新型儿科机械循环支持风险分层工具的开发与验证:高级心脏治疗改善结果网络(ACTION)心室辅助装置评分。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002297
Carlos Bonilla-Ramirez, Angela Lorts, Joseph A Spinner, Lydia Wright, Robert A Niebler, David M Peng, Ryan R Davies, David N Rosenthal, Matthew J O'Connor
{"title":"新型儿科机械循环支持风险分层工具的开发与验证:高级心脏治疗改善结果网络(ACTION)心室辅助装置评分。","authors":"Carlos Bonilla-Ramirez, Angela Lorts, Joseph A Spinner, Lydia Wright, Robert A Niebler, David M Peng, Ryan R Davies, David N Rosenthal, Matthew J O'Connor","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We sought to develop and validate a new risk stratification score for mortality for children supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD). This retrospective, multicenter study used data from patients undergoing VAD implantation between April 2018 and February 2023 at 44 participating institutions in the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes (ACTION) network. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards modeled mortality after VAD implantation. A total of 1,022 patients were enrolled. The 1 year mortality was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-23). The multivariable model was used to build the ACTION VADs risk stratification score with four components: ventilation, advanced organ support (dialysis or ECMO), diagnosis, and size (weight ≤5 kg). One point is added for each risk factor. Based on the sum of the risk factors, patients were classified into four classes: class 0-green (4% mortality at 1 year), class 1-yellow (16% mortality at 1 year), class 2-orange (21% mortality at 1 year), and class 3 or higher-red (42% mortality at 1 year). The score performed well, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and excellent calibration. The ACTION VADs score for mortality can be calculated easily and offers risk stratification and prognostic information for pediatric VAD candidates. This is the first validated risk assessment tool for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"270-275"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Risk Stratification Tool: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) Ventricular Assist Device Score.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Bonilla-Ramirez, Angela Lorts, Joseph A Spinner, Lydia Wright, Robert A Niebler, David M Peng, Ryan R Davies, David N Rosenthal, Matthew J O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We sought to develop and validate a new risk stratification score for mortality for children supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD). This retrospective, multicenter study used data from patients undergoing VAD implantation between April 2018 and February 2023 at 44 participating institutions in the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes (ACTION) network. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards modeled mortality after VAD implantation. A total of 1,022 patients were enrolled. The 1 year mortality was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-23). The multivariable model was used to build the ACTION VADs risk stratification score with four components: ventilation, advanced organ support (dialysis or ECMO), diagnosis, and size (weight ≤5 kg). One point is added for each risk factor. Based on the sum of the risk factors, patients were classified into four classes: class 0-green (4% mortality at 1 year), class 1-yellow (16% mortality at 1 year), class 2-orange (21% mortality at 1 year), and class 3 or higher-red (42% mortality at 1 year). The score performed well, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and excellent calibration. The ACTION VADs score for mortality can be calculated easily and offers risk stratification and prognostic information for pediatric VAD candidates. This is the first validated risk assessment tool for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"270-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002297\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002297","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们试图为使用心室辅助装置(VAD)的儿童开发并验证一种新的死亡率风险分层评分。这项回顾性多中心研究使用了2018年4月至2023年2月期间在高级心脏治疗改善结果(ACTION)网络的44家参与机构接受VAD植入术的患者数据。多变量 Cox 比例危害对 VAD 植入后的死亡率进行了建模。共有1,022名患者入选。一年的死亡率为 19%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:16-23)。多变量模型用于建立 ACTION VADs 风险分层评分,其中包括四个组成部分:通气、高级器官支持(透析或 ECMO)、诊断和体型(体重≤5 千克)。每个风险因素加一分。根据风险因素的总和,患者被分为四个等级:0 级-绿色(1 年内死亡率为 4%)、1 级-黄色(1 年内死亡率为 16%)、2 级-橙色(1 年内死亡率为 21%)、3 级或更高-红色(1 年内死亡率为 42%)。该评分表现良好,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.72,校准效果极佳。ACTION VADs死亡率评分计算简便,可为儿科VAD候选者提供风险分层和预后信息。这是首个经过验证的儿科机械循环支持风险评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of a Novel Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support Risk Stratification Tool: The Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network (ACTION) Ventricular Assist Device Score.

We sought to develop and validate a new risk stratification score for mortality for children supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD). This retrospective, multicenter study used data from patients undergoing VAD implantation between April 2018 and February 2023 at 44 participating institutions in the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes (ACTION) network. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards modeled mortality after VAD implantation. A total of 1,022 patients were enrolled. The 1 year mortality was 19% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-23). The multivariable model was used to build the ACTION VADs risk stratification score with four components: ventilation, advanced organ support (dialysis or ECMO), diagnosis, and size (weight ≤5 kg). One point is added for each risk factor. Based on the sum of the risk factors, patients were classified into four classes: class 0-green (4% mortality at 1 year), class 1-yellow (16% mortality at 1 year), class 2-orange (21% mortality at 1 year), and class 3 or higher-red (42% mortality at 1 year). The score performed well, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 and excellent calibration. The ACTION VADs score for mortality can be calculated easily and offers risk stratification and prognostic information for pediatric VAD candidates. This is the first validated risk assessment tool for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信