近似复制保罗、李和阿什顿（2022 年）的研究成果：谁会说亲社会谎言？

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104525

Nina Reinhardt, Magdalena Mikesch, Lennart Hoppe, Marc-André Reinhard

{"title":"近似复制保罗、李和阿什顿（2022 年）的研究成果：谁会说亲社会谎言？","authors":"Nina Reinhardt, Magdalena Mikesch, Lennart Hoppe, Marc-André Reinhard","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Within the present research, we conducted a close replication of <span><span>Paul et al. (2022)</span></span>, who reported the HEXACO Honesty-Humility trait to be positively correlated with prosocial lies by applying a procedure in which participants should rate a poorly written essay. Consistent with the original study, participants (<em>N</em> = 324) higher in Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness showed more prosocial lying. Because the associations disappeared within a shared regression model, we assume the correlation between Honesty-Humility and prosocial lies to be weaker than postulated within the original study and to be at least as equivalently strong as the association between Agreeableness and prosocial lies. The validity and generalizability of the findings and the limitations of the original and the replication study are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 104525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000734/pdfft?md5=56f437d2edfe8409b32826625331cb2c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000734-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Close replication of Paul, Lee, and Ashton (2022): Who tells prosocial lies?\",\"authors\":\"Nina Reinhardt, Magdalena Mikesch, Lennart Hoppe, Marc-André Reinhard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Within the present research, we conducted a close replication of <span><span>Paul et al. (2022)</span></span>, who reported the HEXACO Honesty-Humility trait to be positively correlated with prosocial lies by applying a procedure in which participants should rate a poorly written essay. Consistent with the original study, participants (<em>N</em> = 324) higher in Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness showed more prosocial lying. Because the associations disappeared within a shared regression model, we assume the correlation between Honesty-Humility and prosocial lies to be weaker than postulated within the original study and to be at least as equivalently strong as the association between Agreeableness and prosocial lies. The validity and generalizability of the findings and the limitations of the original and the replication study are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000734/pdfft?md5=56f437d2edfe8409b32826625331cb2c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000734-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000734\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中，我们对保罗等人（Paul et al., 2022）的研究进行了近似的复制。保罗等人报告说，HEXACO诚实-谦逊特质与亲社会谎言呈正相关，他们采用了一个程序，让参与者对一篇写得不好的文章进行评分。与最初的研究结果一致，诚实-谦逊性和宜人性较高的参与者（N = 324）表现出更多的亲社会谎言。由于这些关联在一个共同的回归模型中消失了，因此我们假定诚实-谦逊与亲社会谎言之间的相关性比原研究中假定的要弱，并且至少与 "同意度 "与亲社会谎言之间的相关性一样强。本文讨论了研究结果的有效性和可推广性，以及原始研究和复制研究的局限性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Close replication of Paul, Lee, and Ashton (2022): Who tells prosocial lies?

Within the present research, we conducted a close replication of Paul et al. (2022), who reported the HEXACO Honesty-Humility trait to be positively correlated with prosocial lies by applying a procedure in which participants should rate a poorly written essay. Consistent with the original study, participants (N = 324) higher in Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness showed more prosocial lying. Because the associations disappeared within a shared regression model, we assume the correlation between Honesty-Humility and prosocial lies to be weaker than postulated within the original study and to be at least as equivalently strong as the association between Agreeableness and prosocial lies. The validity and generalizability of the findings and the limitations of the original and the replication study are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Research in Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

6.10%

发文量

102

审稿时长

67 days

期刊介绍： Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.