与哮喘相比,特应性皮炎患者的杜比鲁单抗眼部不良反应发生率更高:日常实践分析

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Anne R. Schlösser, Lotte Bult, John C. Thelen, Alberta A. H. J. Thiadens, Renske Schappin, Tamar E. C. Nijsten, Johannes C. C. M. in 't Veen, Gerrit J. Braunstahl, DirkJan Hijnen
{"title":"与哮喘相比,特应性皮炎患者的杜比鲁单抗眼部不良反应发生率更高:日常实践分析","authors":"Anne R. Schlösser,&nbsp;Lotte Bult,&nbsp;John C. Thelen,&nbsp;Alberta A. H. J. Thiadens,&nbsp;Renske Schappin,&nbsp;Tamar E. C. Nijsten,&nbsp;Johannes C. C. M. in 't Veen,&nbsp;Gerrit J. Braunstahl,&nbsp;DirkJan Hijnen","doi":"10.1002/clt2.12386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dupilumab has been shown to be an effective treatment in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and severe asthma (SA). However, comparative real-world analyses of adverse events (AE), particularly dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD), are lacking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This is the first real-world study to provide insight into the prevalence of AEs associated with dupilumab in AD compared with SA. Secondary objectives were to assess the prevalence, onset and therapeutic strategies of DAOSD and evaluate dupilumab discontinuation rates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from two daily practice registries including AD and SA patients receiving dupilumab treatment were analyzed. Adverse events, including DAOSD, were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 322 AD and 148 SA patients were included. Headaches (23.6%), injection site reactions (10.1%), and influenza-like symptoms (13.5%) were more prevalent in SA patients. Interestingly, ocular AEs were significantly more prevalent in AD patients (62.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), including conjunctivitis (17.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.004). 88% AD and 47% SA patients with ocular AEs received one or more ophthalmic treatment(s). Additionally, 20% of AD and 17.6% of SA patients discontinued dupilumab treatment due to ocular AEs, while only 65% of these AD and none of these SA patients were referred to an ophthalmologist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The higher incidence of DAOSD in AD patients compared with SA patients in this real-world study highlights the importance of physician awareness, especially when prescribing dupilumab to AD patients. Conversely, the findings of this study help alleviate potential concerns about ocular AEs in patients with SA who do not have comorbid AD. Furthermore, the effective management of most ocular AEs with ophthalmic treatments suggests favorable tolerability of dupilumab in daily practice, and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to proactively manage ocular AEs before discontinuing dupilumab.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.12386","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher prevalence of dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events in atopic dermatitis compared to asthma: A daily practice analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anne R. Schlösser,&nbsp;Lotte Bult,&nbsp;John C. Thelen,&nbsp;Alberta A. H. J. Thiadens,&nbsp;Renske Schappin,&nbsp;Tamar E. C. Nijsten,&nbsp;Johannes C. C. M. in 't Veen,&nbsp;Gerrit J. Braunstahl,&nbsp;DirkJan Hijnen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clt2.12386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dupilumab has been shown to be an effective treatment in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and severe asthma (SA). However, comparative real-world analyses of adverse events (AE), particularly dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD), are lacking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This is the first real-world study to provide insight into the prevalence of AEs associated with dupilumab in AD compared with SA. Secondary objectives were to assess the prevalence, onset and therapeutic strategies of DAOSD and evaluate dupilumab discontinuation rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from two daily practice registries including AD and SA patients receiving dupilumab treatment were analyzed. Adverse events, including DAOSD, were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 322 AD and 148 SA patients were included. Headaches (23.6%), injection site reactions (10.1%), and influenza-like symptoms (13.5%) were more prevalent in SA patients. Interestingly, ocular AEs were significantly more prevalent in AD patients (62.1%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), including conjunctivitis (17.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.004). 88% AD and 47% SA patients with ocular AEs received one or more ophthalmic treatment(s). Additionally, 20% of AD and 17.6% of SA patients discontinued dupilumab treatment due to ocular AEs, while only 65% of these AD and none of these SA patients were referred to an ophthalmologist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The higher incidence of DAOSD in AD patients compared with SA patients in this real-world study highlights the importance of physician awareness, especially when prescribing dupilumab to AD patients. Conversely, the findings of this study help alleviate potential concerns about ocular AEs in patients with SA who do not have comorbid AD. Furthermore, the effective management of most ocular AEs with ophthalmic treatments suggests favorable tolerability of dupilumab in daily practice, and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to proactively manage ocular AEs before discontinuing dupilumab.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Allergy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clt2.12386\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.12386\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.12386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 杜匹单抗已被证明是治疗中重度特应性皮炎(AD)和重症哮喘(SA)的有效药物。然而,目前还缺乏对不良事件(AE),尤其是杜匹单抗相关眼表疾病(DAOSD)的真实世界对比分析。 目的 这是第一项真实世界研究,旨在深入了解与杜比单抗相关的不良反应在 AD 和 SA 中的发生率。次要目标是评估DAOSD的患病率、发病率和治疗策略,并评估杜必鲁单抗的停药率。 方法 分析了来自两个日常实践登记处的数据,包括接受杜比单抗治疗的 AD 和 SA 患者。对包括DAOSD在内的不良事件进行了评估。 结果 共纳入 322 例 AD 和 148 例 SA 患者。在SA患者中,头痛(23.6%)、注射部位反应(10.1%)和流感样症状(13.5%)更为普遍。有趣的是,眼部 AEs 在 AD 患者中的发生率明显更高(62.1%,p < 0.001),包括结膜炎(17.1%,p = 0.004)。88%的 AD 和 47% 的 SA 眼部 AE 患者接受了一种或多种眼科治疗。此外,20%的AD和17.6%的SA患者因眼部AE停止了dupilumab治疗,而这些AD患者中只有65%被转诊到眼科医生处,SA患者中没有人被转诊到眼科医生处。 结论 在这项真实世界研究中,AD 患者的 DAOSD 发生率高于 SA 患者,这凸显了医生意识的重要性,尤其是在为 AD 患者开具杜比单抗处方时。相反,本研究的结果有助于减轻不合并 AD 的 SA 患者对眼部 AEs 的潜在担忧。此外,眼科治疗能有效控制大多数眼部 AEs,这表明杜比单抗在日常治疗中具有良好的耐受性,多学科合作对于在停用杜比单抗前积极控制眼部 AEs 至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Higher prevalence of dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events in atopic dermatitis compared to asthma: A daily practice analysis

Higher prevalence of dupilumab-induced ocular adverse events in atopic dermatitis compared to asthma: A daily practice analysis

Background

Dupilumab has been shown to be an effective treatment in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and severe asthma (SA). However, comparative real-world analyses of adverse events (AE), particularly dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD), are lacking.

Objective

This is the first real-world study to provide insight into the prevalence of AEs associated with dupilumab in AD compared with SA. Secondary objectives were to assess the prevalence, onset and therapeutic strategies of DAOSD and evaluate dupilumab discontinuation rates.

Methods

Data from two daily practice registries including AD and SA patients receiving dupilumab treatment were analyzed. Adverse events, including DAOSD, were evaluated.

Results

In total, 322 AD and 148 SA patients were included. Headaches (23.6%), injection site reactions (10.1%), and influenza-like symptoms (13.5%) were more prevalent in SA patients. Interestingly, ocular AEs were significantly more prevalent in AD patients (62.1%, p < 0.001), including conjunctivitis (17.1%, p = 0.004). 88% AD and 47% SA patients with ocular AEs received one or more ophthalmic treatment(s). Additionally, 20% of AD and 17.6% of SA patients discontinued dupilumab treatment due to ocular AEs, while only 65% of these AD and none of these SA patients were referred to an ophthalmologist.

Conclusion

The higher incidence of DAOSD in AD patients compared with SA patients in this real-world study highlights the importance of physician awareness, especially when prescribing dupilumab to AD patients. Conversely, the findings of this study help alleviate potential concerns about ocular AEs in patients with SA who do not have comorbid AD. Furthermore, the effective management of most ocular AEs with ophthalmic treatments suggests favorable tolerability of dupilumab in daily practice, and multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to proactively manage ocular AEs before discontinuing dupilumab.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信