壶铃综合训练与高强度功能训练的运动后代谢反应。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05579-z
Robert E Sturdy, Todd A Astorino
{"title":"壶铃综合训练与高强度功能训练的运动后代谢反应。","authors":"Robert E Sturdy, Todd A Astorino","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05579-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the magnitude of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) between kettlebell complexes (KC) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) and identified predictors of the EPOC response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Active men (n = 11) and women (n = 10) (age 25 ± 6 yr) initially completed testing of resting energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max), followed by lower and upper-body muscle endurance testing. On two subsequent days separated by ≥ 48 h, participants completed KC requiring 6 sets of kettlebell exercises (pushups, deadlifts, goblet squats, rows, and swings) with 60 s recovery between sets, and HIFT requiring 6 sets of bodyweight exercises (mountain climbers, jump squats, pushups, and air squats) with 60 s recovery. During exercise, gas exchange data and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were acquired and post-exercise, EPOC was assessed for 60 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed no difference in EPOC (10.7 ± 4.5 vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 L, p = 0.37), and VO<sub>2</sub> and ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>) were significantly elevated for 30 and 60 min post-exercise in response to KC and HIFT. For KC and HIFT, HRmean and post-exercise BLa (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.37) and post-exercise BLa and V<sub>E</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52) explained the greatest shared variance of EPOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KC and HIFT elicit similar EPOC and elevation in VO<sub>2</sub> which is sustained for 30-60 min post-exercise, leading to 55 extra calories expended. Results show no association between aerobic fitness and EPOC, although significant associations were revealed for mean HR as well as post-exercise V<sub>E</sub> and BLa.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-exercise metabolic response to kettlebell complexes vs. high intensity functional training.\",\"authors\":\"Robert E Sturdy, Todd A Astorino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-024-05579-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the magnitude of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) between kettlebell complexes (KC) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) and identified predictors of the EPOC response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Active men (n = 11) and women (n = 10) (age 25 ± 6 yr) initially completed testing of resting energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max), followed by lower and upper-body muscle endurance testing. On two subsequent days separated by ≥ 48 h, participants completed KC requiring 6 sets of kettlebell exercises (pushups, deadlifts, goblet squats, rows, and swings) with 60 s recovery between sets, and HIFT requiring 6 sets of bodyweight exercises (mountain climbers, jump squats, pushups, and air squats) with 60 s recovery. During exercise, gas exchange data and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were acquired and post-exercise, EPOC was assessed for 60 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed no difference in EPOC (10.7 ± 4.5 vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 L, p = 0.37), and VO<sub>2</sub> and ventilation (V<sub>E</sub>) were significantly elevated for 30 and 60 min post-exercise in response to KC and HIFT. For KC and HIFT, HRmean and post-exercise BLa (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.37) and post-exercise BLa and V<sub>E</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.52) explained the greatest shared variance of EPOC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>KC and HIFT elicit similar EPOC and elevation in VO<sub>2</sub> which is sustained for 30-60 min post-exercise, leading to 55 extra calories expended. Results show no association between aerobic fitness and EPOC, although significant associations were revealed for mean HR as well as post-exercise V<sub>E</sub> and BLa.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05579-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05579-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了壶铃复合训练(KC)和高强度功能训练(HIFT)的运动后超量耗氧量(EPOC)的大小,并确定了EPOC反应的预测因素:活跃的男性(n = 11)和女性(n = 10)(年龄为 25 ± 6 岁)首先完成静息能量消耗和最大摄氧量(VO2max)测试,然后进行上下肢肌肉耐力测试。在随后相隔≥ 48 小时的两天里,参与者完成了 KC 和 HIFT 测试,前者要求进行 6 组壶铃运动(俯卧撑、负重举重、高脚杯深蹲、划船和挥杆),每组之间恢复 60 秒;后者要求进行 6 组负重运动(爬山、跳蹲、俯卧撑和空中深蹲),每组之间恢复 60 秒。运动过程中采集气体交换数据和血液乳酸浓度(BLa),运动后 60 分钟评估 EPOC:结果表明,EPOC(10.7 ± 4.5 与 11.6 ± 2.7 L,p = 0.37)与 KC 和 HIFT 无差异,运动后 30 分钟和 60 分钟的 VO2 和通气量(VE)显著增加。对于 KC 和 HIFT,心率平均值和运动后 BLa(R2 = 0.37)以及运动后 BLa 和 VE(R2 = 0.52)解释了 EPOC 的最大共享方差:结论:KC 和 HIFT 可引起相似的 EPOC 和 VO2 升高,这种升高可在运动后持续 30-60 分钟,从而额外消耗 55 卡路里。结果显示,有氧体能与 EPOC 之间没有关联,但平均心率以及运动后 VE 和 BLa 之间存在显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Post-exercise metabolic response to kettlebell complexes vs. high intensity functional training.

Post-exercise metabolic response to kettlebell complexes vs. high intensity functional training.

Purpose: This study compared the magnitude of excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) between kettlebell complexes (KC) and high-intensity functional training (HIFT) and identified predictors of the EPOC response.

Methods: Active men (n = 11) and women (n = 10) (age 25 ± 6 yr) initially completed testing of resting energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), followed by lower and upper-body muscle endurance testing. On two subsequent days separated by ≥ 48 h, participants completed KC requiring 6 sets of kettlebell exercises (pushups, deadlifts, goblet squats, rows, and swings) with 60 s recovery between sets, and HIFT requiring 6 sets of bodyweight exercises (mountain climbers, jump squats, pushups, and air squats) with 60 s recovery. During exercise, gas exchange data and blood lactate concentration (BLa) were acquired and post-exercise, EPOC was assessed for 60 min.

Results: Results showed no difference in EPOC (10.7 ± 4.5 vs. 11.6 ± 2.7 L, p = 0.37), and VO2 and ventilation (VE) were significantly elevated for 30 and 60 min post-exercise in response to KC and HIFT. For KC and HIFT, HRmean and post-exercise BLa (R2 = 0.37) and post-exercise BLa and VE (R2 = 0.52) explained the greatest shared variance of EPOC.

Conclusion: KC and HIFT elicit similar EPOC and elevation in VO2 which is sustained for 30-60 min post-exercise, leading to 55 extra calories expended. Results show no association between aerobic fitness and EPOC, although significant associations were revealed for mean HR as well as post-exercise VE and BLa.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信