanced understanding of the pathogenetic basis of diseases, and advancements in therapy. In addition to cutting-edge research,the content of JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging emphasizes practical aspects for the practicing cardiologist, including advocacy and practice management.The journal also features state-of-the-art reviews, ensuring a well-rounded and insightful resource for professionals in the field of cardiovascular imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信