肿瘤分级和孕酮受体状态在预测高基因组风险乳腺癌化疗获益方面的作用。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749
Ke Liu, Gui-Ping Chen, Xue-Qin Chen, San-Gang Wu
{"title":"肿瘤分级和孕酮受体状态在预测高基因组风险乳腺癌化疗获益方面的作用。","authors":"Ke Liu, Gui-Ping Chen, Xue-Qin Chen, San-Gang Wu","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and overall survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all <i>p</i> ≥ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor grade and progesterone receptor status in predicting benefit of chemotherapy in high genomic risk breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ke Liu, Gui-Ping Chen, Xue-Qin Chen, San-Gang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and overall survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all <i>p</i> ≥ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:并非所有符合条件的乳腺癌(BC)患者都能负担得起昂贵的21基因复发评分(RS)检测。本研究旨在确定与高风险RS相关的临床病理因素,并考察这些因素是否与化疗的获益相关:从监测、流行病学和最终结果 Oncotype DX 数据库中识别出被诊断为早期 BC、结节阴性和雌激素受体阳性的患者:我们共纳入了 74 605 名患者。结果:我们纳入了 74 605 名患者,其中分级(p p = 0.010)和总生存率(p p ≥ 0.05)较高的患者:我们的研究有助于完善 RS 检测的患者选择,考虑到其经济影响,这一点至关重要。然而,21 基因 RS 仍是治疗决策的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumor grade and progesterone receptor status in predicting benefit of chemotherapy in high genomic risk breast cancer.

Background: Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy.

Research design and methods: Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database.

Result: We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (p < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (p < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.010) and overall survival (p < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all p ≥ 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信