利用监督机器学习模型挖掘 CT 扫描图像,诊断中耳后天性胆脂瘤

IF 2.5 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Naouar Ouattassi, Mustapha Maaroufi, Hajar Slaoui, Taha Benateya Andaloussi, Arsalane Zarghili, Mohamed Nouredine El Amine El Alami
{"title":"利用监督机器学习模型挖掘 CT 扫描图像,诊断中耳后天性胆脂瘤","authors":"Naouar Ouattassi,&nbsp;Mustapha Maaroufi,&nbsp;Hajar Slaoui,&nbsp;Taha Benateya Andaloussi,&nbsp;Arsalane Zarghili,&nbsp;Mohamed Nouredine El Amine El Alami","doi":"10.1186/s43088-024-00534-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Distinguishing between middle ear cholesteatoma and chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is an ongoing challenge. While temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scan is highly accurate for diagnosing middle ear conditions, its specificity in discerning between cholesteatoma and CSOM is only moderate. To address this issue, we utilized trained machine learning models to enhance the specificity of temporal bone CT scan in diagnosing middle ear cholesteatoma. Our database consisted of temporal bone CT scan native images from 122 patients diagnosed with middle ear cholesteatoma and a control group of 115 patients diagnosed with CSOM, with both groups labeled based on surgical findings. We preprocessed the native images to isolate the region of interest and then utilized the Inception V3 convolutional neural network for image embedding into data vectors. Classification was performed using machine learning models including support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), random forest, and neural network. Statistical metrics employed to interpret the results included classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, confusion matrix, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and FreeViz diagram.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our training dataset comprised 5390 images, and the testing dataset included 125 different images. The neural network, k-NN, and SVM models demonstrated significantly higher relevance in terms of classification accuracy, precision, and recall compared to the random forest model. For instance, the F1 scores were 0.974, 0.987, and 0.897, respectively, for the former three models, in contrast to 0.661 for the random forest model.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The performance metrics of the presented trained machine learning models hold promising prospects as potentially clinically useful aids.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":481,"journal":{"name":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-024-00534-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle ear-acquired cholesteatoma diagnosis based on CT scan image mining using supervised machine learning models\",\"authors\":\"Naouar Ouattassi,&nbsp;Mustapha Maaroufi,&nbsp;Hajar Slaoui,&nbsp;Taha Benateya Andaloussi,&nbsp;Arsalane Zarghili,&nbsp;Mohamed Nouredine El Amine El Alami\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43088-024-00534-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Distinguishing between middle ear cholesteatoma and chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is an ongoing challenge. While temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scan is highly accurate for diagnosing middle ear conditions, its specificity in discerning between cholesteatoma and CSOM is only moderate. To address this issue, we utilized trained machine learning models to enhance the specificity of temporal bone CT scan in diagnosing middle ear cholesteatoma. Our database consisted of temporal bone CT scan native images from 122 patients diagnosed with middle ear cholesteatoma and a control group of 115 patients diagnosed with CSOM, with both groups labeled based on surgical findings. We preprocessed the native images to isolate the region of interest and then utilized the Inception V3 convolutional neural network for image embedding into data vectors. Classification was performed using machine learning models including support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), random forest, and neural network. Statistical metrics employed to interpret the results included classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, confusion matrix, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and FreeViz diagram.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Our training dataset comprised 5390 images, and the testing dataset included 125 different images. The neural network, k-NN, and SVM models demonstrated significantly higher relevance in terms of classification accuracy, precision, and recall compared to the random forest model. For instance, the F1 scores were 0.974, 0.987, and 0.897, respectively, for the former three models, in contrast to 0.661 for the random forest model.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The performance metrics of the presented trained machine learning models hold promising prospects as potentially clinically useful aids.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://bjbas.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43088-024-00534-5\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-024-00534-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43088-024-00534-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景区分中耳胆脂瘤和慢性化脓性中耳炎(CSOM)是一项持续的挑战。虽然颞骨计算机断层扫描(CT)诊断中耳疾病的准确性很高,但其鉴别胆脂瘤和慢性化脓性中耳炎的特异性却不高。为了解决这个问题,我们利用训练有素的机器学习模型来提高颞骨 CT 扫描诊断中耳胆脂瘤的特异性。我们的数据库由 122 名确诊为中耳胆脂瘤的患者和 115 名确诊为 CSOM 的对照组患者的颞骨 CT 扫描原始图像组成,两组患者均根据手术结果进行标记。我们对原始图像进行预处理,分离出感兴趣的区域,然后利用 Inception V3 卷积神经网络将图像嵌入数据向量。我们使用机器学习模型进行分类,包括支持向量机(SVM)、k-近邻(k-NN)、随机森林和神经网络。用于解释结果的统计指标包括分类准确率、精确度、召回率、F1 分数、混淆矩阵、接收者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和 FreeViz 图表。与随机森林模型相比,神经网络、k-NN 和 SVM 模型在分类准确度、精确度和召回率方面都表现出明显更高的相关性。例如,前三种模型的 F1 分数分别为 0.974、0.987 和 0.897,而随机森林模型的 F1 分数为 0.661。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Middle ear-acquired cholesteatoma diagnosis based on CT scan image mining using supervised machine learning models

Background

Distinguishing between middle ear cholesteatoma and chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) is an ongoing challenge. While temporal bone computed tomography (CT) scan is highly accurate for diagnosing middle ear conditions, its specificity in discerning between cholesteatoma and CSOM is only moderate. To address this issue, we utilized trained machine learning models to enhance the specificity of temporal bone CT scan in diagnosing middle ear cholesteatoma. Our database consisted of temporal bone CT scan native images from 122 patients diagnosed with middle ear cholesteatoma and a control group of 115 patients diagnosed with CSOM, with both groups labeled based on surgical findings. We preprocessed the native images to isolate the region of interest and then utilized the Inception V3 convolutional neural network for image embedding into data vectors. Classification was performed using machine learning models including support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), random forest, and neural network. Statistical metrics employed to interpret the results included classification accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, confusion matrix, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and FreeViz diagram.

Results

Our training dataset comprised 5390 images, and the testing dataset included 125 different images. The neural network, k-NN, and SVM models demonstrated significantly higher relevance in terms of classification accuracy, precision, and recall compared to the random forest model. For instance, the F1 scores were 0.974, 0.987, and 0.897, respectively, for the former three models, in contrast to 0.661 for the random forest model.

Conclusion

The performance metrics of the presented trained machine learning models hold promising prospects as potentially clinically useful aids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (BJBAS) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal. This journal welcomes submissions of original research, literature reviews, and editorials in its respected fields of fundamental science, applied science (with a particular focus on the fields of applied nanotechnology and biotechnology), medical sciences, pharmaceutical sciences, and engineering. The multidisciplinary aspects of the journal encourage global collaboration between researchers in multiple fields and provide cross-disciplinary dissemination of findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信