在现实世界的众包服务中,快递员对送货任务的选择与观察到的寄件人-快递员偏好差异

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Hui Shen, Jane Lin
{"title":"在现实世界的众包服务中,快递员对送货任务的选择与观察到的寄件人-快递员偏好差异","authors":"Hui Shen, Jane Lin","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10528-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a crowdshipping service is not well understood in the literature. Thus the objective of this study is to empirically investigate the crowdshipping (CS) couriers’ bidding preferences for delivery gigs, and how the gig features impact the gig delivery status of a real-world CS service in the United States. The delivery records were made available between 2015 and 2018. A descriptive analysis reveals that there exist significant preference discrepancies between the senders and the couriers in terms of package size, delivery time window, delivery distance, and delivery fee. Therefore, four features to capture the above discrepancy are specifically created from the data in predicting <i>the bidding level</i> and <i>the delivery status</i>. The bidding level which is measured by the number of bids received per gig is classified into low, medium, and high bidding levels to reflect the couriers’ preferences for the delivery gigs. The delivery status, labeled as delivered or undelivered, is affected by the couriers’ eventual choice of the delivery gigs. Five popular machine learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine, and Bayesian Network are applied to the predictions. Among them, the XGBoost is found to perform the best. Furthermore, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values are introduced to explain and visualize how each feature influences the dependent variable (prediction target). The SHAP values provide an effective visualization and interpretability of the feature impact values and importance rankings, much like the coefficients of the traditional econometric based logit model. The paper further demonstrates that the ML models and the logit models produce consistent feature influences. Overall, the couriers are generally interested in the delivery gigs of extra-large and huge package sizes, medium to long delivery distance, insured packages, and flexible delivery time window. Discrepancy related features significantly influence couriers’ bidding behavior as expected. The study also reveals that gigs that receive a high number of bids do not translate into their eventual successful deliveries. Finally, policy and practical implications for improving the CS service particularly through pricing strategies are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a real-world crowdshipping service with observed sender-courier preference discrepancy\",\"authors\":\"Hui Shen, Jane Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11116-024-10528-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a crowdshipping service is not well understood in the literature. Thus the objective of this study is to empirically investigate the crowdshipping (CS) couriers’ bidding preferences for delivery gigs, and how the gig features impact the gig delivery status of a real-world CS service in the United States. The delivery records were made available between 2015 and 2018. A descriptive analysis reveals that there exist significant preference discrepancies between the senders and the couriers in terms of package size, delivery time window, delivery distance, and delivery fee. Therefore, four features to capture the above discrepancy are specifically created from the data in predicting <i>the bidding level</i> and <i>the delivery status</i>. The bidding level which is measured by the number of bids received per gig is classified into low, medium, and high bidding levels to reflect the couriers’ preferences for the delivery gigs. The delivery status, labeled as delivered or undelivered, is affected by the couriers’ eventual choice of the delivery gigs. Five popular machine learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine, and Bayesian Network are applied to the predictions. Among them, the XGBoost is found to perform the best. Furthermore, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values are introduced to explain and visualize how each feature influences the dependent variable (prediction target). The SHAP values provide an effective visualization and interpretability of the feature impact values and importance rankings, much like the coefficients of the traditional econometric based logit model. The paper further demonstrates that the ML models and the logit models produce consistent feature influences. Overall, the couriers are generally interested in the delivery gigs of extra-large and huge package sizes, medium to long delivery distance, insured packages, and flexible delivery time window. Discrepancy related features significantly influence couriers’ bidding behavior as expected. The study also reveals that gigs that receive a high number of bids do not translate into their eventual successful deliveries. Finally, policy and practical implications for improving the CS service particularly through pricing strategies are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10528-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10528-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献中对快递员在众包服务中选择送货任务的情况并不十分了解。因此,本研究的目的是实证调查众包快递(CS)快递员对配送演出的竞标偏好,以及演出特点如何影响美国真实世界中CS服务的演出交付状态。送货记录是在 2015 年至 2018 年期间提供的。描述性分析表明,发件人和快递员在包裹大小、投递时间窗口、投递距离和投递费用方面存在明显的偏好差异。因此,在预测投标水平和投递状态时,我们从数据中专门创建了四个特征来捕捉上述差异。竞价水平是以每件货物收到的竞价数量来衡量的,分为低、中、高竞价水平,以反映快递员对送货货物的偏好。投递状态(标记为已投递或未投递)受快递员最终选择的投递服务的影响。预测采用了五种流行的机器学习(ML)方法,即随机森林决策树、人工神经网络、极梯度提升(XGBoost)、支持向量机和贝叶斯网络。其中,XGBoost 的性能最佳。此外,还引入了 Shapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)值来解释和可视化每个特征如何影响因变量(预测目标)。SHAP 值为特征影响值和重要性排名提供了有效的可视化和可解释性,就像基于传统计量经济学的 logit 模型的系数一样。本文进一步证明,ML 模型和 logit 模型产生的特征影响是一致的。总体而言,快递员普遍对超大和巨型包裹、中长距离投递、投保包裹和灵活的投递时间窗口等投递服务感兴趣。正如预期的那样,与差异相关的特征会对快递员的竞价行为产生重大影响。研究还揭示出,获得大量竞标的任务并不能转化为最终的成功交付。最后,我们还讨论了通过定价策略改善 CS 服务的政策和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a real-world crowdshipping service with observed sender-courier preference discrepancy

A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a real-world crowdshipping service with observed sender-courier preference discrepancy

A courier’s choice for delivery gigs in a crowdshipping service is not well understood in the literature. Thus the objective of this study is to empirically investigate the crowdshipping (CS) couriers’ bidding preferences for delivery gigs, and how the gig features impact the gig delivery status of a real-world CS service in the United States. The delivery records were made available between 2015 and 2018. A descriptive analysis reveals that there exist significant preference discrepancies between the senders and the couriers in terms of package size, delivery time window, delivery distance, and delivery fee. Therefore, four features to capture the above discrepancy are specifically created from the data in predicting the bidding level and the delivery status. The bidding level which is measured by the number of bids received per gig is classified into low, medium, and high bidding levels to reflect the couriers’ preferences for the delivery gigs. The delivery status, labeled as delivered or undelivered, is affected by the couriers’ eventual choice of the delivery gigs. Five popular machine learning (ML) methods, namely Random Forest Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Network, eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine, and Bayesian Network are applied to the predictions. Among them, the XGBoost is found to perform the best. Furthermore, the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values are introduced to explain and visualize how each feature influences the dependent variable (prediction target). The SHAP values provide an effective visualization and interpretability of the feature impact values and importance rankings, much like the coefficients of the traditional econometric based logit model. The paper further demonstrates that the ML models and the logit models produce consistent feature influences. Overall, the couriers are generally interested in the delivery gigs of extra-large and huge package sizes, medium to long delivery distance, insured packages, and flexible delivery time window. Discrepancy related features significantly influence couriers’ bidding behavior as expected. The study also reveals that gigs that receive a high number of bids do not translate into their eventual successful deliveries. Finally, policy and practical implications for improving the CS service particularly through pricing strategies are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信