针对失语症的多任务评估:目录排序任务。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jacqueline Hinckley, Janet Patterson, Stephanie Karidas
{"title":"针对失语症的多任务评估:目录排序任务。","authors":"Jacqueline Hinckley, Janet Patterson, Stephanie Karidas","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2390971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multitasking assessments based on everyday scenarios are useful assessment tools that can reveal the consequences of language and cognitive impairments on functioning. Unfortunately, many existing multitasking assessments require a high degree of linguistic processing that may preclude their use with adults with aphasia. The purposes of this paper are to (1) describe the development of a multitasking assessment relevant to everyday activities, the Catalog Ordering Task (COT), specifically designed for aphasia, (2) investigate differences between the performances of adults without aphasia and adults with aphasia on the COT, and (3) explore the relationships between language and cognitive performances and the COT to facilitate clinical utility. Seventy-four participants, 40 adults with aphasia and 34 people without aphasia, completed the multitasking assessment in single and dual task conditions. The secondary task in the dual task condition was a tone detection task requiring a foot-pedal press. Participants with aphasia also completed additional language and cognitive assessments. We systematically developed the Catalog Ordering Test (COT) with considerations for semantics, syntax, and ecological validity. Criterion validity with acceptable levels of inter-rater and test-retest reliability were observed. Adults with aphasia performed with about half the accuracy and twice as slowly as people without aphasia. Adults with all severity levels of aphasia were able to complete the COT. Multitasking performance on the COT was related to impairment-level measures of language and cognition. The COT is a potentially clinically useful assessment of multitasking, specially designed for aphasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multitasking assessment for aphasia: The Catalog Ordering Task.\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Hinckley, Janet Patterson, Stephanie Karidas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2024.2390971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Multitasking assessments based on everyday scenarios are useful assessment tools that can reveal the consequences of language and cognitive impairments on functioning. Unfortunately, many existing multitasking assessments require a high degree of linguistic processing that may preclude their use with adults with aphasia. The purposes of this paper are to (1) describe the development of a multitasking assessment relevant to everyday activities, the Catalog Ordering Task (COT), specifically designed for aphasia, (2) investigate differences between the performances of adults without aphasia and adults with aphasia on the COT, and (3) explore the relationships between language and cognitive performances and the COT to facilitate clinical utility. Seventy-four participants, 40 adults with aphasia and 34 people without aphasia, completed the multitasking assessment in single and dual task conditions. The secondary task in the dual task condition was a tone detection task requiring a foot-pedal press. Participants with aphasia also completed additional language and cognitive assessments. We systematically developed the Catalog Ordering Test (COT) with considerations for semantics, syntax, and ecological validity. Criterion validity with acceptable levels of inter-rater and test-retest reliability were observed. Adults with aphasia performed with about half the accuracy and twice as slowly as people without aphasia. Adults with all severity levels of aphasia were able to complete the COT. Multitasking performance on the COT was related to impairment-level measures of language and cognition. The COT is a potentially clinically useful assessment of multitasking, specially designed for aphasia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2390971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2390971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于日常场景的多任务评估是一种有用的评估工具,可以揭示语言和认知障碍对功能的影响。遗憾的是,许多现有的多任务评估都需要高度的语言处理能力,这可能会使其无法用于成年失语症患者。本文旨在:(1)介绍一种与日常活动相关的多任务评估方法--目录排序任务(COT)--的开发过程,该方法是专门为失语症患者设计的;(2)研究无失语症成人与失语症成人在目录排序任务上的表现差异;(3)探讨语言和认知表现与目录排序任务之间的关系,以促进临床应用。74名参与者(40名成人失语症患者和34名非失语症患者)在单任务和双任务条件下完成了多任务评估。双重任务条件下的次要任务是需要按下脚踏板的音调检测任务。有失语症的参与者还完成了额外的语言和认知评估。我们系统地开发了目录排序测验(COT),并考虑了语义、语法和生态学的有效性。我们观察到了标准效度以及评分者之间和测试-再测可靠性的可接受水平。有失语症的成人的准确率约为无失语症成人的一半,速度是后者的两倍。所有严重程度的失语症成人都能完成 COT。在 COT 中的多任务处理表现与语言和认知障碍水平的测量结果有关。COT是一种专门针对失语症设计的、对临床有用的多任务评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multitasking assessment for aphasia: The Catalog Ordering Task.

Multitasking assessments based on everyday scenarios are useful assessment tools that can reveal the consequences of language and cognitive impairments on functioning. Unfortunately, many existing multitasking assessments require a high degree of linguistic processing that may preclude their use with adults with aphasia. The purposes of this paper are to (1) describe the development of a multitasking assessment relevant to everyday activities, the Catalog Ordering Task (COT), specifically designed for aphasia, (2) investigate differences between the performances of adults without aphasia and adults with aphasia on the COT, and (3) explore the relationships between language and cognitive performances and the COT to facilitate clinical utility. Seventy-four participants, 40 adults with aphasia and 34 people without aphasia, completed the multitasking assessment in single and dual task conditions. The secondary task in the dual task condition was a tone detection task requiring a foot-pedal press. Participants with aphasia also completed additional language and cognitive assessments. We systematically developed the Catalog Ordering Test (COT) with considerations for semantics, syntax, and ecological validity. Criterion validity with acceptable levels of inter-rater and test-retest reliability were observed. Adults with aphasia performed with about half the accuracy and twice as slowly as people without aphasia. Adults with all severity levels of aphasia were able to complete the COT. Multitasking performance on the COT was related to impairment-level measures of language and cognition. The COT is a potentially clinically useful assessment of multitasking, specially designed for aphasia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信