国际贸易背景下的碳生产力分解

IF 6.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECOLOGY
{"title":"国际贸易背景下的碳生产力分解","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Noting the rising importance of international trade in global warming, this study proposes a new decomposition of carbon productivity by dividing it into the part of true carbon productivity (consumption-based labor productivity and population-sustaining power of CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) and the part with zero-sum nature (labor exploitation, carbon emission exploitation and trade surplus). By analyzing 66 countries/regions and the rest of the world in 2018, we find that by excluding the exploitation part, the differences in carbon productivity among countries – particularly between developed and developing countries – narrow. Analysis for selected economies (EU15, EU13, the United States, Japan, China and India) from 1995 to 2018 reveals that international exploitation of labor and carbon emissions has deepened from 1995 to 2006, and weakened from 2006 to 2018, but the structure of exploitation has been maintained through the entire period; the consumption-based labor productivity and population-sustaining power of CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> effects are the principal driving factors of change in carbon productivity. The growth in true carbon productivity increased in the last half of the period, but the improvement is still quite modest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002349/pdfft?md5=636aa792cb99f2d75d2a486483d356c4&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924002349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The decomposition of carbon productivity under the context of international trade\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Noting the rising importance of international trade in global warming, this study proposes a new decomposition of carbon productivity by dividing it into the part of true carbon productivity (consumption-based labor productivity and population-sustaining power of CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) and the part with zero-sum nature (labor exploitation, carbon emission exploitation and trade surplus). By analyzing 66 countries/regions and the rest of the world in 2018, we find that by excluding the exploitation part, the differences in carbon productivity among countries – particularly between developed and developing countries – narrow. Analysis for selected economies (EU15, EU13, the United States, Japan, China and India) from 1995 to 2018 reveals that international exploitation of labor and carbon emissions has deepened from 1995 to 2006, and weakened from 2006 to 2018, but the structure of exploitation has been maintained through the entire period; the consumption-based labor productivity and population-sustaining power of CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> effects are the principal driving factors of change in carbon productivity. The growth in true carbon productivity increased in the last half of the period, but the improvement is still quite modest.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002349/pdfft?md5=636aa792cb99f2d75d2a486483d356c4&pid=1-s2.0-S0921800924002349-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002349\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800924002349","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注意到国际贸易在全球变暖中的重要性不断上升,本研究提出了一种新的碳生产率分解方法,将其分为真正的碳生产率部分(基于消费的劳动生产率和二氧化碳的人口维持力)和零和性质的部分(劳动剥削、碳排放剥削和贸易顺差)。通过对 2018 年 66 个国家/地区和世界其他地区的分析,我们发现,剔除剥削部分后,各国(尤其是发达国家和发展中国家)之间的碳生产率差异缩小了。对部分经济体(欧盟15国、欧盟13国、美国、日本、中国和印度)1995年至2018年的分析显示,1995年至2006年,国际间对劳动力和碳排放的剥削有所加深,2006年至2018年有所减弱,但整个时期的剥削结构保持不变;基于消费的劳动生产率和二氧化碳效应的人口维持力是碳生产率变化的主要驱动因素。真实碳生产率的增长在后半期有所提高,但提高幅度仍然不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The decomposition of carbon productivity under the context of international trade

Noting the rising importance of international trade in global warming, this study proposes a new decomposition of carbon productivity by dividing it into the part of true carbon productivity (consumption-based labor productivity and population-sustaining power of CO2) and the part with zero-sum nature (labor exploitation, carbon emission exploitation and trade surplus). By analyzing 66 countries/regions and the rest of the world in 2018, we find that by excluding the exploitation part, the differences in carbon productivity among countries – particularly between developed and developing countries – narrow. Analysis for selected economies (EU15, EU13, the United States, Japan, China and India) from 1995 to 2018 reveals that international exploitation of labor and carbon emissions has deepened from 1995 to 2006, and weakened from 2006 to 2018, but the structure of exploitation has been maintained through the entire period; the consumption-based labor productivity and population-sustaining power of CO2 effects are the principal driving factors of change in carbon productivity. The growth in true carbon productivity increased in the last half of the period, but the improvement is still quite modest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Economics
Ecological Economics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
313
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership. Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信